Re: [VOTE] Ratis-thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

2018-11-09 Thread Jitendra Pandey
+1 (binding) verified signatures LICENSE and NOTICE look good ASF headers good Builds from the source. On 11/9/18, 11:42 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: Thanks, Justin. Will take an action-item for the file extensions. On 11/8/18 11:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [VOTE] Ratis-thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

2018-11-09 Thread Josh Elser
Thanks, Justin. Will take an action-item for the file extensions. On 11/8/18 11:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes fine, but you may want to check the file extensions as policy changed a little while back to what was allowed -

Re: [VOTE] Ratis-thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

2018-11-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes fine, but you may want to check the file extensions as policy changed a little while back to what was allowed - LICENSE and NOTICE good - no binary files - no source files, but poms have ASF headers - can compile from

Re: [VOTE] Ratis-thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

2018-11-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > And on that note: those 72hours elapses today. Any IPMC votes would be > greatly appreciated! Your mentors are IPMC member and can vote on this release, given it basically contains nothing I’m not sure why they haven’t. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Ratis-thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

2018-11-08 Thread Josh Elser
Looks like I forgot to include duration in my initial message. Of course, this will run for at least the customary 72hours. And on that note: those 72hours elapses today. Any IPMC votes would be greatly appreciated! - Josh On 11/5/18 2:09 PM, Josh Elser wrote: IPMC, Please vote on the