Hi all,
Since Apache NetBeans (incubating) entered the Apache incubator in October
2016, we have completed 3 releases, integrated the NetBeans community into
working in the Apache Way, gradually migrated donations received from
Oracle to Apache, and are not complete in that process since there
My $.02.
Apache is sorely in need of a portal similar to StackOverflow. I,
like many other software developers, primarily use Google for finding
answers. 90% of the time those answers are going to be found on
StackOverflow. Answers on mailing lists are not going to show up in
Google results,
Agree with james.
Most of us search for an answer in Google.. which eventually take us to
stackoverflow.
Apache Mailing list answers are very rare in Google results.
Stackoverflow like portal could become next podling for incubator.
-Vinay
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019, 7:05 pm James Bognar, wrote:
>
Hi -
> On Apr 5, 2019, at 7:49 AM, Serge Huber wrote:
>
> If I may contribute my view here.
>
> Using StackOverflow is mostly great for StackOverflow. The more people go
> there to post questions and get answers really helps mostly StackOverflow's
> bottom line. Also, StackOverflow does NOT
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:35 PM James Bognar wrote:
> ...Apache is sorely in need of a portal similar to StackOverflow...
What makes you think we need our own service, as opposed to helping
our users where they are?
As Ted said in this thread:
> Just subscribe to appropriate tags on stack
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 15:58, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> > On Apr 5, 2019, at 7:49 AM, Serge Huber wrote:
> >
> > If I may contribute my view here.
> >
> > Using StackOverflow is mostly great for StackOverflow. The more people go
> > there to post questions and get answers really helps
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 6:35 AM James Bognar wrote:
> My $.02.
>
> Apache is sorely in need of a portal similar to StackOverflow. I,
> like many other software developers, primarily use Google for finding
> answers. 90% of the time those answers are going to be found on
> StackOverflow.
If I may contribute my view here.
Using StackOverflow is mostly great for StackOverflow. The more people go
there to post questions and get answers really helps mostly StackOverflow's
bottom line. Also, StackOverflow does NOT allow to simply link to sites for
answers, which is smart on their part
Hi,
Sorry the bit I pasted doesn’t make sense on it’s own It should of started with
"for other than personal, noncommercial use is expressly prohibited …”
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Justin,
THis is a huge and important point.
I had completely forgotten that SO had these abusive terms.
To summarize, just so everybody is clear, according to their terms of
service *anything* you put on SO is the property of SO. That is sooo
completely anti-Apache, that I have a hard time
I think we should get legal clarity if folks disagree, but providing
content under CC license does not stop you from also licensing it under ASL.
IOTW, I can give an answer, license that answer simultaneously to two
parties.
Agree that we cant lift other people's content from SO based on its
HI,
You also might want to note that anything contributed to stack overflow is
licensed under the CC-SA-3.0 [1] which may causes issues. [2] For instance code
from a stack overflow post can’t be included in a Apache project's code base.
In edition also note "noncommercial use is expressly
Hi,
+ 1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE exists
- No unexpected binary files in release
- All source files have ASF headers
- Can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
not saying it is practical but what I was getting at with the "also
licensing to ASF" thing would be a feature request to SO similar to github
contributing file integration.
ASF members could choose to license to ASF by default and have a badge put
on their content accordingly.
This doesn't
+1 from my side. This looks like a small but very viable community to me.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 6:38 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks! My concern is that in the past the IPMC has graduated podlings with 5
> PMC members that fairly quickly ended up in the Attic.
>
Hi Ted,
> On Apr 5, 2019, at 3:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> Justin,
>
> THis is a huge and important point.
>
> I had completely forgotten that SO had these abusive terms.
>
> To summarize, just so everybody is clear, according to their terms of
> service *anything* you put on SO is the
Hi,
> Not by my reading. Contributions to the content are licensed to SO by a grant
> similar to the way contributions to Apache are licensed by a grant. It's not
> copyright assignment, it's "just a grant.
I believe they become a little more friendlier and it use to be that they did
own
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE ok
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers
- Can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
+1 - looks good to me
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
