The vote has finished, I will send another email for the vote result.
Thank you.
--
Liang Zhang (John)
Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo
Juan Pan 于2020年1月8日周三 下午12:00写道:
> Get your point as well, thanks, Justin. :-)
>
>
> Juan Pan (Trista)
>
> Senior DBA & PPMC of Apache
Get your point as well, thanks, Justin. :-)
Juan Pan (Trista)
Senior DBA & PPMC of Apache ShardingSphere(Incubating)
E-mail: panj...@apache.org
On 01/8/2020 11:34,Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
I noticed this too in my dev vote check too. I want to ask, considering
Got it. Thanks for the explanation. :)
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
Justin Mclean 于2020年1月8日周三 上午11:35写道:
> Hi,
>
> > I noticed this too in my dev vote check too. I want to ask, considering
> the
> > source codes were tagged in 12/30/2019, the NOTICE should be right to
> keep
> > in 2019
Hi,
> I noticed this too in my dev vote check too. I want to ask, considering the
> source codes were tagged in 12/30/2019, the NOTICE should be right to keep
> in 2019 for this release.
The year should be the year of publication, but it doesn’t really matter, and
if it did it would be when we
Hi Justin
I noticed this too in my dev vote check too. I want to ask, considering the
source codes were tagged in 12/30/2019, the NOTICE should be right to keep
in 2019 for this release.
Am I right?
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
zhangli...@apache.org 于2020年1月8日周三 上午11:21写道:
> > - NOTICE
> - NOTICE has wrong year
Thank you your remind. I will fix it on dev branch soon and ensure it
correct by next release.
--
Liang Zhang (John)
Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo
Justin Mclean 于2020年1月8日周三 上午9:09写道:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> -
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hash good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is OK
- NOTICE has wrong year
- No unexpended binary files
- all source file have ASF headers
- can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
Yep, i missed it, thanks.
Juan Pan
panj...@apache.org
Juan Pan(Trista), Apache ShardingSphere
On 11/21/2019 20:12,Ming Wen wrote:
A link of the ASF code of conduct has been added to our code of conduct
page [2]. However, i also want to plead you to confirm whether this link[3]
is what you
> A link of the ASF code of conduct has been added to our code of conduct
page [2]. However, i also want to plead you to confirm whether this link[3]
is what you mentioned.
I think you'd better also add the link of ASF code of conduct in Github:
Hi Justin,
Very appreciated your detailed checking.
An issue[1] based on your suggestions was created and would be done before next
release.
> You might want to add a link the ASF code of conduct in your code of conduct.
A link of the ASF code of conduct has been added to our code of
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 18/11/2019 10:40, Juan Pan wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ShardingSphere (Incubating) version
> 4.0.0-RC3.
>
> The Apache ShardingSphere community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release
> Apache ShardingSphere
Hi
> Could you explain to me how the connivance binaries relate to the source
code? There a JDBC, a proxy and a UI binary but only one source release are
those three binaries built form the source in the source release?
All source codes of 3 binary releases are included in source release.
The
Hi,
+1 (binding)
In the source release I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE fine
- all files have ASF headers
- no unexpected binary files
- can compile from source
A couple of suggestions:
- You might want to add a link the ASF
Hi,
Could you explain to me how the connivance binaries relate to the source code?
There a JDBC, a proxy and a UI binary but only one source release are those
three binaries built form the source in the source release?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
+1, binding
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Checked PGP signatures and checksums
- All files have license headers if necessary.
Best Regards,
Von Gosling
> On Nov 18, 2019, at 5:40 PM, Juan Pan wrote:
>
>
Carry my +1 binding from dev ml
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
Juan Pan 于2019年11月18日周一 下午5:40写道:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ShardingSphere (Incubating)
> version 4.0.0-RC3.
>
> The Apache ShardingSphere community has voted on and approved a proposal
> to
We’ve received 4 +1 binding votes and 1 +1 non-binding vote:
+1 binding, Justin Mclean
+1 binding, Willen Jiang
+1 binding, Furkan KAMACI
+1 binding, Gosling Von
+1 non-binding, William Guo
Thank you everyone for taking the time to review the release and help us.
I will process to publish the
+1 (binding), forward my vote from PPMC.
Best Regards,
Von Gosling
> On Aug 20, 2019, at 6:16 PM, Zhang Yonglun wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ShardingSphere (Incubating)
> version 4.0.0-RC2.
>
> The Apache ShardingSphere community has voted on and
+1
I checked:
- Can compile from source
- DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE exists
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- ASF headers fine
Thanks,
William
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:49 PM Willem Jiang wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
>
> The artifacts has incubating in the
Hi,
+1 from me.
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Signatures are OK
- Code compiles
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:49 AM Willem Jiang
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
>
> The
+1 (binding)
I checked:
The artifacts has incubating in the name.
There is no binary in the release kit.
signature and hash is OK
DISCLAIMER file exists
LICENSE and NOTICE looks good to me.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:15 PM Zhang Yonglun
I have put the wrong link of Maven 2 staging repository, now it's updated
to:
Maven 2 staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheshardingsphere-1022/org/apache/shardingsphere/
Zhang Yonglun 于2019年8月20日周二 下午6:16写道:
> Hello all,
>
> This is a call for vote
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE file (no 3rd party software included)
- No binary files
- All source files have ASF headers
- Can compile from source
This is as about as simple as it get to review :-)
Thank for your remind, I will remind mentor to make vote clear next time.
--
Liang Zhang (John)
Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo
Justin Mclean 于2019年4月21日周日 下午5:50写道:
> Hi,
>
> > I saw the following mail from Willem, but this mail goes to dev@. My
> mail
> > achieved them in the
Hi,
> I saw the following mail from Willem, but this mail goes to dev@. My mail
> achieved them in the same thread(maybe because of the title).
No issue he vote is still binding and you have the 3 +1 votes, it just good to
clear :-)
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Justin
Yes. You are right. Sorry, my misread.
I saw the following mail from Willem, but this mail goes to dev@. My mail
achieved them in the same thread(maybe because of the title).
```
+1 (binding)
Forward my VOTE from dev@ list
```
Hi Liang Zhang
Please notice this, if face this again,
Hi,
> I saw three +1 votes, including two mentors, Willem and Gosling, and I
> gave +1 too.
AFACS Willem's vote didn’t end up in this thread [1] but ended up on your dev
list [2]. I think this confusion happed as you sent the initial vote email to
both lists.
Thanks,
Justin
1.
Hi Justin
I saw three +1 votes, including two mentors, Willem and Gosling, and I
gave +1 too.
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin
Twitter, wusheng1108
Justin Mclean 于2019年4月21日周日 下午4:54写道:
> Hi,
>
> > The vote has already opened for at least 72 hours and necessary number
Hi,
> The vote has already opened for at least 72 hours and necessary number of
> votes are reached.
There’s only 2 +1 votes I count here and you need 3 for a vote to pass. Did you
have the rIPMC member vote on your dev list?
Thanks,
Justin
We’ve received 3 +1 binding votes and 0 +1 non-binding vote:
+1 binding, Willen Jiang
+1 binding, Sheng Wu
+1 binding, Gosling Von
Thank you everyone for taking the time to review the release and help us.
I will process to publish the release and send ANNOUNCE.
--
Liang Zhang
Sorry, Let me correct. I will statistics vote result here, not for new
thread.
--
Liang Zhang (John)
Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo
zhangli...@apache.org 于2019年4月21日周日 下午4:46写道:
> Thank you every one.
> The vote has already opened for at least 72 hours and necessary number of
Thank you every one.
The vote has already opened for at least 72 hours and necessary number of
votes are reached.
Release vote is passed, I will sent a new thread to statistics all
participant mentors and paste thread link here.
--
Liang Zhang (John)
Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo
Hi,
+1(binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashed format(SHA512) fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers
- can compile from source
Best Regards,
Von Gosling
> On Apr 16, 2019, at 4:32 PM,
+1 binding
checked
1. acs exist and checked
2. LICENSE and NOTICE exist in the source tar
3. DISCLAIMER exists
4. sha512 exist
5. source compile passed.
6. rat exclusions look right, no special. Rat passed.
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin
Twitter, wusheng1108
Willem
I am sorry to make a bit confusing, dev list just for cc, we have already
finished ShardingSphere' s community internal vote.
This thread is for IPMC vote only.
--
Liang Zhang (John)
Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo
于2019年4月16日周二 下午4:57写道:
> Hi,
>
> > Have a vote on the dev list
Hi,
> Have a vote on the dev list finished or are you just telling teh IPMC that
> you are voting on the dev list? If it the later then there is no need to do
> although I guess sit may possibly manage to get a few more IPMC votes.
> However sending the vote to two lists at once could also be
Hi,
Have a vote on the dev list finished or are you just telling teh IPMC that you
are voting on the dev list? If it the later then there is no need to do
although I guess sit may possibly manage to get a few more IPMC votes. However
sending the vote to two lists at once could also be a bit
37 matches
Mail list logo