Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.11.0-rc1

+1 (binding) I checked: - Download links are valid - Checksums and signatures are OK - LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files exist - Incubating in the project names - No unexpected binary files -- Sincerely, Liang Zhang (John) Apache ShardingSphere Willem Jiang 于2022年6月21日周二

Re: Short process intro for exec's?

It seems that to download the slides, as opposed to just view them, you have to set up a "Scribd" account which costs money if you forget to cancel within the first 30 days. I doubt that was your intent :) The slides look great BTW, exactly what I can use as my starting point internally. On

Re: Short process intro for exec's?

Here’s the original Google slides. Feel free to make a copy. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Q28ExXCggbsstqEa1KjnCuA3Ws4XWfR7itQzPmab8vk/edit?usp=sharing Julian > On Jun 21, 2022,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.11.0-rc1

Hi, In this release I noticed a number of png files that look to be icons or logos. Where did these files come from and how are they licensed? Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC4]

Hi, The vote closes now as over 72hr have passed. The vote PASSES with 3 0 (+1 non-binding) votes from the PPMC, 3 (+1 binding) vote from the IPMC, 0 (+1 non-binding) votes from the developer community, No further +1, 0 or -1 votes. Thanks, Alin Jerpelea -Original Message- From:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ShenYu(Incubating) as a TLP

Hi, Thanks to everyone for the vote. I made a mistake when describing the project in the resolution template. I only described the functionality of the project and not the scope of the project. It doesn't fit the standard template. The previous project description as follows: related to Apache

[CANCEL][VOTE] Graduate Apache ShenYu(Incubating) as a TLP

Dear Apache Incubator Community, In the previous vote[1] thread. I made a mistake when describing the project in the resolution template. I only described the functionality of the project and not the scope of the project. It doesn't fit the standard template. The previous project description as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.11.0-rc1

Hi, Just as a reminder, in the community vote only two mentor votes look good. Most of the others are pointless +1, the community should guide everyone to follow the steps of [1] to check, this is a very important thing and something podlings need to learn during incubation. Another is the

[RESULTS] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC4]

Hi all, The vote to release Apache NuttX (incubating) 10.3.0-rc4 is now closed. Thanks to those that took the time to review and vote. The release has passed with 3 +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding: +1 Nathan Hartman +1 Justin Mclean +1 Duo Zhang Vote thread

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache MXNet (incubating) as a Top Level Project

+1 binding. Looking forward to it! On 2022/05/02 17:29:53 Joe Evans wrote: > Hi Apache Incubator Community, > > Apache MXNet (incubating) recently held a community discussion[1] and > vote[2] to graduate to a top level project. The community vote passed[3] > and we would like to start a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis(Incubating) 1.1.2-RC1

+1(non-binding) I have checked: [OK] Download links are valid. [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [OK] There are LICENSE and NOTICE files. [OK] There is a DISCLAIMER file. [OK] The year in the NOTICE file is correct. [OK] All text files have ASF license. [OK] No unlicensed compiled

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache InLong(incubating) 1.2.0-incubating

Hi all, The Apache InLong(incubating) community is pleased to announce that Apache InLong(incubating) 1.2.0-incubating has been released! Apache InLong is a one-stop integration framework for massive data that provides automatic, secure, distributed, and efficient data publishing and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.11.0-rc1

+1 (binding) I checked: - Download links are valid. - Checksums and signatures are OK for me. - LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files exist - No unexpected binary files - ASF License add in the source files There are some small issue We don't need add DISCLAIMER information into the Dockerfile in the