Re: [Discuss] Apache Cassandra as a TLP

2010-01-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote: ...By the way if you have a few minutes, some feedback about the resolution that Eric attached would be cool... The resolution looks good to me, but the proposed PMC is really small: * Jonathan Ellis

Re: [Discuss] Apache Cassandra as a TLP

2010-01-19 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote: ...By the way if you have a few minutes, some feedback about the resolution that Eric attached would be cool... The resolution

Re: Handling of Traffic Server Trademark

2010-01-19 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:50, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: Leif Hedstrom wrote: Traffic Server would like to resolve the TradeMark issues. Who would be able to make this call? snip/ Does anyone else have an opinion?  Please do offer it.  :-) There's a third option: Rename the

Re: [Discuss] Apache Cassandra as a TLP

2010-01-19 Thread ant elder
I echo Matthieu's comments about Cassandra being ready to graduate, I'll vote +1 for it in a vote. Not sure if that PMC list is actually the complete list as I thought there was talk of adding others, i'll ask about it on their private list. ...ant On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Matthias

Re: Missing reports due NOW

2010-01-19 Thread Martijn Dashorst
The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation with no moderator for the dev@ list. Martijn On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know we (empire-db) also did not receive a notification. Cheers, Francis On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at

RE: Missing reports due NOW

2010-01-19 Thread Gav...
-Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 7:24 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Missing reports due NOW The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation with no moderator for the dev@ list.

Re: Missing reports due NOW

2010-01-19 Thread Martijn Dashorst
AFAIK those were added after 1 januari (6 januari iirc), which is when the notice was sent out. Martijn On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: -Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010

Re: Missing reports due NOW

2010-01-19 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/19/2010 10:57 AM, Gav... wrote: -Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 7:24 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Missing reports due NOW The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation

Re: [VOTE] Accept OODT for Incubation

2010-01-19 Thread Ross Gardler
On 18/01/2010 20:17, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator. [X] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator Ross - To

Fwd: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)

2010-01-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Forwarding to Incubator PMC, your votes are welcome (and sorry about re-voting...we at ESME changed our minds slightly) -- Forwarded message -- From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM Subject: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47) To:

Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)

2010-01-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
(ccing both lists now..) On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. +1 on what's suggested below (IPMC binding) -Bertrand 1. The Apache license block will be added at

Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)

2010-01-19 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me -- dims On 01/19/2010 06:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Forwarding to Incubator PMC, your votes are welcome (and sorry about re-voting...we at ESME changed our minds slightly) -- Forwarded message -- From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com Date: Tue,

Re: Missing reports due NOW

2010-01-19 Thread Francis De Brabandere
can I as a new mod see what messages are still in the mod queue? On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:02 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/19/2010 10:57 AM, Gav... wrote: -Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 19

Re: Missing reports due NOW

2010-01-19 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: can I as a new mod see what messages are still in the mod queue? I don't know the command and if it is possible. I do know that the marvin messages have expired already (they do so after a week iirc). You can

Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)

2010-01-19 Thread Anne Kathrine Petterøe
Not my day for multi-tasking apparently, sorry... Apache ESME of course. +1 On 19 Jan, 2010, at 12:25 , Richard Hirsch wrote: The NOTICE should say Apache ESME instead of Apache Foo +1 On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: (ccing both

Re: [VOTE] Accept OODT for Incubation

2010-01-19 Thread Luciano Resende
[X] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [Discuss] Apache Cassandra as a TLP

2010-01-19 Thread Matthieu Riou
The relative smallness of the PMC is more a result of Cassandra's history I think. They've started really small (basically one active committer) and added committers gradually. Those committers have been elected in the PPMC usually one to two months after their election, you can check the

Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)

2010-01-19 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Let's get this finalized and move on. Dan On Tue January 19 2010 6:17:16 am Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: (ccing both lists now..) On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright

Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)

2010-01-19 Thread Anne Kathrine Petterøe
Robert, We have already had a lengthy discussion on legal-discuss: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201001.mbox/thread Look for the Committer refuses to remove copyright notices in source (ESME-47),how best to solve? thread. I am not sure if this is the same

Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)

2010-01-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Daniel Kulp wrote: +1 Let's get this finalized and move on. Dan On Tue January 19 2010 6:17:16 am Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: (ccing both lists now..) On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following

Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)

2010-01-19 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jan 19, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. snip 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy

Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)

2010-01-19 Thread Craig L Russell
+1 Craig On Jan 19, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: This issue was discussed extensively on legal-discuss, this proposal matches my understanding of the consensus opinion reached there. Here's my +1 (IPMC binding) --kevan On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:

[VOTE] release cassandra 0.5.0 (final)

2010-01-19 Thread Eric Evans
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache Cassandra 0.5.0. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, structured key-value store. Podling vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Accept OODT for Incubation

2010-01-19 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 18, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator. [ ] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator [ ] -1 - Do not accept OODT into the Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)

2010-01-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: ...I suggest you review the thread that was provided and then see if you want to reconsider your veto As this vote is not about a technical issue, I don't think there are vetos - we should have explicitely