I still don't see how that gets around the perception, and the
reality, that development is being done outside the list.
So I don't see that proposal as helping out at all...
On Sep 16, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
I understand the concern raised by the use of real-time communication
Hi
To cut a long story short: ALOIS is _not_ about a chat channel, it's a
tool for security incident and event management. Since the chat channell
in the required resources list was only a wish, I gladly dropped it off
the proposal.
Best
Urs
Am Freitag, den 17.09.2010, 07:32 -0400 schrieb Jim
On 9/17/2010 9:41 AM, Urs Lerch wrote:
To cut a long story short: ALOIS is _not_ about a chat channel, it's a
tool for security incident and event management. Since the chat channell
in the required resources list was only a wish, I gladly dropped it off
the proposal.
Hi Urs,
While I
+1. It's hypocrisy to tell podlings that chat is entirely intolerable
when plenty of running projects have them.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Glen Daniels g...@thoughtcraft.com wrote:
On 9/17/2010 9:41 AM, Urs Lerch wrote:
To cut a long story short: ALOIS is _not_ about a chat channel, it's
Hi Glen
Thanks for your input and a different view. I took the chat channell off
the proposal, because I don't want that the project to be assessed on
this single point. If a chat is useful for the followers, why not, as
long as it is transparent and decisions are not made that way.
Best
Urs
On 09/17/2010 08:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
+1. It's hypocrisy to tell podlings that chat is entirely intolerable
when plenty of running projects have them.
+1 indeed. If not, ATS is in big trouble :). We have a very active
community in the IRC room, where we brainstorm and help each
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote:
On 09/17/2010 08:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
+1. It's hypocrisy to tell podlings that chat is entirely intolerable
when plenty of running projects have them.
+1 indeed. If not, ATS is in big trouble :). We have a very
On 9/17/2010 11:27 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote:
+1 indeed. If not, ATS is in big trouble :). We have a very active community
in the IRC room, where we brainstorm and help each other out all the time
I don't think
I understand the concern raised by the use of real-time communication for
Apache projects - that decisions may be made off-list, and that folks who
aren't a party to the real-time communication do not have the opportunity to
benefit from or impact the decisions that result from the real-time
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com wrote:
...I'm interested in what others think of their proposal for supporting
real-time communication, and curious what others are doing, if anything, to
support the growing interest in real-time communication between project
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 21:32 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com wrote:
...I'm interested in what others think of their proposal for supporting
real-time communication, and curious what others are doing, if anything, to
11 matches
Mail list logo
