Perhaps this can be a good addition to wimsy
OpenSource Project Name Checker: https://github.com/LogIN-/ospnc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45241.html I would like to call a Vote for accepting Taverna as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TavernaProposal Vote is open until at least Sunday, 19th October 2014, 23:59:00 UTC [ ] +1 accept Lens in the Incubator [ ] ±0 [ ] -1 because... +1 (binding) Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
This vote thread looks like a hanging chad. The current vote count is: +1 Ted +1 Lars +1 Justin +1 or -1: Grant -0 Jan I would love to have a clarification vote from Grant. I read his concern and the subsequent messages to mean +1 but I'm a bit biased as I'd like to see this release go out. Whatever the case, I suggest we give 24 hours for additional feedback and then finish the vote. If Grant does not clarify his stance, I propose that we ignore his ambiguous vote. Steven, how does that sound? thanks, Jacques On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: If it contains sources, it's not a binary release. Not strictly true. Binary artifacts often contain source code examples. Also, for Drill specifically, the code generation strategy that Drill uses requires that snippets of source for different operators and system packaged UDF's will be in the binary release. The user has no clue about this source, much of which is machine generated from templates. From the user's point of view, however, it is a binary distro because they can download it and run Drill with no further build steps.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
This sounds good to me. On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: This vote thread looks like a hanging chad. The current vote count is: +1 Ted +1 Lars +1 Justin +1 or -1: Grant -0 Jan I would love to have a clarification vote from Grant. I read his concern and the subsequent messages to mean +1 but I'm a bit biased as I'd like to see this release go out. Whatever the case, I suggest we give 24 hours for additional feedback and then finish the vote. If Grant does not clarify his stance, I propose that we ignore his ambiguous vote. Steven, how does that sound? thanks, Jacques On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: If it contains sources, it's not a binary release. Not strictly true. Binary artifacts often contain source code examples. Also, for Drill specifically, the code generation strategy that Drill uses requires that snippets of source for different operators and system packaged UDF's will be in the binary release. The user has no clue about this source, much of which is machine generated from templates. From the user's point of view, however, it is a binary distro because they can download it and run Drill with no further build steps. -- Steven Phillips Software Engineer mapr.com
