Re: Field of use constraint on OSOA license?

2007-09-30 Thread Mike Edwards
Folks, At present, I believe that the OSOA SCA specifications do not contain any actual conformance statements that would allow anyone to judge whether an implementation is compliant or not. As a result, this restriction is somewhat moot. As a result, I don't consider this restriction of

Re: Jakarta [was: Effects on corporate backing withdrawals [was: Incubator Proposal: Pig]]

2007-09-30 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Sunday 30 September 2007 01:19, Roland Weber wrote: The new HttpComponents as well as the old HttpClient we maintain are being used by Apache projects, so coming into the Incubator is not an option for HttpComponents. I agree. And typically, TLPs receive somewhat more exposure than

Re: Field of use constraint on OSOA license?

2007-09-30 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Sunday 30 September 2007 01:53, Jeremy Boynes wrote: The recent Tuscany distribution contains XSDs licensed under the OSOA license[1] which contains the following: Permission to copy, make derivative works of, and distribute the Service Component Architecture JavaDoc, Interface Definition

[VOTE] Accept project Imperius into the Incubator

2007-09-30 Thread Bill Stoddard
Greetings from North Carolina on a bright, beautiful, sunny fall day! Thank You to all those who gave comments on the proposal. I made one small tweak; Tomcat, rather than Geronimo, should be one of the first bindings. Please vote on accepting project Imperius into the Apache Incubator. The

Re: [VOTE] Accept project Imperius into the Incubator

2007-09-30 Thread Yoav Shapira
Yo, On 9/30/07, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote on accepting project Imperius into the Apache Incubator. The vote will run 1 week, until Sunday, Oct. 7, 2007 or until all Incubator PMC members have voted. [ X ] +1 Accept Imperius project for incubation Yoav

Re: Jakarta [was: Effects on corporate backing withdrawals [was: Incubator Proposal: Pig]]

2007-09-30 Thread Roland Weber
Niclas Hedhman wrote: I don't know what to suggest, but perhaps recruiting one or more veteran ASFer, either just off the member's list or some experienced Incubator mentor, feeling this being important could just join the PMC and at least ensure process with 3 pairs of eye balls. Yeah,

Re: [VOTE] Accept project Imperius into the Incubator

2007-09-30 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Sunday 30 September 2007 22:06, Bill Stoddard wrote: Please vote on accepting project Imperius into the Apache Incubator. The vote will run 1 week, until Sunday, Oct. 7, 2007 or until all Incubator PMC members have voted. [x] +1 Accept Imperius project for incubation Cheers -- Niclas

Re: [VOTE] Accept project Imperius into the Incubator

2007-09-30 Thread Craig L Russell
+1 Craig On Sep 30, 2007, at 7:06 AM, Bill Stoddard wrote: Greetings from North Carolina on a bright, beautiful, sunny fall day! Thank You to all those who gave comments on the proposal. I made one small tweak; Tomcat, rather than Geronimo, should be one of the first bindings. Please

Re: [VOTE] Accept project Imperius into the Incubator

2007-09-30 Thread Matthieu Riou
On 9/30/07, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote on accepting project Imperius into the Apache Incubator. The vote will run 1 week, until Sunday, Oct. 7, 2007 or until all Incubator PMC members have voted. [X] +1 Accept Imperius project for incubation Matthieu

Re: [VOTE] Accept project Imperius into the Incubator

2007-09-30 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 9/30/07, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...Nominated Mentors -Bill Stoddard([EMAIL PROTECTED])... Are we willing to accept a podling with just one mentor? Although [1] doesn't set a minimum number, we usually (always?) have more than one. (sorry, missed that in the discussion

Re: [VOTE] Accept project Imperius into the Incubator

2007-09-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On 9/30/07, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...Nominated Mentors -Bill Stoddard([EMAIL PROTECTED])... Are we willing to accept a podling with just one mentor? Although [1] doesn't set a minimum number, we usually (always?) have more than one. The