Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-20 Thread larry mccay
+1 On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:33 PM Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:20 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Looking forward to this podling! > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Feb 20, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Antoine

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-20 Thread John D. Ament
+1 to accept the proposal On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:50 PM Antoine Toulme wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. > > We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project in >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-20 Thread Byung-Gon Chun
+1 (binding) On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:20 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Looking forward to this podling! > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Feb 20, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava

Re: March 2019 Incubator report timeline

2019-02-20 Thread Tan,Zhongyi
got thanks for reminder > 在 2019年2月21日,07:10,Justin Mclean 写道: > > Hi, > >> I think that Pinot is missing from the list. I can see Pinot within the >> contents but not on the "Shepherd Assignments” > > Might a bug, you were supposed to stop reopening monthly this month but > missed out on

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

2019-02-20 Thread VP Brand
Wearing my VP, Brand Management hat: The fields of use are sufficiently close that I would not be prepared to approve the use of Apache Cava as a project name. I strongly recommend that a new name for the project is chosen *before* the podling is created as renames create large amounts of work

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

2019-02-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
Ah yes... agreed. > On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:33 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Jim, > > The potential conflict is a small San Francisco blockchain software comp[any > called kava.io . > > Regards, > Dave > >> On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> +1 keeping

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

2019-02-20 Thread Antoine Toulme
Hello all, Thank you for your feedback. We will move to change the name. At this point, it looks like the project itself is a good fit for the incubator. I will open a vote for acceptance into the incubator. In parallel or quickly after, I will also hold a vote to help select a name amongst the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-20 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
+1 binding with the condition that a new name is picked before the onboarding starts to lighten the load on the foundation (especially Infra). On 2/20/2019 2:50 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The > proposal itself can

[VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-20 Thread Piyush Ghai
Dear community, This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0, release candidate RC3. Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. Vote thread :

[VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-20 Thread Antoine Toulme
Hi everyone, we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project in [2]. I will kick off a vote to pick a name based on the proposals made there. According to the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-20 Thread Dave Fisher
+1 (binding) Looking forward to this podling! Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 20, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. > > We discussed

March 2019 Incubator report timeline

2019-02-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Here’s the timeline for March [1] Wed March 06 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun March 10 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun March 10 -- Summary due by end of day Tue March 12 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day Wed March 13 -- Report submitted to Board

mod_pagespeed podling website

2019-02-20 Thread Rich Bowen
It was mentioned in the Serf board report today that the mod_pagespeed podling does not have a website. Or, possibly, that the link from http://incubator.apache.org/projects/pagespeed.html to http://pagespeed.incubator.apache.org/ is incorrect? Can either the Mentors or PPMC members for this

Re: March 2019 Incubator report timeline

2019-02-20 Thread Seunghyun Lee
Hi Justin, I think that Pinot is missing from the list. I can see Pinot within the contents but not on the "Shepherd Assignments" Can you add us? Best, Seunghyun On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:15 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Here’s the timeline for March [1] > > Wed March 06 -- Podling

Ask for the write permission for incubator wiki

2019-02-20 Thread Seunghyun Lee
Hi all, May I have the access to the incubator wiki so that I can update the podling report? My username is "SeunghyunLee " Best, Seunghyun

Re: March 2019 Incubator report timeline

2019-02-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I think that Pinot is missing from the list. I can see Pinot within the > contents but not on the "Shepherd Assignments” Might a bug, you were supposed to stop reopening monthly this month but missed out on an earlier December report. > Can you add us? Shepherd assignment are random and

Re: Ask for the write permission for incubator wiki

2019-02-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > May I have the access to the incubator wiki so that I can update the > podling report? Done. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-20 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov
Hi Lars, Thank you for proposing and driving this topic. Surely, we can wait, but I'm absolutely sure more committers gives a greater variety of technical visions. Moreover, we didn't change anything essential in the proposal. I'm pretty sure a number of contributors may and will come later.