On Dec 5, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I am only comfortable allowing singular IPMC votes from members of the ASF.
I think the IPMC owes this much to the other members of the Foundation.
I've now
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I am only comfortable allowing singular IPMC votes from members of the ASF.
I think the IPMC owes this much to the other members of the Foundation.
I've now contemplated this condition for a few days and while I'm
On Nov 27, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I am not sure that this is a step in the correct direction.
Dave, I'm sure you
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I am not sure that this is a step in the correct direction.
Dave, I'm sure you realize that your opposition is deeply disapointing to a
+1 from my experience in the other side of the business
the first release is the actual challenge for a podling
all your learned there will be applied in new releases
On 26/11/13 00:29, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
...Ant, you proposed a minimum of one IPMC vote for each release:
...
How about simply changing the rules for Incubator releases so that they
don't require at least three binding votes, but instead make it at
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
This would provide good oversight, while helping educate the PPMC
members and keep a good record of the release requirements that other
podlings can use as examples. And make sure people's +1s are based on
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
There are legal reasons for requiring three binding votes. Any change
to this would need to fully understand those reasons
We're in the clear. See this message from Roy:
http://s.apache.org/yPX
I believe that
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:30 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Do these sort of experiments really need consensus?
Ultimately, no.
Roy's message at http://s.apache.org/yPX indicates that the IPMC can set
policy as to how releases are approved. We would do so by modifying this
section
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release vote thresholds
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I am not sure that this is a step in the correct direction.
Dave, I'm sure you realize that your opposition is deeply disapointing to a
number of us, when we seem so close
Do these sort of experiments really need consensus? The Incubator PMC
is so big and diverse now it makes getting consensus on some things
all most impossible, after the change a little while back we don't
even need consensus for voting in new Incubator PMC members now.
...ant
On Sat, Nov 23,
On 23/11/13 09:30, ant elder wrote:
(...) The Incubator PMC is so big and diverse now (...)
Sorry, off-topic, but interesting for me to get a better understanding
of the conflict is being discussing: how bit is the Incubator PMC right now?
Because I only see a group of about 20-30 people
Currently listed at 180+.
Upayavira
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
On 23/11/13 09:30, ant elder wrote:
(...) The Incubator PMC is so big and diverse now (...)
Sorry, off-topic, but interesting for me to get a better understanding
of the conflict is being
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:33 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
I think this is getting too hung up on vetting releases is the be
On Nov 22, 2013, at 1:09 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:33 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
I think this
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I am not sure that this is a step in the correct direction.
Dave, I'm sure you realize that your opposition is deeply disapointing to a
number of us, when we seem so close.
I will work with you to see if we can build
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:33 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
I think this is getting too hung up on vetting releases is the be all and
end all of PMC membership when really there are other just as if not
17 matches
Mail list logo
