+1 (binding)
Thanks for making the release.
Build is fine
DISCLAIMER exists.
It has Œincubating¹ tag
NOTICE & LICENCE files exists
Regards,
Uma
On 10/5/16, 3:06 AM, "Liang Big data" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>PPMC vote for the release Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating has
Once I rebuild the site, you'll be monthly for Nov, Dec and Jan since we've
missed Oct and it doesn't make sense to rush a report in.
John
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:57 AM Makoto Yui wrote:
> John,
>
> As you mentioned, we (hivemall) did not get "Reporting reminder
+1 (binding)
Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, checksums, ran rat, checked for
unexpected binaries.
I was not able to build (not your fault - I did not have thrift
installed and didn't have the time & patience to install it).
Some notes:
* It would be useful if source-release.zip contains a
DISCLAIMER file exits
LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file look good
Artifacts has incubating tag
No executables binaries in source artifacts
Can compile from source
+1 (binding)
- Henry
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Liang Big data
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> PPMC vote for
Moving my vote from dev@
+1 binding
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - name including incubating
> - signature and hashed good
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE good
> - Files have Apache header
The vote passes with:
+1's (all binding)
Andrew Purtell
Justin Mclean
Suneel Marthi
No other votes.
Thanks everyone!
Regards,
Donald
+1 binding
- Checked sums and signatures: ok
- Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE: present, properly formatted
- No binaries in the source release (except source image files)
- Compiled from source following the build instructions (8u102)
- Manually invoked Apache RAT using
To clarify the only thing you will ever find in master is a set of commits
tagged as an RC or release, never the intermediate changes as in typical
master/snapshots.
On Oct 7, 2016, at 8:59 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
What Donald said but also we use a slightly different
+1. Checked the signatures, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and many LICENSE files (wow,
26, there must be an award for having that many). Ran rat, which seemed happy.
Alan.
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 12:23, Goden Yao wrote:
>
> Hi IPMC,
>
> HAWQ community has voted and passed RC4
On 07/10/16 13:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - name including incubating
> - signature and hashed good
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE good
> - Files have Apache header except this file [1]. Please fix in the next
> release.
This file is generated
What Donald said but also we use a slightly different process than most Apache
projects. Master is not a snapshot, we keep snapshots in the “develop” branch
until RCs start and they are the only contents of master ever—that is RCs or
releases. This process is not typical in Apache but I don’t
Hi Julian
Thanks for your kindly comments. sure, we will take care of it before next
release.
Regards
Liang
Julian Hyde-3 wrote
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, checksums, ran rat, checked for
> unexpected binaries.
>
> I was not able to build (not your fault - I did
Good call on the "carbondata-parent" file name.
It came from Maven artifact id =)
- Henry
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, checksums, ran rat, checked for
> unexpected binaries.
>
> I was not able to
+1 (binding)
Tim
On 07/10/16 02:08, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> The PPMC vote for the Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating release has passed. We
> kindly request that the IMPC now vote on the release..
>
> The PPMC vote thread is located here:
>
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- name including incubating
- signature and hashed good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- Files have Apache header except this file [1]. Please fix in the next release.
- No unexpected binary files in source release
- Can compile from source
Thanks,
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- name includes incubating
- DISCLAIMER exits
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- No unexpected binaries in source
- A source file is missing a header [1] please fix for next release. I assume
this is Apache licensed?
- Can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
1.
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked,
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- LICENSE and NOTICE is fine
- No unexpected binaries
- All source files have ASF headers (although there are a large number of file
that could possible have headers that don’t).
- Can compile from source
Very
Moving my vote from dev@
+1 binding
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked,
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - LICENSE and NOTICE is fine
> - No unexpected binaries
> - All source files have
Thanks all who helped to review the release candidate tarball.
+1 (binding)
- Justin Mclean (jus...@classsoftware.com)
- Roman Shaposhnik(ro...@shaposhnik.org)
- Alan Gates (alanfga...@gmail.com)
File one JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1087 based on
feedback but it's not a
19 matches
Mail list logo