Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Last comment from me for today: Thanks very much for continuing to exercise discipline in rate-limiting your communiques, Benson. I dread the prospect of returning to the overheating, rapid-fire IPMC of a few years ago. > to me, PMC mem

Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Benson Margulies
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2015, at 7:04 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Benson Margulies >>> wrote: ...This scheme locates that responsibilit

Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Jan 5, 2015, at 7:04 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Benson Margulies >> wrote: >>> ...This scheme locates >>> that responsibility in the renamed committee, which serves the board >>> by supervisi

Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Jan 5, 2015, at 6:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: >> >> >> On Jan 5, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> wrote: >> > On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies > wrote: > > For your reading and wrangling plea

Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Benson Margulies
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> ...This scheme locates >> that responsibility in the renamed committee, which serves the board >> by supervising the pTLPs. They aren't mentors, they are PMC members... > > O

Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > ...This scheme locates > that responsibility in the renamed committee, which serves the board > by supervising the pTLPs. They aren't mentors, they are PMC members... Ok, but the board needs to accept those folks, and the incoming pTLP nee

Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Benson Margulies
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > > On Jan 5, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2. ... >> >>

Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Jan 5, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: >>> >>> For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer: >>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2. ... > > IIUC the main difference (besides subtle naming changes) is that

Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer: >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2. ... IIUC the main difference (besides subtle naming changes) is that pTLPs vote on their own releases, based on pTLP PMC members who hav

Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread jan i
On 5 January 2015 at 14:16, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > > On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies > wrote: > > > > For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2. > > > > The goal of this exercise is to turn the idea of the pTLP into a > >

Re: pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
> On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2. > > The goal of this exercise is to turn the idea of the pTLP into a > practical alternative. By 'practical', I mean: 'based on the > cons

pTLP, concretely

2015-01-05 Thread Benson Margulies
For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2. The goal of this exercise is to turn the idea of the pTLP into a practical alternative. By 'practical', I mean: 'based on the constraints as I see them'; the board and comdev are not going to find a li