Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Jersey is dual licensed CDDL and a transitive dependency from (at least) Hadoop and Spark. > On Jul 27, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Kam Kasravi wrote: > > Hi Justin > > These were tagged as GPL > > > I'll determine their dependencies linkage - we have no references to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi Justin These were tagged as GPL I'll determine their dependencies linkage - we have no references to com.sun.jersey within our codebase but it looks to be dual licensed? ThanksKam On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 6:28 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, > [Kam] This

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi, > [Kam] This analyzes jars required to build the binary artifacts - so my > assumption is that it is not relevant to release just the source? Apache project cannot have GPL dependancies [1][5][6] (there are however a few exceptions for optional parts[2] and some build tools [3]). I’d first

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi Justin Again - thanks for your vigilance and time to review RC4. >All like like there may be license dependancy issues, but I’m not familiar >enough with sbt and the project to comment. This "sbt dependencyLicenseInfo | >grep GNU” shows several GPL dependancies (may be duplicated?). It may be

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi John Thanks for the review.  >- I ran license dump on the release.  Checked the output from >output/target/license-reports and it reported several GPL dependencies. >Can you take a look and perhaps put in overrides for the correct licenses? For this report it is examining artifacts required to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi, Looks much better than the last release candidate, however still +0 (binding) due to LICENSE issues, the items brought up for the last RC have not been addressed and possible GPL dependancies. All like like there may be license dependancy issues, but I’m not familiar enough with sbt and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Kam, Apologies for the delay. A couple of questions about the release. - I ran license dump on the release. Checked the output from output/target/license-reports and it reported several GPL dependencies. Can you take a look and perhaps put in overrides for the correct licenses? - In addition,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi IPMC Community We have not receive enough votes in the voting period to allow us to release Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1 and therefore will extend the vote for most of this week - given this is a popular time for vacations, etc. If you have the time please evaluate 0.8.1-RC4 candidate. The

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

I am out until the first week of August. Could one of the Gearpump mentors also on the IPMC have a look? > On Jul 25, 2016, at 1:14 AM, Manu Zhang wrote: > > Could any PMC members please take a look at this release candidate ? > We have already passed the vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi Manu, As far as I can tell, you can extend a running vote for any period beyond the minimum. Please take into consideration that people can be very busy with $jobs, or - given this time of the year (the vacation period etc.)- with other aspects regarding life. That being said, If you - after

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Could any PMC members please take a look at this release candidate ? We have already passed the vote deadline but not got a vote yet. BTW, can we extend the vote because of the weekends ? Thanks, Manu Zhang On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM Kam Kasravi wrote: > Hi IPMC