Re: [DISCUSS] Fluo graduation as TLP

2017-07-10 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, It looks like Fluo is indeed ready to graduate but I have a question about its dev list usage. I had a look at the Fluo dev list archive, https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@fluo.apache.org There's very little going on there in terms of technical discussions and decisions, most of the tr

[ANNOUNCE] Apache AriaTosca 0.1.0-incubating released

2017-07-10 Thread Ran Ziv
The Apache AriaTosca (incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of AriaTosca 0.1.0. AriaTosca offers an easily consumable SDK and a CLI to implement TOSCA (Topology and Orchestration Specification of Cloud Applications) based solutions. The release is available at: https://www.apache.or

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Gearpump 0.8.4-incubating Release

2017-07-10 Thread Karol Brejna
The Apache Gearpump team would like to announce the release of Apache Gearpump 0.8.4-incubating. Apache Gearpump (incubating) is a reactive real-time streaming engine based on the micro-service Actor model. It provides extremely high performance stream processing while maintaining millisecond late

Re: [DISCUSS] Fluo graduation as TLP

2017-07-10 Thread Christopher
As a project which was born and raised on GitHub, Fluo makes very heavy use of the issue tracker for day to day decision making and asyncronous discussions, using GitHub issues and pull requests. We're a R-t-C community, and a lot of that discussion occurs during code reviews on the issue tracker.

Re: [DISCUSS] Gradute Streams as TLP

2017-07-10 Thread sblackmon
  In a discussion [1] on private@streams started on 7/5/17 there was strong support from PPMC including 3 mentors for the proposed charter. PPMC members not proposed for PMC had a chance to request they be added to proposed PMC, but none did. We plan to push forward and start a VOTE on the matt

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread sblackmon
  In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on the draft resolution which establishes Apache Streams as a new top-level project at the Apache Software Foundation, as follows: [ ] +1, Graduate Apache Streams from the Incubator. [ ] +0, Don't care. [ ] -1, Don't gradu

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread Suneel Marthi
+1 binding On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:09 AM, sblackmon wrote: > > In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on the > draft resolution which establishes Apache Streams as a new top-level > project at the Apache Software Foundation, as follows: > > [ ] +1, Graduate Apache S

I'll have very sporadic email connectivity for the next 3 weeks

2017-07-10 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Hi! just a quick note that I'll have very sporadic email connectivity for the next 3 weeks. This pretty much means that all the email to the lists will go unnoticed until end of July. If there's something urgent you can try emailing me directly, but no guarantees. See y'all back in Aug! Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread Pierre Smits
+1 Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > +1 binding > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:09 AM, sblackmon wrote: > > > > > In

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread John D. Ament
+1 On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:28 AM sblackmon wrote: > > In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on the > draft resolution which establishes Apache Streams as a new top-level > project at the Apache Software Foundation, as follows: > > [ ] +1, Graduate Apache Streams fr

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread sblackmon
+1 (binding) On July 10, 2017 at 10:40:20 AM, John D. Ament (johndam...@apache.org) wrote: +1 On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:28 AM sblackmon wrote: > > In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on the > draft resolution which establishes Apache Streams as a new top-level

[NOTICE] Migrating to the new Incubator Website Wednesday night

2017-07-10 Thread John D. Ament
All, Just as a heads up we will be migrating to the new Incubator website Wednesday night, 9pm Eastern. I expect during this time some links may break and other stuff not work quite right. Please be patient and shout out when you see something. John

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread Joern Kottmann
+1 Jörn On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:43 PM, sblackmon wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On July 10, 2017 at 10:40:20 AM, John D. Ament (johndam...@apache.org) wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:28 AM sblackmon wrote: > >> >> In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Jul 10, 2017, at 11:09 AM, sblackmon wrote: > > > In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on the > draft resolution which establishes Apache Streams as a new top-level project > at the Apache Software Foundation, as follows: > > [ ] +1,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread Debo Dutta (dedutta)
+1 On 7/10/17, 10:27 AM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: +1 (binding) -Taylor > On Jul 10, 2017, at 11:09 AM, sblackmon wrote: > > > In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on the draft resolution which establishes Apache Streams as a new

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) Ate On 2017-07-10 17:09, sblackmon wrote: In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on the draft resolution which establishes Apache Streams as a new top-level project at the Apache Software Foundation, as follows: [ ] +1, Graduate Apache Streams from th

[VOTE] Recommend Apache Fluo graduation as TLP to Board

2017-07-10 Thread Christopher
Hello IPMC, The recent DISCUSS thread on the topic of Fluo's graduation has been open for at least 72 hours, and I believe all questions have been answered and issues addressed at this point. With the discussion having settled down, I would now like to call for a recommendation VOTE to present th

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-10 Thread Greg Stein
Sure. As I noted "optional at compile-time", and it certainly looks that way. We just don't want to force downstream users to get adversely-licensed products just to build our software. And MXNET_USE_DIST_KVSTORE meets that requirement. Cheers, -g On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Dominic Divaka

Re: [VOTE] Recommend Apache Fluo graduation as TLP to Board

2017-07-10 Thread Josh Elser
+1 (binding) Be on your way :) On 7/10/17 4:44 PM, Christopher wrote: Hello IPMC, The recent DISCUSS thread on the topic of Fluo's graduation has been open for at least 72 hours, and I believe all questions have been answered and issues addressed at this point. With the discussion having sett

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-10 Thread Alan Gates
Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > Hi IPMC member, > > > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. > We kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. > > > The PPMC vote thread is located here: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Fluo graduation as TLP

2017-07-10 Thread Josh Elser
To clarify just in case it's not clear (I had to read it twice to get it): notifications@f.a.o[1] is what Christopher meant by "the notifications list" and is probably the discussion you're looking for, Bertrand :) [1] https://lists.apache.org/list.html?notificati...@fluo.apache.org On 7/10/1

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread Davor Bonaci
+1 On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ate > > > On 2017-07-10 17:09, sblackmon wrote: > >> In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on >> the draft resolution which establishes Apache Streams as a new top-level >> project at the Apache

[RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-10 Thread Ruilong Huo
Hi IPMC members, The Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release IPMC vote is now closed and has passed as follows: [4] +1 (binding) votes [0] -1 (binding) votes Overall vote breakdown is as below: Roman Shaposhnik +1 (non-binding) John D. Ament +1 (non-binding) Justin Mclean

Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Overall vote breakdown is as below: > Roman Shaposhnik +1 (non-binding) > John D. Ament +1 (non-binding) > Justin Mclean +1 (binding) > Alan Gates +1 (non-binding) Why are the 3 votes marked as non binding? All 4 people are on the incubator PMC and t

Re:Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-10 Thread HuoRuilong
Hi Justin, Thanks Justin! If IPMC vote by default is binding vote, I will correct the announcement. There was only one explicit +1 binding vote from you and others are just +1. So I thought they were non-binding vote:) Best regards, Ruilong Huo At 2017-07-11 11:06:45, "Justin Mclean" wrote:

[RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-10 Thread Ruilong Huo
Hi IPMC members, Some refinement are done based on previous announcement for vote result of Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release by counting the +1 vote from IPMC members as binding vote. The Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release IPMC vote is now closed and has passed as follows: [4] +1 (bin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > There was only one explicit +1 binding vote from you and others are just +1. > So I thought they were non-binding vote:) In which case (if they were non binding votes) the vote would not of passed as you need 3 +1 binding votes and more +1’s than -1’s to pass. Thanks, Justin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

2017-07-10 Thread Julian Hyde
Ruilong (and others), If in doubt, look people up at https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html . If a voter’s page has “PMC member of … incubator” then their vote is binding. E.g. https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-10 Thread Dominic Divakaruni
Greg, et al, do you believe this is a non-issue and resolved based on what Mu has said? On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Mu Li wrote: > ZeroMQ is used only if setting `USE_DIST_KVSTORE = 1` during compilation. > In default, it is 0. > > The source codes are close to the following: > > #if MXNET_U