Hi,
> For Celix is it okay to continue if we update the NOTICE file and add the
> following statement?:
>
> This product includes software developed at
> Thales Nederland B.V. (https://www.thalesgroup.com/nl).
That sounds fine to me, but it depends on the original headers of on those
files or i
Hi,
> Thanks for reviewing. Isn't this actually part of the IP clearance form
> which describes the following:
>> Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been
> updated to reflect the new ASF copyright.
I believe the intention is that you fill in the date when it is done, n
Hi Justin,
Thanks for reviewing. Isn't this actually part of the IP clearance form
which describes the following:
> Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been
updated to reflect the new ASF copyright.
Having a look at other IP clearances they are more or less doing the sa
I have put the wrong link of Maven 2 staging repository, now it's updated
to:
Maven 2 staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheshardingsphere-1022/org/apache/shardingsphere/
Zhang Yonglun 于2019年8月20日周二 下午6:16写道:
> Hello all,
>
> This is a call for vote t
Ok. Thanks for guidance and clarification.
> On Aug 21, 2019, at 12:45 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I asked you about this after you caught the missing disclaimer, but didn’t
>> hear back inside of 24 hours so I made a judgement call—I hope I did the
>> right thing.
>
> Well it
Hi,
> I asked you about this after you caught the missing disclaimer, but didn’t
> hear back inside of 24 hours so I made a judgement call—I hope I did the
> right thing.
Well it not the wrong thing, it just something that I don;t think has happened
before.
> My logic in this case was that b
Hi,
Sone thoughts inline.
> Documentation does not solve the problem.
I agree it doesn’t solve the whole problem. But it may give time poor mentors
more time to do other things if they can easily reference collective knowledge
on these issues.
> If someone doesn't already "get" this stuff the
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the attention on this VOTE.
I asked you about this after you caught the missing disclaimer, but didn’t hear
back inside of 24 hours so I made a judgement call—I hope I did the right
thing. Would appreciate any guidance on my logic here.
My logic in this case was that bec
Hi,
It's a little unusual as they voted before the binary was changed so this
really should have been two seperate vote threads. But I ‘m fine if you count
them this time.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubs
Hi,
> The pull request containing the donation can be found at:
> https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/39
I can see that the copyright owner / headers have been replaces by ASF ones.
This is best done after accepting the donation and then adding that copyright
to NOTICE.
Thanks,
Justin
---
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes fine
- DISCLAIMER exists and uses the WIP text. you also might want to fill in
#Podling-Name#
- LICENSE is OK. Do you know what is missing?
- NOTICE is fine
- NO binary files in release
- All source files have ASF header
-
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE file (no 3rd party software included)
- No binary files
- All source files have ASF headers
- Can compile from source
This is as about as simple as it get to review :-)
Than
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE fine (but see below)
- All source files have ASF header
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source
I think you may have the wrong license in LICENSE for bootstrap as
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes fine
- DISCLAIMER exists, although you may want to use the DISCLAIMER_WIP [8]
- LICENSE is probably missing a few things (se below)
- NOTICE is fine
- No unexpected binary files
- I didn’t check compiling from source
LiCENS
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:06 AM Supun Kamburugamuve wrote:
>
> We are thinking about proposing a project to the incubator. Would this be
> open to such a project?
Given that we're already oversubscribed -- we can only allow existing
podlings at this point.
Thanks,
Roman.
>
> Best,
> Supun..
>
>
Hi All!
thanks a million for this tremendous interest in Podling's Shark Tank.
We now have:
ApacheCON NA in Las Vegas:
Daffodil
ShardingSphere
Heron
DLab
IoTDB
Daffodil
Ratis
DataSketches
ApacheCON EU in Berlin:
MorphL
ShardingSphere
DLab
IoTD
At Apache Myriad we need some help, our more active mentor is really
busy right now.
Myriad => Hadoop YARN (Big Data) and the awesome Mesos, what else! ;-)
--
Javi Roman
Twitter: @javiromanrh
GitHub: github.com/javiroman
Linkedin: es.linkedin.com/in/javiroman
Big Data Blog: dataintensive.info
Apa
Julian,
Apache Tamaya could use help. My activity has been reduced pretty heavily as
of late.
John
On 2019/08/13 06:21:54, Julian Feinauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this goes to the IPMC as well as to podlings watching this list.
> I just recently became IPMC member and am currently pretty active in
+1
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 00:39, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> 20 Ağu 2019 Sal, saat 08:04 tarihinde Roy Lenferink
> şunu yazdı:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Apache Celix received a donation which adds an additional pubsub admin
> > to Celix. This pubsub admi
+1
- code compiles
- incubating in name
- LICENSE, NOTICE is fine
- No unexpected binary files
Thanks,
William
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:30 PM Roman Leventov
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 17:05, Furkan KAMACI
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > I checked:
> >
> > - Incub
+1
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 17:05, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 from me.
>
> I checked:
>
> - Incubating in name
> - LICENSE is fine
> - NOTICE is fine
> - No unexpected binary files
> - Code compiles and tests successfully run
>
> One objection: DISCLAIMER file should be renamed to DISCLAIME
Hi,
+1 from me.
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- LICENSE is fine
- NOTICE is fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Code compiles and tests successfully run
One objection: DISCLAIMER file should be renamed to DISCLAIMER-WIP and link
at content should point to datasketches.
Kind Regards,
Furkan K
Hello all,
This is a call for vote to release Apache ShardingSphere (Incubating)
version 4.0.0-RC2.
The Apache ShardingSphere community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache ShardingSphere (Incubating) version 4.0.0-RC2.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and
I think this proposal should be hold a little longer.
The champion of this proposal is not a member of IPMC yet.
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Apache SkyWalking, Apache ShardingSphere(Incubating), Zipkin
Twitter, wusheng1108
Zhijie Shen 于2019年8月20日周二 下午2:24写道:
> Hi folks,
>
> With 7 +1 binding votes, 1 +1 non
Hi,
+1 from me.
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- Checked PGP signatures
- Checked Checksums
- Code compiles and tests successfully run
One objection: you should fix the binary versions at next release as Javi
Roman
25 matches
Mail list logo