Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread Ted Leung
+1 On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal which

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread Erik Hatcher
+1 On Feb 9, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread Santiago Gala
+1 El sáb, 09-02-2008 a las 11:09 -0500, Sam Ruby escribió: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread Martijn Dashorst
+1 On 2/9/08, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread Paul Fremantle
+1 Paul On Feb 10, 2008 11:58 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On 2/9/08, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread Daniel S. Haischt
+1 (non-binding) Cheers Daniel S. Haischt Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
...Now it is time to vote... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread Leo Simons
On Feb 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: I would like to proudly start this off with my +1. +1! Project Name: CouchDB - == Proposal == The goal is to create either an Apache top level project around the existing CouchDB open source project. Key Features: * a

Re: [VOTE] Accept PDFBox for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Friday 01 February 2008 22:18, Jukka Zitting wrote: Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. [x] +1 Accept PDFBox as a new podling Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here;

Re: [VOTE] as to Thrift Proposal

2008-02-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
+1 Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread Brian McCallister
+1 On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to

Re: [DISCUSS] Re-election of podling committers before graduation

2008-02-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 04 February 2008 04:11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: STM that something along these lines would be a more lightweight but equally effective process. we could ask the PPMC if it's pruned inactive committers from the graudation list. Personally, I don't see a difference between

Re: [DISCUSS] More systematic disclosure of company affiliations

2008-02-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Sunday 03 February 2008 00:39, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Following up on the community diversity discussions of last December [1], I propose disclosing the company affiliations of podling committers and mentors more systematically, at the start and end of the incubation process. Sounds

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-10 Thread J Aaron Farr
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal which can be

Re: [VOTE] as to Thrift Proposal

2008-02-10 Thread J Aaron Farr
On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Mark Slee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the Wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal +1 -- J Aaron Farr jadetower.com[US] +1 724-964-4515 馮傑仁 cubiclemuses.com