Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Adding trademarks@ > > See https://prestodb.io/docs/current/connector.html > This is a great point but to be clear, that https://prestodb.io/ is the Presto project in the Presto Foundation,

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

Adding trademarks@ See https://prestodb.io/docs/current/connector.html There are 11 Apache products with trademark issues. This issue is extensive enough that a coordinated response is required. these can take long enough that this issue should not delay graduation. > > The Presto

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, Thanks for that information. > Presto references to Pinot have been replaced by Apache Pinot [3]. We do > not own the Presto project, so cannot control other references such as > Cassandra, etc. But it is up to the project to make sure that its brand and trademarks are correctly used by

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

Hello Justin, Sheng & IPMC Thanks so much for reviewing our proposal and your questions and suggestions. Please find our response below, and let us know if you have any questions, and suggest next steps. Decision process for PMC: We follow discussion + voting protocol for adding new PMCs. We

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

That’s a relief. Thank you for checking. > On Jun 16, 2021, at 15:58, John D. Ament wrote: > > Yeah apologies, you're good so never mind me > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting > > >> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 9:41 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> I thought you needed 3 +1s. Thanks for

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

Yeah apologies, you're good so never mind me https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 9:41 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > I thought you needed 3 +1s. Thanks for the clarification. > > > On Jun 16, 2021, at 15:38, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:40

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

I thought you needed 3 +1s. Thanks for the clarification. > On Jun 16, 2021, at 15:38, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:40 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> Thanks all, >> >> The vote has concluded. >> >> The results are as follows: >> 4 +1: Furkan Kamaci (binding), Antoine

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:40 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > Thanks all, > > The vote has concluded. > > The results are as follows: > 4 +1: Furkan Kamaci (binding), Antoine Toulme (binding), John D. Ament > (binding), Xun Liu (non-binding). > 0 +0 > 1 -1: Justin Mclean > > With JB and Atri's votes

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kyuubi into the Apache Incubator

+1 On 2021/06/14 13:57:27, Willem Jiang wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Kyuubi[1], I would like to call a > VOTE to accept Kyuubi into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring Kyuubi into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

+1(binding). Sorry, missed voting earlier On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:10 PM Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Thanks all, > > The vote has concluded. > > The results are as follows: > 4 +1: Furkan Kamaci (binding), Antoine Toulme (binding), John D. Ament > (binding), Xun Liu (non-binding). > 0 +0 > 1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

+1 (binding) Sorry I was late on this vote. Regards JB > Le 16 juin 2021 à 08:36, Furkan KAMACI a écrit : > > Hi, > > +1 (binding, carrying over my vote). > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 3:54 PM John D. Ament wrote: > >> Thanks for clarifying everything. I

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

Thanks all, The vote has concluded. The results are as follows: 4 +1: Furkan Kamaci (binding), Antoine Toulme (binding), John D. Ament (binding), Xun Liu (non-binding). 0 +0 1 -1: Justin Mclean The release vote passes. I will release the artifacts and prepare an email to announce@. Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

Hi, +1 (binding, carrying over my vote). Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 3:54 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Thanks for clarifying everything. I think we are in good working order > then and here's my +1 (binding) to release. > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:52 AM Antoine Toulme