Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

Repeating my +1. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:11 AM Myrle Krantz wrote: > Greetings Incubator, > > I propose that we graduate Apache Fineract from the Incubator. The > full text of the proposal is below. > > This is a restarted VOTE thread to correct an error in the resolution >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

+1 (binding), best of luck!! On 03/22/2017 03:11 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > Greetings Incubator, > > I propose that we graduate Apache Fineract from the Incubator. The > full text of the proposal is below. > > This is a restarted VOTE thread to correct an error in the resolution > from the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > ...I propose that we graduate Apache Fineract from the Incubator Repeating my +1 ;-) -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:51 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > On Mar 21, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > > > > > I've attached a new version of the resolution below with the WHEREAS > > attached. Do I need to restart the vote? > > > > For completeness

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:15 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:51 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> ...For completeness I would, yes, in a whole new VOTE thread. > Personally, I disagree. The proposal text we see on the incubator lists is >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> On Mar 21, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: >> >> >> I've attached a new version of the resolution below with the WHEREAS >> attached. Do I need to restart the vote? >> > > For completeness I

[VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

Greetings Incubator, I propose that we graduate Apache Fineract from the Incubator. The full text of the proposal is below. This is a restarted VOTE thread to correct an error in the resolution from the original thread. Here's the previous VOTE thread:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

+1 (binding) Thanks, Roman. P.S. This is a repeat of a previous vote. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > Greetings Incubator, > > I propose that we graduate Apache Fineract from the Incubator. The > full text of the proposal is below. > > This is a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

+1 (again from the non-binding benches). Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > +1 (binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

+1 On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > Greetings Incubator, > > I propose that we graduate Apache Fineract from the Incubator. The > full text of the proposal is below. > > This is a restarted VOTE thread to correct an error in the resolution > from the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

+1 (binding) > On Mar 22, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > Greetings Incubator, > > I propose that we graduate Apache Fineract from the Incubator. The > full text of the proposal is below. > > This is a restarted VOTE thread to correct an error in the resolution >

Slack

Can someone remind me? I thought there was a discussion a couple of months ago about allowing incubator projects to use Slack for communication. What was the final decision?

Re: [VOTE] Apache Quickstep (incubating) 0.1.0 RC7

Forwarding my vote: +1 (binding) > On Mar 22, 2017, at 12:44 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > > Forwarding my +1 too from the incubator vote. > > Cheers, > Jignesh > > On 3/21/17, 9:12 PM, "Josh Elser" els...@apache.org> wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Quickstep (incubating) 0.1.0 RC7

Forwarding my +1 too from the incubator vote. Cheers, Jignesh On 3/21/17, 9:12 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: Fwding +1 (binding) from ppmc list. On Mar 21, 2017 21:47, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: > The

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Slack support?

I don't see why its any different to other IRC channels. Apache Drill has been using it officially or unofficially for a while now (I assume they still do its been a while since I was there). On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:43 AM, James Bognar wrote: > There's interest

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.2 (incubating)

I have been told about a problem with dependency files in some sub projects with in the JAR of stage area. Going to correct this and going to use more secure signature version than SHA1. Sorry for any inconvenience, Svante 2017-03-20 22:59 GMT+01:00 Svante Schubert :

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

Absolutely +1 having seen Myrle at ApacheCon and give the lightning talk about Fineract, it looks like an amazing project. Tom On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > +1 (binding) > >

Slack support?

Hey guys Just wondering, would there be interest within the Incubator allow Slack support? Presently ASF has support for HipChat and Gitter, but I see more podlings coming in asking for Slack support. John

Re: Slack support?

Slack is becoming a standard in many non ASF communities. RabbitMQ recently switched from IRC to Slack as its "real time" conversation. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:43 PM, James Bognar wrote: > There's interest from me personally. Slack appears to be becoming >

Re: Slack support?

+1 > On Mar 22, 2017, at 5:43 PM, James Bognar wrote: > > There's interest from me personally. Slack appears to be becoming > popular. HipChat appears to be slowing down in interest. > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament >

Re: Slack support?

There's interest from me personally. Slack appears to be becoming popular. HipChat appears to be slowing down in interest. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hey guys > > Just wondering, would there be interest within the Incubator allow Slack >

Re: Slack support?

Does the Incubator actually have to *do* anything to allow Slack support? If not, and if the normal rules for chat are followed (echoing to the mailing list), then is there any need to ask? On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hey guys > > Just

Re: Slack

Hi James, There was a pretty extensive discussion on the netbeans dev list. I’d encourage you to review this thread https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2dce365d03334c82d31b12c8b3dcad1a925a2f71af75658b8d8a5a07@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E You can get all of the messages in the thread by doing

Re: Slack

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > My takeaway is that Slack not a substitute for email. But it is useful for > ping-pong communication when people are in the heat of development. > > But no decisions are made on Slack, and any discussion there

[VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. The VOTE RESULT is here:

Re: Slack support?

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:08 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > Does the Incubator actually have to *do* anything to allow Slack support? > > If not, and if the normal rules for chat are followed (echoing to the > mailing list), then is there any need to ask? > > Basically, what it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

Hi, So I'll be up front - I have mixed feelings about the download page. I love the format, it works well. I dislike that you're linking to unapproved releases, but it does have a decent warning sign. Some items I'm noticing: - The included dockerfile should reference the guacamole community

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

Hi, > Does the license of autotools need to be included in LICENSE? Good question. Other projects that use it don't add to license INAL but given the exclusion states you’re allowed to distribute under your own terms [2] I think that’s OK. > I do see reference to autotools being approved for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:11 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi, > > So I'll be up front - I have mixed feelings about the download page. I > love the format, it works well. I dislike that you're linking to > unapproved releases, but it does have a decent warning sign. > >

Re: Slack support?

Another option could be asking infra to host a rocket.chat server so we can control the instances. On 23 Mar 2017 12:03 PM, "John D. Ament" wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:08 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > > > Does the Incubator actually have to *do*

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Does the license of autotools need to be included in LICENSE? > > Good question. Other projects that use it don't add to license INAL but > given the exclusion states you’re allowed to distribute under

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > Does the license of autotools need to be included in LICENSE? > > > > Good question. Other projects that use it

Re: Slack support?

If you have a podling who wants to use slack, have them register under their podling name and deal with it. No impact on infra needed. It's like having yet another twitter account. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Evan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 PM Justin Mclean >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > > Does the license of

Re: Slack support?

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Evan Hughes wrote: > Another option could be asking infra to host a rocket.chat server so we can > control the instances. > Sorry, Evan, but hosting a chat service is not an option for Infrastructure. That would be contrary to our work on

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > > I've attached a new version of the resolution below with the WHEREAS > attached. Do I need to restart the vote? > For completeness I would, yes, in a whole new VOTE thread.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache CarbonData Project from the Incubator

My +1 (binding) [carrying my vote from carbondata private list] Sorry for my late vote on this Regards, Uma On 3/21/17, 10:18 PM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: >Hi, > >this vote passed with the following result: > >+1 (binding): Niclas Hedhman, Julian Hyde, Henry