Oh. You are right. My result is also the result of building 0.6.1-rc3.
Sincerely,
Suyan
Xuanwo 于2024年1月24日周三 12:06写道:
>
> Hi, Suyan
>
> > Convert my -1 vote to +1.
>
> RC2 is still failing. We should cancel this vote and initiate a new one for
> RC3 instead.
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, at
Hi Suyan,
It's similar to the previous one. I can't reproduce either of two in M1 and
jdk8.
So, do you mind that try to build the previous source code:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/paimon/paimon-0.6.0-incubating-rc1/
On 2024/01/23 08:30:05 Suyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With
Thanks Xuanwo for your validation!
And Suyan, the website has a Download page now [1]. (You may need to
clean your cache of images and files for your browser).
[1] https://paimon.apache.org/
Best,
Jingsong
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 9:07 PM Xuanwo wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for the effort. I have
Hi,
I've found out the reason, my local JAVA_HOME is unset by jenv.
I've fixed it and compiled it successfully.
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary for Paimon : 0.6.1-incubating:
[INFO]
[INFO] Paimon :
Hi,
I see it. It's great.
Thank you for your quick response.
Sincerely,
Suyan
Jingsong Li 于2024年1月24日周三 10:30写道:
>
> Thanks Xuanwo for your validation!
>
> And Suyan, the website has a Download page now [1]. (You may need to
> clean your cache of images and files for your browser).
>
> [1]
Hi, Suyan
> Convert my -1 vote to +1.
RC2 is still failing. We should cancel this vote and initiate a new one for RC3
instead.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, at 11:47, Suyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found out the reason, my local JAVA_HOME is unset by jenv.
> I've fixed it and compiled it successfully.
>
I re-checked the rc2. It builds successfully on my machine.
To me, +1 is reasonable now.
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary for Paimon : 0.6.1-incubating:
[INFO]
[INFO] Paimon : ... SUCCESS
Hello Incubator Community,
Cancel this vote on Apache Paimon (incubating) version 0.6.1-RC2, because
the source tar has some invalid files or directories which will lead a
failed build.
See details in the vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/m1pkm8bvc779gfwnl140gzsgtpfjwv6s
Hi Suyan and Xuanwo,
I will cancel this vote and cut a RC3. Thank you both again for checking and
responding.
--
谢谢 ~
Best Wishes ~
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi,
With this source, I meet a new issue.
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 3.268 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2024-01-23T16:28:50+08:00
Hi everyone,
The vote passes with 5 + 1s with 3 bindings and no negative votes.
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/sf9zy6bvn588wxb2hq06r60lxrohsb3j
Votes:
Xuanwo (non-binding)
PJ Fanning (binding)
Suyan (non-binding)
Yu Li (binding)
Kent Yao (binding)
I will proceed with the
Hi Alex,
While reproducible builds are a great idea, the Incubator PMC does not
require them. Plugging away at improving things so that reproducible
builds can be produced in future is a useful thing to do.
Regards,
PJ
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 14:58, Alex Porcelli wrote:
>
> In the KIE podling,
In the KIE podling, we regularly publish container images as part of
our releases. We've achieved semantically identical images, verified
using the 'diffoci' tool. However, due to current Docker/OCI engine
limitations, we can't eliminate variations in file metadata caused by
automatically appended
On 1/23/24 15:49, PJ Fanning wrote:
Hi Alex,
While reproducible builds are a great idea, the Incubator PMC does not
require them. Plugging away at improving things so that reproducible
builds can be produced in future is a useful thing to do.
This may be related to
HI Alex,
I would like to go even further: Having any form of reproducibility actually
isn’t a required attribute of any Apache releases (TLP or Podling).
I do think that in the future there will be more strict requirements, however
currently we don’t have any such rules.
Chris
Von: PJ
Daniel,
That’s exactly the reason. There’s also this link referencing the
requirement [1].
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=287607354#content/view/287607354
Regards,
_
Alex Porcelli
http://porcelli.me
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 9:58 AM Daniel
Thanks a lot for the effort. I have confirmed that rc3 build passed on
archlinux
x86_64 with Java 8.
[INFO] Reactor Summary for Paimon : 0.6.1-incubating:
[INFO]
[INFO] Paimon : ... SUCCESS [ 1.449 s]
[INFO] Paimon : Test utils
-1 (binding)
- Checked the diff between 0.3.2 and 0.4.0-rc4: FAILED (
https://github.com/apache/incubator-celeborn/compare/v0.3.2-incubating...v0.4.0-incubating-rc4).
Problems observed include:
* The client-flink/flink-1.15-shaded module bundles
*com.google.guava:failureaccess* but has no
Cancel this vote because of the license issue. See details in the vote
thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/sto05pgd213ymr6z1csvmkhbg2dcrwls
Thanks to all who participated in the vote, I’m going to fix the issue and
prepare the next RC ASAP.
Thanks,
Fu Chen
19 matches
Mail list logo