Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celeborn(Incubating) 0.3.2-incubating-rc1

2023-12-27 Thread Keyong Zhou
Hi Justin, Thanks for your input! > There is some overlap with some files with [1]; this is concerning as these files are under a GPL license. Would you happen to know who has copied from whom here? If ASF files have been re-licensed under the GPL license, what is the PMC doing about this? What

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) Persistence R2DBC 1.0.0-RC1

2023-12-27 Thread PJ Fanning
Would any of the Pekko mentors or indeed, any Incubator PMC members have time to review this Pekko RC? It marks the final set of Pekko modules that have yet to be released. On 2023/12/20 23:10:25 Matthew de Detrich wrote: > Carrying over my +1 vote from >

[DISCUSS] Branding in Thirdparty Platform Distribution

2023-12-27 Thread tison
Hi, The Distribution Guidelines[1] in ASF Incubator website wrote: * Artifacts show up on https://www.npmjs.com/package/apache-; version page. * Artifacts need to be placed in https://pypi.org/project/apache-;. To comply with ASF release and distributions please ensure the following: Both

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) Persistence R2DBC 1.0.0-RC1

2023-12-27 Thread PJ Fanning
The vote passes with 3 binding +1s. Vote Thread https://lists.apache.org/thread/rschhjdlqqqjhngbhgn5z8hr4jkyvvbh Votes Duo Zhang Matthew de Detrich PJ Fanning I will proceed with the release and make the announcements over the coming days.

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

2023-12-27 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 8:09 PM tison wrote: > Hi, > > The new podling Fury depends on jmh[1] which is licensed under GPLv2 > with "CLASSPATH" EXCEPTION. > Just to confirm, are you referring to the code under [benchmark]? > > IIRC Flink ever factored out its benchmark code into a separate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) Persistence R2DBC 1.0.0-RC1

2023-12-27 Thread PJ Fanning
Thanks Duo Zhang. I'll see about getting some build docs ready for the next RC. I did include this in the vote email but it is definitely better to have proper build docs. {snip} Some of the tests rely on postgresql running locally on port 5432 and the DDL is at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) 1.2.0 rc1

2023-12-27 Thread Yu Li
Thanks for the clarification Willem and Justin, I've updated the Incubator Release Checklist document [1] accordingly. I hereby withdraw my -1 and below is my updated vote: +1 (binding) - Checked sum and signatures: OK - Checked DISCLAIMER file exists: OK - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pekko(incubating) Persistence R2DBC 1.0.0-RC1

2023-12-27 Thread Duo Zhang
+1 binding Checked sigs and sums: Matched LICENSE and NOTICE: Looks fine DISCLAIMER: In place Built from src: I pulled the docker image 'eclipse-temurin-focal-11.0.21_9_1.9.8_3.3.1' and then type sbt, passed Run tests: I just typed test in the sbt shell but it failed with 'Cannot connect to

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

2023-12-27 Thread John D. Ament
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 11:38 AM tison wrote: > > application, a developer has preinstalled the JDK (or using a manager of > > some kind to install it - so not something we're forcing upon them). In > > No. To running a Java Application in a normal way, the JRE is > required. Saying "not

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

2023-12-27 Thread tison
> For instance, if your maven build is `-Pbenchmark` and it's clear > that the user needs to include this license when compiling from source. Yeah. I'm going to collaborate with Fury to follow this approach and document clearly how a developer can intentionally run benchmark with JMH as a dep.

Re: [DISCUSS] Branding in Thirdparty Platform Distribution

2023-12-27 Thread tison
I found the original discussion for this guideline[1], and I respect that the Incubator did such pioneer works to provide a base to discuss and evolve. The proposal here is to improve the expression on NPM / PyPI for the package name to be either: 1. apache-projectname 2. projectname or loosely

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celeborn(Incubating) 0.3.2-incubating-rc1

2023-12-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > We just checked their repo and found the PR[1] which added Celeborn's code > in their repo. We got in touch with them and they told us that the code was > deleted a month ago. I also checked their release[2] and didn't find > Celeborn's code in their source ball. So I guess this is no

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

2023-12-27 Thread tison
Hi John, Glad to hear your feedback. Reply inline: > In the case of JMH, the repository I linked above forces the user to download > the additional dependency from maven central (or similar repository) rather > than relying on the system preinstalled library. >From a technical view, this is not

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

2023-12-27 Thread tison
> application, a developer has preinstalled the JDK (or using a manager of > some kind to install it - so not something we're forcing upon them). In No. To running a Java Application in a normal way, the JRE is required. Saying "not something we're forcing upon them" sounds sophistry. Best,

Re: [DISCUSS] Branding in Thirdparty Platform Distribution

2023-12-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I’ll note these guidelines were discussed and voted on by the IPMC a while back. Legal and trademarks also reviewed them and had input, and the work is based on existing policy and years of discussion. They, however, have only had minor updates since being formed. Kind Regards, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Branding in Thirdparty Platform Distribution

2023-12-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The proposal here is to improve the expression on NPM / PyPI for the > package name to be either: > > 1. apache-projectname > 2. projectname Existing ASF policy has this to say: - "All PMCs must to comply with the Apache Project Branding Requirements.” [1] - “PMCs are directly responsible

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenDAL(incubating) 0.44.0-rc.1 - Incubator Vote Round 1

2023-12-27 Thread Liuqing Yue
Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache OpenDAL community has voted and approved the release of Apache OpenDAL(incubating) 0.44.0-rc.1. We now kindly request the IPMC members review and vote for this release. OpenDAL is a data access layer that allows users to easily and efficiently retrieve data from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celeborn(Incubating) 0.3.2-incubating-rc1

2023-12-27 Thread Cheng Pan
Hi Justin > - LICENSE mentions 1 3rd party file from Guava; however, the NOTICE lists > both Apache Spark and Apache Flink, so I think other files may have been > copied into the code base, and LICENSE is missing information or the NOTICE > is incorrect. > - This file [2] seems to have been

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

2023-12-27 Thread ShaoFeng Shi
Hi Rakesh, Yeah, the team aware that, they plan to merge the Trino plugin into the main repository at some point of time, depends on its maturity. The Hive plugin is not on current roadmap I think, but this is open for discussion. Best regards, Shaofeng Shi 史少锋 Apache Kylin PMC, Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

2023-12-27 Thread ShaoFeng Shi
Hi Justin, Yeah, 12 months is a little tough; I have discussed this with the team, and updated the proposal to 18 months. Best regards, Shaofeng Shi 史少锋 Apache Kylin PMC, Apache Incubator PMC, Email: shaofeng...@apache.org Apache Kylin FAQ: https://kylin.apache.org/docs/gettingstarted/faq.html

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

2023-12-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Thanks for your reply to report potential branding issues. The PMC is > actively responding to these comments. > > * https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/3829/files > * https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/3830/files > *

Re: [DISCUSS] Branding in Thirdparty Platform Distribution

2023-12-27 Thread Xuanwo
For the platforms npm, PyPI, crates.io, and NuGet, the situation is somewhat different: We deliver libraries instead binaries. Users should run `npm install xxx`, `pip install xxx`, or `cargo add xxx` to include our library in their dependency list. Users should write code in their own

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

2023-12-27 Thread ShaoFeng Shi
Hi Junping, Thank you for the suggestion. I have discussed this with the team, they agree with this. I have updated abstract part of the proposal. The slogan on the document website will be updated later. Best regards, Shaofeng Shi 史少锋 Apache Kylin PMC, Apache Incubator PMC, Email:

Re: [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal

2023-12-27 Thread Kent Yao
+1 We have been using Glutin with Apache Kyuubi and Apache Spark at NetEase for about a year now. It's a promising project. And I'm glad to be one of the nominated mentors. Thanks, Kent Yao On 2023/12/28 03:25:56 ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Yeah, 12 months is a little tough; I have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenDAL(incubating) 0.44.0-rc.1 - Incubator Vote Round 1

2023-12-27 Thread Xuanwo
Carry my non-binding +1 VOTE from the dev@o.a.o On Thu, Dec 28, 2023, at 13:12, Liuqing Yue wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > The Apache OpenDAL community has voted and approved the release of Apache > OpenDAL(incubating) 0.44.0-rc.1. We now kindly request the IPMC members > review and vote for

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

2023-12-27 Thread tison
Hi Justin, Thanks for your reply to report potential branding issues. The PMC is actively responding to these comments. * https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/3829/files * https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/pull/3830/files *

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

2023-12-27 Thread Xuanwo
> I noticed the domain opendal.databend.rs mentioned there. Who owns that > domain? The domain `opendal.databend.rs` is owned by Databend Labs and was used as the primary domain before OpenDAL entered the incubation stage. The PMC will coordinate with Databend Labs to ensure that all instances

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

2023-12-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The domain `opendal.databend.rs` is owned by Databend Labs and was used as > the > primary domain before OpenDAL entered the incubation stage. The PMC will > coordinate > with Databend Labs to ensure that all instances are updated to > `opendal.apache.org`. It would be best if the

Re: [DISCUSS] Branding in Thirdparty Platform Distribution

2023-12-27 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > Users should run `npm install xxx`, `pip install xxx`, or `cargo add xxx` > to include our library in their dependency list. Users should write code > in their own libraries or applications using statements such as `use xxx` > or `import xxx`. Adding the prefixes `apache-` or `asf-`

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache OpenDAL (incubating) as a TLP - Incubator

2023-12-27 Thread tison
Hi Justin, > I noticed the domain opendal.databend.rs mentioned there. Who owns that > domain? As an analogy, think of answer.dev and answer.apache.org. You are in the thread of a similar situation[1]. Best, tison. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/sj5nv4bhxl3xrm8yp01fkkrl1rkk3w8b Xuanwo