Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi, > IMO, adding license information along with copyrights in NOTICE sounds > reasonable because comparing LICENSE with NOTICE is hard when divided > while it may be redundant. In general only LICENSE should contain license information [1] as the NOTICE file is informational only [2], (see d.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

If Coral as our project name is fine, I will start voting in a couple of days. Let me know if you have any concern. Thanks. -Gon On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > Thanks for the comments, JB! > My replies are inlined below. > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, sorry to be a little bit late on this. It's a very interesting proposal. It sounds pretty close to the portability layer we want to add in Apache Beam. I would love to see interaction between the two communities. I have two minor questions: 1. about the name: Onyx sounds very generic and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Thanks for the comments, JB! My replies are inlined below. On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > sorry to be a little bit late on this. > > It's a very interesting proposal. It sounds pretty close to the portability > layer we want to add in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

On 30 January 2018 at 03:02, Makoto Yui wrote: > Justin, > > 2018-01-30 11:33 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean : >> You should be careful following other TLPs as examples and follow the >> instructions here. [1] If you want some good example that the HTTP project >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, Coral is a good name ! Does the code belong to Seoul National University ? In that case, in addition of your ICLA, we would need a SGA (it's not blocker for the project bootstrapping or code donation, but we, at least, will need it later for graduation). On the other hand, if the committers

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.5.0-incubating (RC2)

HI, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is OK but missing a license [1][2] - please update year in NOTICE - all source files have ASF headers - no unexpected binary files in release - Can compile from source I did get some failing tests btw, I just ran again

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi, >> IMO, adding license information along with copyrights in NOTICE sounds >> reasonable because comparing LICENSE with NOTICE is hard when divided >> while it may be redundant. > > In general only LICENSE should contain license information [1] as the NOTICE > file is informational only [2],

Incubator PMC Board Report Timeline - February 2018

February 2018 Incubator report timeline: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2018 Wed February 07 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun February 11 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun February 11 -- Summary due by end of day Tue February 13 -- Mentor signoff