Re: [VOTE] HTrace 4.2-incubating release

[Mike Drob]

Justin,

Yes, the compilation issue is MSHADE-148, also captured in HTRACE-236. [1]

Although MSHADE-148 is resolved, you can see discussion towards the end of the 
JIRA that identifies it as still a problem for HTrace and others. For now, the 
workaround is to either build with Maven 3.0.4, which I will agree is 
inconvenient and needs to be better documented.

I will file JIRA issues for your other suggestions shortly.

Mike

[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTRACE-236 

On 2016-09-30 21:40 (-0500), Justin Mclean  wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> +0 binding as I had issues compiling (see below). Happy to change to +1 if I 
> can compile everything else is good.
> 
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signature and hashes good
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE is missing MIT licensed normalise.css bundled in several bootstrap 
> files. e.g. [2]. Please fix for net release.
> - NOTICE good
> - All Apache files have ASF header
> - No unexpended binary files
> - Can’t compile
> 
> You may want to remove the copyright line from this ASF header [1]
> 
> The compile seem to get stuck in an infinite loop at this point:
> [INFO] Replacing original artifact with shaded artifact.
> [INFO] Replacing 
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheHtrace/htrace-4.2.0-incubating/htrace-hbase/target/htrace-hbase-4.2.0-incubating.jar
>  with 
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheHtrace/htrace-4.2.0-incubating/htrace-hbase/target/htrace-hbase-4.2.0-incubating-shaded.jar
> [INFO] Dependency-reduced POM written at: 
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheHtrace/htrace-4.2.0-incubating/htrace-hbase/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> [INFO] Dependency-reduced POM written at: 
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheHtrace/htrace-4.2.0-incubating/htrace-hbase/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> [INFO] Dependency-reduced POM written at: 
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheHtrace/htrace-4.2.0-incubating/htrace-hbase/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> [INFO] Dependency-reduced POM written at: 
> /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheHtrace/htrace-4.2.0-incubating/htrace-hbase/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> …
> 
> Issue may be related to this bug? [3] However changing the pom to use shade 
> 2.4.1 didn’t fix the issue.
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 
> 1. ./bin/gen_thrift.sh
> 2. ./htrace-htraced/go/web/lib/bootstrap-3.3.1/css/bootstrap.css
> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-148
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

[Hervé Boutemy]

there were a few questions answered, and a good number of +1

this vote passes

thank you for your review and votes

Regards,

Hervé

Le mercredi 28 septembre 2016 17:25:01 Hervé Boutemy a écrit :
> Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven
> Artifact Resolver to fix a trademark issue:
> 
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/maven-aether.html
> 
> The import plan is more detailed at http://maven.apache.org/aether.html
> 
> Please vote to approve this contribution. Lazy consensus applies. If no -1
> votes are cast within the next 72 hours, the vote passes.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hervé


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

NetBeans next steps

[Bertrand Delacretaz]

Hi NetBeans mentors and initial committers,

As per [0] I have updated podlings.xml and requested creation of the
dev, users, commits and private lists via
https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator, with Geertjan and
myself as moderators [4] for now. I just took care of steps 1 to 3
from [0] so far. I'll be mostly offline until Tuesday morning, if
other mentors can take care of the remaining steps please go ahead!

We will announce the availability of these lists here once they are
created, along with subscription information. Everybody can subscribe
to these lists except for the private one for which we'll send
instructions to the dev list separately. But please wait for the lists
to be created before subscribing, obviously ;-)

NetBeans initial committers are welcome to already send in their iCLA
[1] as well as cCLA [2] if desired. The iCLA is required to get an
Apache account, while cCLA is between you and your employer but not
required by the ASF. See [3] for which Apache IDs are already taken.

-Bertrand

[0] https://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#requesting-podling
[1] https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
[2] https://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt
[3] http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
[4] https://reference.apache.org/pmc/ml

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

[Niclas Hedhman]

Agree with you on all points, Taylor.

And I am even quite surprised to see the number of people backing the
project, yet Apache is adamant to get involved. It feels a little bit like
the "Community over Code" and "Independent of any Corporate Influences"
have both received a big fat slap in their faces, and I think this hurts
the ASF more than any fallout with named corporation.

Disappointing to me...

Niclas

On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:32 AM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:

> I think the community behind this proposal is ready to accept defeat at
> this point. With DataStax' objection, the project simply can't be brought
> under the auspices of the ASF unless DataStax reverses its stance.
>
> Personally, I'm somewhat discouraged to see a company I once held in high
> regard in  terms of supporting OSS and the ASF take this action. This
> represents a further erosion of that respect. It is what it is. I can't
> fault DataStax for trying to protect their bottom line. They are well
> within their rights here. It could be considered a stain on their
> relationship with the ASF, or not.
>
> The community seems committed to moving forward with a fork, whether it is
> considered hostile or friendly. From discussions I've been privy to, if
> DataStax were to reverse their stance, this community would come back to
> the ASF in a heartbeat. There's a community behind this code, and they
> deserve the right to move forward.
>
> I think they will, unfortunately not at the ASF. At least for now. Nothing
> would please me more than to see this community be able to come to Apache.
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Sep 30, 2016, at 4:15 AM, Tom Barber  wrote:
> >
> > I like the re-licensing threat get it forked on github and prove to
> > them there is a willing community out there!
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:17 AM, P. Taylor Goetz 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd leave it open for now. I imagine/hope there are enough people aware
> of
> >> this thread that the sentiments expressed here might affect a change.
> >>
> >> -Taylor
> >>
>  On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:57 PM, Henry Saputra 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> With obvious block due to Datastax response, shall I CLOSE this DISCUSS
> >>> thread until further updates, if any?
> >>>
>  On Thursday, September 29, 2016, P. Taylor Goetz 
> >> wrote:
> 
>  For the record I'd be -1 as well unless DataStax chose to support it.
> 
>  I would like to give them time to change their mind though.
> 
>  -Taylor
> 
> >> On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Greg Stein  > > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sep 29, 2016 19:22, "P. Taylor Goetz"   > wrote:
> >> ...
> >> They can block a move to the ASF, but they can’t block a fork of the
> > project moving elsewhere. Strong communities will regroup and live
> on.
> > DataStax' reluctance to allow it could very easily be interpreted as
> a
> > rejection of the ASF governance model or the Foundation itself.
> >
> > Yes, the community could certainly launch their fork at GitHub or
> some
> > such. DataStax provided them with that ability via the ALv2 license.
> >> The
> > ASF is not a necessary step for that community.
> >
> >> ...
> >> Can we wait and see if DataStax is willing to do the right thing
> >> before
> > shooting down the proposal as a hostile fork?
> >
> > My vote remains -1. That can change, based on their choices.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -g
> 
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>  
>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>  
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

[Bertrand Delacretaz]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Ate Douma  wrote:
> ...Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended,
> please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator...

Ate said he would be offline and asked me to tally that vote.

The vote passes with +1s from the Incubator PMC members listed below,
many enthusiastic +1s from community members and no other votes.

I count the following binding +1s, feel free to fix if I forgot someone:

Ate Douma, Greg Trasuk, John D.Ament, P. Taylor Goetz, Henry Saputra,
Bertrand Delacretaz, Sergio Fernández, Greg Stein, Emmanuel Lécharny,
Jean-Frederic Clere, Jochen Wiedmann, Danese Cooper, Craig L Russell,
Edward J. Yoon, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Roman Shaposhnik, Jim
Jagielski

Congrats to the incoming NetBeans team and welcome to Apache NetBeans
(incubating) !

I'll send information about the next steps to this list shortly.

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> it's about dependencies 
> https://github.com/eclipse/aether-ant/blob/master/src/main/resources/about.html
> not about source code
> 
> not an issue

Fine by me - tanks for explaining. +1

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

[Hervé BOUTEMY]

ok, got it:
it's about dependencies 
https://github.com/eclipse/aether-ant/blob/master/src/main/resources/about.html
not about source code

not an issue

Regards,

Hervé

Le vendredi 30 septembre 2016 10:23:12 Justin Mclean a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> > AFAIK, the incoming ant repo is covered by the Sonatype software grant:
> > what precise 3rd party code are you concerned about?
> 
> From a quick look there BSD and code copyright  copyright various other
> people [1]
> 
> Copyright (c) 2000 The Apache Software Foundation.  All rights
> Copyright (c) 2001-2003, ThoughtWorks, Inc.
> Copyright (c) 2002 Extreme! Lab, Indiana University. All rights reserved.
> Copyright (c) 2004, The Codehaus
> Copyright (c) 2004-2008 QOS.ch
> 
> However it may just be these licenses refer to stuff that’s been removed,
> but I'm not sure?
> 
> All look to be permissive but they would be need to not be part of the grant
> and keep their original license and headers (assuming they exist that is).
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 
> 1.
> https://github.com/eclipse/aether-ant/tree/master/src/main/resources/about_
> files -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Unomi 1.1.0-incubating release (take 2)

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1 (binding)

Thanks to have fixed the pending issue in the previous take.

Regards
JB

On 09/30/2016 11:49 AM, Thomas Draier wrote:

Hi all,

The Unomi community has voted again for the release of Apache Unomi 1.1.0
(incubating). Previous issue with license has been fixed, the dependency to
lgpl library has been removed.

The vote thread can be found at :
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKm8eOShif-VNTp_DJOvPRdC64icvPoBj3LhBHy4qNena%2BoufA%40mail.gmail.com%3E


and the result is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKm8eOTgx7iBKpJNFUsg9iNLzTRSu%3D5EH5qEoYv4-yL1%3Df4MPg%40mail.gmail.com%3E


We ask the IPMC to vote on this release.

The artifacts to be voted on are located at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/unomi/1.1.0-incubating
Source distribution is here :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/unomi/1.1.0-incubating/unomi-1.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz

With signature :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/unomi/1.1.0-incubating/unomi-1.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc


The keys used to sign the released artifacts can be found in :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/unomi/KEYS

The tag is at:
*https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-unomi.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/unomi-root-1.1.0-incubating
*
( 619e51f509cd2fc72a9cb24357d33596094c5d25
)

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours, or until the necessary number
of votes (3 +1) is reached.

[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)

Regards,
Thomas



--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org