Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:55 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be > expected prior to importing into an ASF repo. That's the usual protocol. Thanks, Roman.

Re: Request for Incubator Wiki Access

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Christopher wrote: Can I get edit access to the Wiki? Username: ChristopherTubbs Karma granted, enjoy editing! Nick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: Request for Incubator Wiki Access

Thanks! On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:15 PM Nick Burch wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Christopher wrote: > > Can I get edit access to the Wiki? > > > > Username: ChristopherTubbs > > Karma granted, enjoy editing! > > Nick > >

[PROPOSAL] Fluo

For the incubator consideration, the Fluo developers submit the following proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FluoProposal = Fluo Proposal = == Abstract == Fluo is a distributed system for incrementally processing large data sets stored in Accumulo. == Proposal == Fluo is a

Request for Incubator Wiki Access

Can I get edit access to the Wiki? Username: ChristopherTubbs

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Core Release 3.2.1-incubating (RC1)

Hi IPMC members, With 2 +1 binding votes from Justin and Alan, we need one more vote to proceed with the release. May I ask for one more check and vote on the RC1. Staging directory: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/apex/v3.2.1-incubating-RC1 Source zip:

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-0.3.0 (RC3)

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - name contains incubating - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good. - All Apache licenses source files have headers - No binary files in the source release Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Retire Concerted

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 4/19/16, 4:32 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: >Following a discussion[1], the Concerted community has voted to retire >the project from incubation[2]. Per the retirement guide[3], the next >step is an IPMC vote for retirement. > >This is a vote of

Re: [VOTE] Retire Concerted

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 04/20/2016 01:32 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: Following a discussion[1], the Concerted community has voted to retire the project from incubation[2]. Per the retirement guide[3], the next step is an IPMC vote for retirement. This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the

RE: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-0.3.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon -Original Message- From: Anh Dinh [mailto:dinh...@comp.nus.edu.sg] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 12:55 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-0.3.0 (RC3) Hi all, The SINGA community has voted on

Re: [VOTE] Retire Concerted

+1 Retire Concerted On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:32 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > Following a discussion[1], the Concerted community has voted to retire the > project from incubation[2]. Per the retirement guide[3], the next step is > an IPMC vote for retirement. > > This is a vote of

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

The vote is now closed. The vote passes with 24 +1 votes and no 0 or -1s. The breakdown is 14 binding and 10 non-binding. Thank you everyone for taking the time to review and cast your vote. We will submit the resolution to the next Board meeting. The votes cast in the order received are as

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-0.3.0 (RC3)

Dear all, Thanks everyone for their votes and comments. I'm pleased to announce that this vote has passed with the following results: 4 binding +1: Edward J. Yoon Justin Mclean Thejas Nair Alan Gates No 0s or -1 We'll now roll this release out to the mirrors. Many thanks, Anh.

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-0.3.0 (RC3)

+1 http://compliance.rocks/result.html?1e40bc34 Looks like there are a few files missing license headers. Please update them before next release. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > +1. LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER and rat check look good. The signatures

Re: [VOTE] Retire Concerted

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Following a discussion[1], the Concerted community has voted to retire the > project from incubation[2]. Per the retirement guide[3], the next step is an > IPMC vote for retirement. > > This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm

Re: [VOTE] Retire Concerted

+1 -Jake On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Following a discussion[1], the Concerted community has voted to retire the > project from incubation[2]. Per the retirement guide[3], the next step is > an IPMC vote for retirement. > > This is a vote of the IPMC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M2

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in name - signatures correct - DISCLAIMER exits - source LICENSE has some minor issues (see below) - source NOICE is good - several JS files are missing Apache headers - no unexpected binary files in source release - can compile from source Source license

[VOTE] Retire Concerted

Following a discussion[1], the Concerted community has voted to retire the project from incubation[2]. Per the retirement guide[3], the next step is an IPMC vote for retirement. This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling. [ ] +1 to retire Concerted from the

Re: [VOTE] Retire Concerted

I don't like seeing podlings not make it. But in this case it seems like it's the right thing to do. +1 (binding) -Taylor > On Apr 19, 2016, at 7:32 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Following a discussion[1], the Concerted community has voted to retire the > project from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M2

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incubating.M2. > > This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.M2.RC2, has successfully passed a > vote for a release >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

"One question I have, just because the googlecode shutdown is pretty confusing. Was this development originally from this group (e.g. was it originally Edward Capriolo?) or was it someone else that may need to pursue a SGA from?" Good question. The development was not originally from this group.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be expected prior to importing into an ASF repo. John On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:28 AM Edward Capriolo wrote: > "One question I have, just because the googlecode shutdown is pretty > confusing. Was this