FYI :-)
@Ivan: we should add gene...@logging.apache.org to our default
recipients... the others may want to know about our little milestones
without subscribing to log4php-dev
Cheers!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ivan Habunek
Date: Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:01 PM
Subject
Dear all,
I am pleased to announce that the vote to release Apache log4php 2.1.0
has passed.
The following people voted:
* Christian Grobmeier +1
* Vladimir Gorej +1
* Ivan Habunek +1
* Scott Deboy +1 (non binding)
Thanks to everyone who participated. I will be publishing the release
in the
se Apache log4php 2.1.0
> has passed.
>
> The following people voted:
> * Christian Grobmeier +1
> * Vladimir Gorej +1
> * Ivan Habunek +1
> * Scott Deboy +1 (non binding)
>
> Thanks to everyone who participated. I will be publishing the release
> in th
up.
>
> Best regards,
> Ivan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12 July 2011 11:17, Ivan Habunek wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am pleased to announce that the vote to release Apache log4php 2.1.0
>> has passed.
>>
>> The following people
gt; It is my pleasure to announce the second release candidate for Apache
>> log4php 2.1.0.
>>
>> Since we are short of PMC members at the log4php project, I would
>> appreciate if other PMCs would join in so that we may pass this vote.
>>
>> Fixes compared to RC1:
candidate for Apache
> log4php 2.1.0.
>
> Since we are short of PMC members at the log4php project, I would
> appreciate if other PMCs would join in so that we may pass this vote.
>
> Fixes compared to RC1:
> * included build.xml in source packages
> * fixed ve
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Ivan Habunek wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It is my pleasure to announce the second release candidate for Apache
> log4php 2.1.0.
>
> Since we are short of PMC members at the log4php project, I would
> appreciate if other PMCs would join in so that
Dear all,
It is my pleasure to announce the second release candidate for Apache
log4php 2.1.0.
Since we are short of PMC members at the log4php project, I would
appreciate if other PMCs would join in so that we may pass this vote.
Fixes compared to RC1:
* included build.xml in source packages
PMCs -
we are currently voting on the next log4php release (see below).
Please take yourself a few minutes and participate in the vote.
I am - unfortunately - the only PMC involved in log4php, so we need your voices
Cheers
Christian
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ivan Habunek
Log4PHP
graduates as a sub-project of Logging.
Thanks everyone for the nice voter turnout.
I believe the next step here is for the IPMC Chair to do a handover to the
Logging PMC Chair, after which resources can start to be moved over - thanks
Noel in advance :)
Gav...
> -Origi
+1
--kevan
On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Gav... wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as
> follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
>
> * Gavin McDonald
> * Christian Hammers
> * Jim Jagie
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Gav... wrote:
> The Log4PHP community feels it has fulfilled all graduation requirements to
> become a sub-project.
>
> This vote is to ask that the IPMC approve the graduation of Log4PHP as a
> sub-project of Apache Logging.
>
> The vote st
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Gav... wrote:
> [X] - +1 - Graduate Log4PHP as a sub-project of Apache Logging.
> [ ] - +/-0 - Don't care, whatever the majority decides.
> [ ] - -1 - Strongly object to this graduation (because ...
kudos to everyone who helped get this back on t
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Gav... wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as
> follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
>
> * Gavin McDonald
> * Christian Hammers
> * Jim Jagielski
+1
Ralph
On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Gav... wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as
> follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
>
> * Gavin McDonald
> * Christian Hammers
> * Jim Jagie
+1
...ant
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Gav... wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as
> follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
>
> * Gavin McDonald
> * Christian Hammers
> *
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Gav... wrote:
Hi All,
The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other
votes as
follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
* Gavin McDonald
* Christian Hammers
* Jim Jagielski
* Jesus Christian (non
+1
On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Gav... wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as
> follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
>
> * Gavin McDonald
> * Christian Hammers
> * Jim Jagielski
+1, Graduate Log4PHP as a sub-project of Apache Logging.
Congrats!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 2010-03-04, Gav... wrote:
> This vote is to ask that the IPMC approve the graduation of Log4PHP as a
> sub-project of Apache Logging.
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.o
+1
- Original Message
> From: Brett Porter
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 5:23:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Graduate Log4PHP as a subproject of Logging project
>
> +1
>
> On 04/03/2010, at 8:18 PM, Gav... wrote:
>
>
+1
On 04/03/2010, at 8:18 PM, Gav... wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as
> follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
>
> * Gavin McDonald
> * Christian Hammers
> * Jim Jagielski
+1 Congrats!
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi All,
The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as
follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
* Gavin McDonald
* Christian Hammers
* Jim Jagielski
* Jesus Christian (non binding)
* Christian Grobmeier
The Logging PMC has voted [2] with 7
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 03:51:48PM +0100, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Marvin - was this by accident, by tool or was this message intendent
> without body?
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Marvin wrote:
> >
I didn't send that message, and I have no connection to the project. I wish
you a
After 4 years in Incubation, this is great news indeed, and after a couple
of restarts along the way, it makes this release even more sweet.
Congratulations to the Log4PHP team.
Gav...
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com]
> Sent: M
Dear all,
the Log4PHP community is pleased to introduce the Apache Log4PHP 2.0.0
(Incubating) release [1]. It's the first Log4PHP release since 2004
and tons of changes have been done. Finally Log4PHP has become a well
tested framework made for PHP 5.
Many thanks to all the contributors who
PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release RC3 as Log4PHP 2.0.0
To: general@incubator.apache.org
The log4php PPMC vote was opened on log4php-dev at Nov 27, 2009 and
closed at Dec 4, 2009. Binding +1 votes were received from Christian
Grobmeier, Christian Hammers and Curt Arnold. No other votes were
received
On Dec 10, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Thanks Gavin :-)
> I addressed all your points in LOG4PHP-90 for a later discussion.
> Just one +1 necessary - please, if somebody has some time.
>
I'll ditto my +1 from log4php-dev.
By my count, that is 3 +1
Thanks Gavin :-)
I addressed all your points in LOG4PHP-90 for a later discussion.
Just one +1 necessary - please, if somebody has some time.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Gavin wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 December 2009 9:26 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release RC3 as Log4PHP 2.0.0
>
> > +1
>
> Thanks - anybody
d a task for the next release in jira
> Also there's a bunch of html files in docs\log4php that don't have an
> Apache License header, it wasn't obvious if they are generated or not
> but it could be worth seeing if the header can be added to them.
They are all generated. I w
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
> The log4php PPMC vote was opened on log4php-dev at Nov 27, 2009 and closed at
> Dec 4, 2009. Binding +1 votes were received from Christian Grobmeier,
> Christian Hammers and Curt Arnold. No other votes were received.
>
>
The log4php PPMC vote was opened on log4php-dev at Nov 27, 2009 and closed at
Dec 4, 2009. Binding +1 votes were received from Christian Grobmeier,
Christian Hammers and Curt Arnold. No other votes were received.
The link in the original thread ends at the end of November. The PPMC release
Dear Incubator PMC,
the Log4PHP has voted with 3x +1 for releasing RC3 as Log4PHP 2.0.0
(please see below).
The original vote message can be found:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-log4php-dev/200911.mbox/%3cded132f10911262256j12c0cfej21e7e5dbdcf18...@mail.gmail.com%3e
Message
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Gavin wrote:
> If your still willing, can I add you in as a Mentor ?
Yes, on the basis that I mentioned; A non-technical Mentor, as I have
zero or less PHP experience and don't intend to get any...
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.o
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin [mailto:ga...@16degrees.com.au]
> Sent: Monday, 27 April 2009 2:46 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Getting Log4PHP going again.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: hedh...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: hedh...@gmail.com [mailto:hedh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Niclas
> Hedhman
> Sent: Sunday, 22 March 2009 2:38 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting Log4PHP going again.
>
>
> I am not a PHP guy at all
> -Original Message-
> From: Upayavira [mailto:u...@odoko.co.uk]
> Sent: Saturday, 25 April 2009 3:07 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Getting Log4PHP going again.
>
> On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:25 +1000, Gavin wrote:
> >
> > > -
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:25 +1000, Gavin wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, 25 April 2009 12:54 AM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Getting Log4PHP going again.
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 25 April 2009 12:54 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting Log4PHP going again.
>
> If we already have your iCLA, I will add you post-haste!
>
> I *wi
If we already have your iCLA, I will add you post-haste!
I *wish* some threads were dying down :)
On Apr 23, 2009, at 5:42 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Just want to confirm my interest in response.
My apache id is "grobmeier" - feel free to add me to the log4php
project :
Just want to confirm my interest in response.
My apache id is "grobmeier" - feel free to add me to the log4php project :-)
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Gavin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Well things seem to be dying down here, ApacheCon well and truly over, boar
Hi All,
Well things seem to be dying down here, ApacheCon well and truly over, board
meeting is done and this thread celebrates 1 month today :)
So, just checking in, can we do something about this Log4PHP revival ?
Thanks
Gav...
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin [mai
Just barely getting my head back above water after aceu09 but
Yes, I'd like this to happen. Cycles free up later this week
when I return from San Mateo.
On Mar 21, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Gavin wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to know what is best to do to get Log4PHP going again.
Basically, I&
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, 30 March 2009 3:29 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting Log4PHP going again.
>
> Hi folks,
>
> any news on the log4php "issue"?
I
Hi folks,
any news on the log4php "issue"?
I have now been elected by Apache Commons as a Comitter and can help
more easy now. Is it possible to volunteer for comit access and help
log4php directly?
Best,
Christian
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Sat,
>> We should concentrate in PHP5 and for this we need helping hands and a bit
>> time.
>
> I am not a PHP guy at all, but AFAIUI (only from the package
> resolution issues in Debian) the PHP4 and PHP5 is incompatible and
> that a port require substantial work.
Incompatibility is true when running
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> The log4php code is quite stable, but since the last big changes some
> time has gone. PHP4, in which the code has been written, has reached
> the end of its life in august 2008. No development will be done here.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Luciano Resende [mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 22 March 2009 4:15 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting Log4PHP going again.
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> I also asked on the log4php list if there are interested people for
> the GSoC. If it is possible for an incubation project to participate,
> maybe somebody can help me to get this introduced in the apache way.
>
Ye
Hi again,
> The log4php code is quite stable, but since the last big changes some
> time has gone. PHP4, in which the code has been written, has reached
> the end of its life in august 2008. No development will be done here.
>
> I really think that we should finish the developm
to jump in as committer and do the stuff of applying
> patches, updating the website, the status page, getting the ball rolling on
> looking forwards to an initial incubator release.
>
> Advice welcome, can we do something about this soon?
The log4php code is quite stable, but since the last
Hi All,
I'd like to know what is best to do to get Log4PHP going again.
Basically, I'm offering to step in and do the admin/patch-work that needs to
happen to keep it ticking along etc. We have Christian Grobmeier waiting in
the wings providing patches etc, using the mailing lists
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Santiago Gala wrote:
> El lun, 16-03-2009 a las 12:58 -0400, Noel J. Bergman escribió:
> > Stonehenge and Kato reported, but the others are all absent.
> > Cassandra, I note, discussed the need for a report, but failed to
> > provide one.
> >
>
> shindig discusse
I am away on vacation and not really well connected. Could someone
else write add/complete my lines to the incubator report? Brian? Ian?
But to sum it up: Cassandra had a very(!) slow start. First code just
got in a couple of days ago. Hardly any traffic on the lists yet. (a
little concerne
El lun, 16-03-2009 a las 12:58 -0400, Noel J. Bergman escribió:
> Stonehenge and Kato reported, but the others are all absent.
> Cassandra, I note, discussed the need for a report, but failed to
> provide one.
>
shindig discussed it too, and failed to report too
> Mentors should please review
Stonehenge and Kato reported, but the others are all absent. Cassandra, I
note, discussed the need for a report, but failed to provide one.
Mentors should please review these projects, and comment on what actions they
feel are appropriate.
--- Noel
--
Hi,
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2009, those board
reports are missing - I assume adding them Real Soon Now is still
possible.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Fo
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Well, one sure way is to a formal release and get more
> people to look at it.
log4php would surely benefit of that. I watched this list for a while
now, and it looks like less activity. Somebody here told me that there
is no activity
Well, one sure way is to a formal release and get more
people to look at it.
On Jan 30, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Danny Angus wrote:
We've been using log4php during development work, taking the next step
on the road to production obviously depends upon the stability and
future of the project
We've been using log4php during development work, taking the next step
on the road to production obviously depends upon the stability and
future of the project.
I'm reasonably comfortable with the way things work @apache, my
question is really whether any of you think its more likely to
Noel,
I had forgotten to submit anything... basically, time got away
from me.
log4php is slow... very slow. It is being used, but only occasionally
do we get bug reports, which are handled pretty quickly however.
On Dec 15, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
What is the status? See
What is the status? See the Board report for what I culled from the mailing
list and SVN, but we've not received a report from the project.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Fo
On Friday 02 November 2007 23:26, Gerald Pierce wrote:
> Yes I am testing what I have found at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/log4php/trunk
>
> If this is the wrong place to get the code please let me know where I can
> find the most current version.
Yes, tha
Yes I am testing what I have found at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/log4php/trunk
If this is the wrong place to get the code please let me know where I can find
the most current version.
I will let you know what I find out
Jerry
>>> Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Jerry,
We recently "rebooted" Log4PHP, to help drive continued,
healthy development. And usage :)
Are you able to try what we have already available? Your
feedback would be very valuable.
On Nov 1, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Gerald Pierce wrote:
When is log4PHP scheduled to come out of
When is log4PHP scheduled to come out of incubation.
We need to use a logger and We would like to use lpg4PHP if it is anything like
log4J
Jerry Pierce
Web Administrator
Colorado Department of corrections
-
To unsubscribe
On Jul 29, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 7/27/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Retrying with a hopefully catchier subject line.
i've checked out the website into a log4php directory. please try
updating.
the permissions are the same as the othe
On 7/27/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Retrying with a hopefully catchier subject line.
>
>
> On Jul 23, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
>
> > I've staged the content for the log4php website at http://
> > svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator
Retrying with a hopefully catchier subject line.
On Jul 23, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
I've staged the content for the log4php website at http://
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/log4php/site/. But I do not
have permission to create /www/incubator.apache.org/log4p
I've staged the content for the log4php website at http://
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/log4php/site/. But I do not have
permission to create /www/incubator.apache.org/log4php on
people.apache.org. Could someone with the appropriate privileges set
up that directory appropriate
Best of luck. Nice to see a project restart, and I hope that this time it
makes it all the way through. :-)
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 July 2007 6:46 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [RESULT][PROPOSAL] Log4PHP restart proposal
>
>
> On Jun 29, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
>
>
On Jun 29, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
= Abstract =
Revival of the terminated log4php incubation with a new development
community and a goal to migrate log4php to PHP 5.
Voting has now been open for over 5 days with 3 +1's from Curt
Arnold, Jim Jagielski and Ber
On 6/29/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Revival of the terminated log4php incubation with a new development
community and a goal to migrate log4php to PHP 5
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
The Log4PHP restart proposal vote (http://thread.gmane.org/
gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/15122) has been open for 72 hours
at this time and there have been +1 votes from Curt Arnold and Jim
Jagielski, both IPMC members. Additional votes or comments from
other IPMC members are
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
= Abstract =
Revival of the terminated log4php incubation with a new development
community and a goal to migrate log4php to PHP 5.
= Proposal =
Restart the terminated log4php incubation, open the log4php SVN
module to modifications and
I missed an email where Scott Deboy (sdeboy) offered to act as a
mentor, consider the proposal amended to add him as a designated mentor.
There is a Logging Services PMC vote in progress (http://mail-
archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-general/200706.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) to indicate
= Abstract =
Revival of the terminated log4php incubation with a new development
community and a goal to migrate log4php to PHP 5.
= Proposal =
Restart the terminated log4php incubation, open the log4php SVN
module to modifications and grant commit rights to the initial
committers
The log4php incubation was terminated back in February and no one
took any action to close it out. I just copied log4php from the
logging tree to the incubator tree (surprised I had enough karma). I
didn't see any obvious home for dormant code and several retired
projects were
On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
Acting only as mentor and Incubator PMC member and not on behalf of
the Logging Services PMC, I request that the Incubator PMC
terminate the log4php incubation. The source code should continue
to be available from the Subversion, though
+1 to put it into a dormant status.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 14, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
criteria. log4php has had no code modification in over a year and
minimal activity on the log4php-dev and log4php-user mailing
lists. Repeated attempts have been made to
+1
On 2/15/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 14, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
> There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
> criteria.
> Here is my +1
+1.
Thanks Curt! Sorting this out is neve
On Feb 14, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
criteria.
Here is my +1
+1.
Thanks Curt! Sorting this out is never fun...
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
On Thursday 15 February 2007 00:42, Curt Arnold wrote:
+1
Cheers
Niclas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/14/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
criteria. log4php has had no code modification in over a year and
minimal activity on the log4php-dev and log4php-user mailing lists.
Repeated attempts have been m
Curt Arnold wrote:
>
> Acting only as mentor and Incubator PMC member and not on behalf of the
> Logging Services PMC, I request that the Incubator PMC terminate the
> log4php incubation. The source code should continue to be available
> from the Subversion, though possibly
Curt Arnold wrote:
>
> Acting only as mentor and Incubator PMC member and not on behalf of the
> Logging Services PMC, I request that the Incubator PMC terminate the
> log4php incubation. The source code should continue to be available
> from the Subversion, though possibly
Hi,
On 2/14/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Acting only as mentor and Incubator PMC member and not on behalf of
the Logging Services PMC, I request that the Incubator PMC terminate
the log4php incubation.
+1.
how to revive the project if circumstances change. The Incubat
There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
criteria. log4php has had no code modification in over a year and
minimal activity on the log4php-dev and log4php-user mailing lists.
Repeated attempts have been made to communicate with the sole
committer without success
og4net developers should start up a vote saying
they're ready for graduation, and the Logging Services PMC should have
one to essentially confirm what you're saying above: that the LS PMC
is ready, willing, and able to accept log4net as a subproject.
Will move on that.
log4php appea
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 2/8/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've already started a thread on eliminating or simplifying the
Logging Services bylaws (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-
logging-general&m=117095930231054&w=2). I thought I saw an thread
here that suggested tha
27;re ready for graduation, and the Logging Services PMC should have
one to essentially confirm what you're saying above: that the LS PMC
is ready, willing, and able to accept log4net as a subproject.
log4php appears to be dormant (I've pinged the original
author and am waiting for a sta
es will be on general@logging.apache.org, but wanted to solicit
advice and participation.
log4net appears to be healthy and ready to join Logging Services as a
subproject. log4php appears to be dormant (I've pinged the original
author and am waiting for a status update) and would be nice
Hola,
On 12/22/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the peculiar nature of log4php, I think there's a rather odd
notion available of considering it to retire from incubation into the
logging project as a retired subproject. Close down the lists, and
keep the svn
On 12/22/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 12/22/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There wasn't a report from log4php in this month's Incubator report,
> and looking at the history things have been pretty quiet in its
> reports for a
Hi,
On 12/22/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There wasn't a report from log4php in this month's Incubator report,
and looking at the history things have been pretty quiet in its
reports for a long time (also, no svn commit or dev email for 10
months).
Anyone know w
There wasn't a report from log4php in this month's Incubator report,
and looking at the history things have been pretty quiet in its
reports for a long time (also, no svn commit or dev email for 10
months).
Anyone know what's up with it?
Quite likely no one does - in which ca
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
