in my ex-company we used two different approaches, we were using mercurial
but the same concepts apply here
1- use one repo and have branches for each component in which u make
changes and then we merge that back into the main/default branch from which
we make releases
2- have different repo for
Hi Eric!
I tend to think that 'Less is more', that 'git is now a defacto
standard', and that releasing all Mayhem components at the same time,
with the same version number (even if there is no change for some of
them) is easier for the user.
it would be nice if they'd share a common core
Hi Mohammad!
1- use one repo and have branches for each component in which u make
changes and then we merge that back into the main/default branch from which
we make releases
2- have different repo for each component which is easier but includes
maintaining more reps
well in either case
Different topic: Is there a potential naming/trademark
issue related to a pre-existing project?
http://www.outercurve.org/Galleries/InnovatorsGallery/Mayhem
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi again Mohammad,
I was just having a conversation with Benson and started putting down
the list of initial components
mayhem-parent
mayhem-site
mayhem-guava (formerly G-Guava)
mayhem-scheduler (formerly Guartz)
mayhem-spi (formerly GSPI)
mayhem-test (formerly JUnice)
mayhem-lifecycle (formerly
Good morning President :)
Gianugo pointed me to the homepage of Make Mayem[1] and I found a
trademarked software[2] which is called Mayhem as well.
Trademarkia shows that more than 10 pages of results of products are
registered with the name Mayhem, which I suspect is a daily used
word in English
Putting trademarks into the loop.
Trademark people, any comments to Simones mail? I am not sure if a
commonly used word like Mayhem can be a matter of an trademark
Thanks in advance,
Christian
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Good morning President
Hello,
This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now submitting
for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
Cheers,
Adam Berry
= HDT (Hadoop Development Tools) =
== Abstract ==
Tools to support developing applications that use Apache Hadoop from
I would like to propose a new Activity Streams server project to the
Incubator. The proposal is on the wiki at the following location:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal
Streams is a collaborative effort from multiple organizations and
individuals working with and around the
+1 binding.
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 7, 2012, at 4:57 AM, Adam Berry wrote:
Hello,
This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
Cheers,
Adam Berry
= HDT (Hadoop Development Tools) =
==
+1 (binding)
On 11/6/12 10:57 AM, Adam Berry ambe...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hello,
This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
Cheers,
Adam Berry
= HDT (Hadoop Development Tools) =
== Abstract
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 11/6/12 10:57 AM, Adam Berry ambe...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hello,
This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
submitting for a vote for this project to be
Hi there,
I'm working to something[1] (not yet fully open source released) which
could somehow overlap with Streams.
I'm also one of the authors of the Activity Streams Ontology[2] which
is the rdf-ish version of activitystrea.ms.
I'll be really happy to contribute on Streams.
cheers,
[1]
+1, binding
On 6 November 2012 16:57, Adam Berry ambe...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hello,
This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
Cheers,
Adam Berry
Hi Christian...
Isn't that a step that should be done before graduation, in other words
this should not stop going with the Incubator acceptance [VOTE] ?
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
Putting trademarks into the loop.
Trademark people, any
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't that a step that should be done before graduation, in other words
this should not stop going with the Incubator acceptance [VOTE] ?
I agree, no need to block the acceptance vote. But a thing we
Renaming later (a) creates work for infra, (b) forces the community to
expend effort communicating the rename to the world. So id'd be better
to settle the name sooner rather than later.
Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 20:57:26 +0100:
Hi Christian...
Isn't that a step
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Adam Berry ambe...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hello,
This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
Cheers,
Adam Berry
= HDT (Hadoop Development
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Adam Berry ambe...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hello,
This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
Cheers,
Adam Berry
= HDT (Hadoop Development Tools)
+ 1 (binding)
Suresh
On Nov 6, 2012, at 10:57 AM, Adam Berry ambe...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hello,
This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
Cheers,
Adam Berry
= HDT (Hadoop
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...
1. A number of people think that all mentors should have been signing all
reports all along, so that changing the template as part of clarifying this
is not a big deal.
Sure. The mentors should be part of the
21 matches
Mail list logo
