Re: [Discuss] Apache Cassandra as a TLP
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote: ...By the way if you have a few minutes, some feedback about the resolution that Eric attached would be cool... The resolution looks good to me, but the proposed PMC is really small: * Jonathan Ellisjbel...@apache.org * Eric Evanseev...@apache.org * Jun Rao jun...@apache.org * Chris Goffinetgoffi...@apache.org And all of its members are currently active in Cassandra only. Would it be possible for (some of) the mentors to stay onboard for a while? With only 4 PMC members to start with, the risk of being unable to get 3 votes on issues is real. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [Discuss] Apache Cassandra as a TLP
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote: ...By the way if you have a few minutes, some feedback about the resolution that Eric attached would be cool... The resolution looks good to me, but the proposed PMC is really small: * Jonathan Ellis jbel...@apache.org * Eric Evans eev...@apache.org * Jun Rao jun...@apache.org * Chris Goffinet goffi...@apache.org And all of its members are currently active in Cassandra only. Would it be possible for (some of) the mentors to stay onboard for a while? With only 4 PMC members to start with, the risk of being unable to get 3 votes on issues is real. that's a good point, Bertrand. Those that are involved in other communities are the mentors, like Torsten, Matthieu or Brian (according to [1]). Looks like the only exception is Johan Oskarsson, but I am not to familiar with the community itself and its activity. However I noted that Johan voted for the graduation... I am also not sure why the proposed PMC is that small. Some try to expand their PPMC during incubation with all the active folks (mailings and commits). So, I am not sure on the reason why there is this small (P)PMC. -Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Handling of Traffic Server Trademark
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:50, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: Leif Hedstrom wrote: Traffic Server would like to resolve the TradeMark issues. Who would be able to make this call? snip/ Does anyone else have an opinion? Please do offer it. :-) There's a third option: Rename the project. Has this been discussed already? Bernd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [Discuss] Apache Cassandra as a TLP
I echo Matthieu's comments about Cassandra being ready to graduate, I'll vote +1 for it in a vote. Not sure if that PMC list is actually the complete list as I thought there was talk of adding others, i'll ask about it on their private list. ...ant On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote: ...By the way if you have a few minutes, some feedback about the resolution that Eric attached would be cool... The resolution looks good to me, but the proposed PMC is really small: * Jonathan Ellis jbel...@apache.org * Eric Evans eev...@apache.org * Jun Rao jun...@apache.org * Chris Goffinet goffi...@apache.org And all of its members are currently active in Cassandra only. Would it be possible for (some of) the mentors to stay onboard for a while? With only 4 PMC members to start with, the risk of being unable to get 3 votes on issues is real. that's a good point, Bertrand. Those that are involved in other communities are the mentors, like Torsten, Matthieu or Brian (according to [1]). Looks like the only exception is Johan Oskarsson, but I am not to familiar with the community itself and its activity. However I noted that Johan voted for the graduation... I am also not sure why the proposed PMC is that small. Some try to expand their PPMC during incubation with all the active folks (mailings and commits). So, I am not sure on the reason why there is this small (P)PMC. -Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Missing reports due NOW
The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation with no moderator for the dev@ list. Martijn On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know we (empire-db) also did not receive a notification. Cheers, Francis On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Jan 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: Missing: Subversion Hmm. Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball got dropped, I guess. Subversion should have something submitted by this evening. -- justin The automated notifier (Marvin?) sent it's notification on Jan. 1, and it was promptly missed in all the post-holiday revelry. -Hyrum - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: Missing reports due NOW
-Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 7:24 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Missing reports due NOW The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation with no moderator for the dev@ list. Or no 'active' moderators, these are listed as mods for the dev list. francisdb doebele reiher Gav... Martijn On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know we (empire-db) also did not receive a notification. Cheers, Francis On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Jan 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: Missing: Subversion Hmm. Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball got dropped, I guess. Subversion should have something submitted by this evening. -- justin The automated notifier (Marvin?) sent it's notification on Jan. 1, and it was promptly missed in all the post-holiday revelry. -Hyrum - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Missing reports due NOW
AFAIK those were added after 1 januari (6 januari iirc), which is when the notice was sent out. Martijn On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: -Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 7:24 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Missing reports due NOW The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation with no moderator for the dev@ list. Or no 'active' moderators, these are listed as mods for the dev list. francisdb doebele reiher Gav... Martijn On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know we (empire-db) also did not receive a notification. Cheers, Francis On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Jan 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: Missing: Subversion Hmm. Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball got dropped, I guess. Subversion should have something submitted by this evening. -- justin The automated notifier (Marvin?) sent it's notification on Jan. 1, and it was promptly missed in all the post-holiday revelry. -Hyrum - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Missing reports due NOW
On 01/19/2010 10:57 AM, Gav... wrote: -Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 7:24 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Missing reports due NOW The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation with no moderator for the dev@ list. Or no 'active' moderators, these are listed as mods for the dev list. francisdb doebele reiher Add me. Cheers Jean-Frederic Gav... Martijn On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know we (empire-db) also did not receive a notification. Cheers, Francis On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Jan 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: Missing: Subversion Hmm. Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball got dropped, I guess. Subversion should have something submitted by this evening. -- justin The automated notifier (Marvin?) sent it's notification on Jan. 1, and it was promptly missed in all the post-holiday revelry. -Hyrum - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept OODT for Incubation
On 18/01/2010 20:17, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator. [X] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator Ross - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Fwd: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
Forwarding to Incubator PMC, your votes are welcome (and sorry about re-voting...we at ESME changed our minds slightly) -- Forwarded message -- From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM Subject: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47) To: esme-...@incubator.apache.org PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. 1. The Apache license block will be added at the beginning of each source file: /* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 * (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy comment (Only in files where the WorldWide Conferencing notice currently exists, except any files where user dpp has not made any contribution): /* * Portions Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC */ 3. A NOTICE file with the following text will be added: Apache Foo Incubating Code Copyright 2010 The Apache Software Foundation. This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). For details, please see this legal-discuss mailing list thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201001.mbox/%3cf767f0601001110028n54d85d03xaf703119fa08d...@mail.gmail.com%3e - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
(ccing both lists now..) On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. +1 on what's suggested below (IPMC binding) -Bertrand 1. The Apache license block will be added at the beginning of each source file: /* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 * (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy comment (Only in files where the WorldWide Conferencing notice currently exists, except any files where user dpp has not made any contribution): /* * Portions Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC */ 3. A NOTICE file with the following text will be added: Apache Foo Incubating Code Copyright 2010 The Apache Software Foundation. This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). For details, please see this legal-discuss mailing list thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201001.mbox/%3cf767f0601001110028n54d85d03xaf703119fa08d...@mail.gmail.com%3e - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
+1 from me -- dims On 01/19/2010 06:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Forwarding to Incubator PMC, your votes are welcome (and sorry about re-voting...we at ESME changed our minds slightly) -- Forwarded message -- From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM Subject: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47) To: esme-...@incubator.apache.org PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. 1. The Apache license block will be added at the beginning of each source file: /* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 * (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy comment (Only in files where the WorldWide Conferencing notice currently exists, except any files where user dpp has not made any contribution): /* * Portions Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC */ 3. A NOTICE file with the following text will be added: Apache Foo Incubating Code Copyright 2010 The Apache Software Foundation. This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). For details, please see this legal-discuss mailing list thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201001.mbox/%3cf767f0601001110028n54d85d03xaf703119fa08d...@mail.gmail.com%3e - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Missing reports due NOW
can I as a new mod see what messages are still in the mod queue? On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:02 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/19/2010 10:57 AM, Gav... wrote: -Original Message- From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 7:24 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Missing reports due NOW The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation with no moderator for the dev@ list. Or no 'active' moderators, these are listed as mods for the dev list. francisdb doebele reiher Add me. Cheers Jean-Frederic Gav... Martijn On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I know we (empire-db) also did not receive a notification. Cheers, Francis On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Jan 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: Missing: Subversion Hmm. Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball got dropped, I guess. Subversion should have something submitted by this evening. -- justin The automated notifier (Marvin?) sent it's notification on Jan. 1, and it was promptly missed in all the post-holiday revelry. -Hyrum - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Missing reports due NOW
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: can I as a new mod see what messages are still in the mod queue? I don't know the command and if it is possible. I do know that the marvin messages have expired already (they do so after a week iirc). You can read more about ezml here [1]. Page 40 and on contain stuff about moderation. Martijn [1] http://support.kavi.com/documentation/manuals/kmanuals/kmlm_3-1_manual.pdf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
Not my day for multi-tasking apparently, sorry... Apache ESME of course. +1 On 19 Jan, 2010, at 12:25 , Richard Hirsch wrote: The NOTICE should say Apache ESME instead of Apache Foo +1 On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: (ccing both lists now..) On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. +1 on what's suggested below (IPMC binding) -Bertrand 1. The Apache license block will be added at the beginning of each source file: /* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 * (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy comment (Only in files where the WorldWide Conferencing notice currently exists, except any files where user dpp has not made any contribution): /* * Portions Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC */ 3. A NOTICE file with the following text will be added: Apache Foo Incubating Code Copyright 2010 The Apache Software Foundation. This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). For details, please see this legal-discuss mailing list thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201001.mbox/%3cf767f0601001110028n54d85d03xaf703119fa08d...@mail.gmail.com%3e - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept OODT for Incubation
[X] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [Discuss] Apache Cassandra as a TLP
The relative smallness of the PMC is more a result of Cassandra's history I think. They've started really small (basically one active committer) and added committers gradually. Those committers have been elected in the PPMC usually one to two months after their election, you can check the archives. The pace has been accelerating lately so a few committers are in the pipeline for PMC. I wouldn't read any more than that in the PMC size. For the record, my first PPMC (ODE) was elected with more names but the same amount of active ones. And that was a bit painful, a tight PMC will help them get a quicker vote turnaround. That being said, I've already mentioned on Cassandra's mailing lists that I'd be sticking around a little longer as a member. If you see that it would facilitate things, I'd be happy to do it as a PMC member as well. Thanks, Matthieu On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:00 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: I echo Matthieu's comments about Cassandra being ready to graduate, I'll vote +1 for it in a vote. Not sure if that PMC list is actually the complete list as I thought there was talk of adding others, i'll ask about it on their private list. ...ant On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote: ...By the way if you have a few minutes, some feedback about the resolution that Eric attached would be cool... The resolution looks good to me, but the proposed PMC is really small: * Jonathan Ellisjbel...@apache.org * Eric Evanseev...@apache.org * Jun Rao jun...@apache.org * Chris Goffinetgoffi...@apache.org And all of its members are currently active in Cassandra only. Would it be possible for (some of) the mentors to stay onboard for a while? With only 4 PMC members to start with, the risk of being unable to get 3 votes on issues is real. that's a good point, Bertrand. Those that are involved in other communities are the mentors, like Torsten, Matthieu or Brian (according to [1]). Looks like the only exception is Johan Oskarsson, but I am not to familiar with the community itself and its activity. However I noted that Johan voted for the graduation... I am also not sure why the proposed PMC is that small. Some try to expand their PPMC during incubation with all the active folks (mailings and commits). So, I am not sure on the reason why there is this small (P)PMC. -Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.htmlhttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejim/committers.html -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
+1 Let's get this finalized and move on. Dan On Tue January 19 2010 6:17:16 am Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: (ccing both lists now..) On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. +1 on what's suggested below (IPMC binding) -Bertrand 1. The Apache license block will be added at the beginning of each source file: /* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 * (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy comment (Only in files where the WorldWide Conferencing notice currently exists, except any files where user dpp has not made any contribution): /* * Portions Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC */ 3. A NOTICE file with the following text will be added: Apache Foo Incubating Code Copyright 2010 The Apache Software Foundation. This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). For details, please see this legal-discuss mailing list thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201001.mbox/%3 cf767f0601001110028n54d85d03xaf703119fa08d...@mail.gmail.com%3e - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
Robert, We have already had a lengthy discussion on legal-discuss: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201001.mbox/thread Look for the Committer refuses to remove copyright notices in source (ESME-47),how best to solve? thread. I am not sure if this is the same list as the legal-private list you mention? The text in this vote is a suggestion from William Rowe: http://markmail.org/message/q6yweleer2voqvd3 (which no one on the legal-list objected to) /Anne On 19 Jan, 2010, at 17:51 , Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. snip 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy comment (Only in files where the WorldWide Conferencing notice currently exists, except any files where user dpp has not made any contribution): /* * Portions Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC */ ipmc-hatlegal-hatianal if this language has not been cleared with our lawyers on legal-private then : * i'm -1 on this phrasing * please raise a legal JIRA for appropriate language /ianal/legal-hat/ipmc-hat the reason for this veto is that i believe that this phrasing is 1. potentially untrue for example, if at some future time someone decides to revert all the relevant commits - or in time the code is so extensively revised then no portions of the code will be subject to that copyright and the statement will be untrue. 2. potentially dangerous for example it could be read as a claim rather than a statement AIUI (please jump in if i'm wrong) some source files was derived from originals that contained the notice Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC. something along the lines below seems to me more truthful: /* * This document was derived from an original containing the following copyright notice: * * Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC * */ but IMO this is a job for a lawyer - robert
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
+1 Daniel Kulp wrote: +1 Let's get this finalized and move on. Dan On Tue January 19 2010 6:17:16 am Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: (ccing both lists now..) On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. +1 on what's suggested below (IPMC binding) -Bertrand 1. The Apache license block will be added at the beginning of each source file: /* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 * (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy comment (Only in files where the WorldWide Conferencing notice currently exists, except any files where user dpp has not made any contribution): /* * Portions Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC */ 3. A NOTICE file with the following text will be added: Apache Foo Incubating Code Copyright 2010 The Apache Software Foundation. This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). For details, please see this legal-discuss mailing list thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201001.mbox/%3 cf767f0601001110028n54d85d03xaf703119fa08d...@mail.gmail.com%3e - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax) BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net j...@nanthrax.net PGP : 17D4F086 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
On Jan 19, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. snip 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy comment (Only in files where the WorldWide Conferencing notice currently exists, except any files where user dpp has not made any contribution): /* * Portions Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC */ ipmc-hatlegal-hatianal if this language has not been cleared with our lawyers on legal-private then : * i'm -1 on this phrasing * please raise a legal JIRA for appropriate language As others have said, this has been discussed at length on legal-discuss. The lawyers have expressed their opinion (that it mostly doesn't matter). I think requesting a Jira issue for this is a bad idea because a) it is highly unlikely that the result will be different and b) legal Jira issues aren't noted for being resolved quickly and c) Jira issues are resolved by lawyers. I suggest you review the thread that was provided and then see if you want to reconsider your veto. Ralph - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
+1 Craig On Jan 19, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: This issue was discussed extensively on legal-discuss, this proposal matches my understanding of the consensus opinion reached there. Here's my +1 (IPMC binding) --kevan On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: (ccing both lists now..) On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe yoji...@gmail.com wrote: PPMC and IPMC, please re-vote on the following regarding copyright issue ESME-47. +1 on what's suggested below (IPMC binding) -Bertrand 1. The Apache license block will be added at the beginning of each source file: /* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 * (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ 2. The Apache License block will be followed by a legacy comment (Only in files where the WorldWide Conferencing notice currently exists, except any files where user dpp has not made any contribution): /* * Portions Copyright 2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC */ 3. A NOTICE file with the following text will be added: Apache Foo Incubating Code Copyright 2010 The Apache Software Foundation. This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). For details, please see this legal-discuss mailing list thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201001.mbox/%3cf767f0601001110028n54d85d03xaf703119fa08d...@mail.gmail.com%3e - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@sun.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] release cassandra 0.5.0 (final)
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache Cassandra 0.5.0. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, structured key-value store. Podling vote thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.cassandra.devel/811 0.5.0 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.5.0 Project home: http://incubator.apache.org/cassandra/ Incubation status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cassandra.html We received three (IPMC )binding votes[1][2][3] during the poddling vote, but help with artifact review is always welcome. The vote will remain open for 72 hours. Regards, [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.cassandra.devel/814 [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.cassandra.devel/820 [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.cassandra.devel/825 -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept OODT for Incubation
+1 Regards, Alan On Jan 18, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator. [ ] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator [ ] -1 - Do not accept OODT into the Incubator (rationale strongly desired!) Per the proposal below, the mentors for this proposal are myself, Ross, Jean-Frederic, and Ian. Unless there are any extenuating circumstances, I will close this vote on Thursday morning, January 21. Thanks. -- justin http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OODTProposal OODT, a grid middleware framework for science data processing, information integration, and retrieval. Abstract OODT is a grid middleware framework used on a number of successful projects at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, and many other research institutions and universities, specifically those part of the: National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) project - over 40+ institutions all performing research into discovering biomarkers which are early indicators of disease. NASA's Planetary Data System (PDS) - NASA's planetary data archive, a repository and registry for all planetary data collected over the past 30+ years. various Earth Science data processing missions, including Seawinds/QuickSCAT, the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, the NPP Sounder PEATE project, and the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission. From the OODT website: It's middleware for metadata: Transparent access to distributed resources Data discovery and query optimization Distributed processing and virtual archives It's a software architecture: Models for information representation Solutions to knowledge capture problems Unification of technology, data, and metadata Proposal OODT is an established open source project, with 9+ years of existence, and deployment at universities, federal research institutions, other NASA centers, and the NIH (it won runner-up NASA software of the year in 2003). It has a strong community of those that operate and support its growth. Our proposal is to bring OODT into Apache to strengthen its support and its capabilities even further on the laurels of Apache's brand and its growing huge community of developers from all over the world. In short, bringing OODT into Apache will significantly enhance OODT's widespread use, will likely improve its codebase, and furthermore will help Apache philosophy and community spread into OODT's already large community-base reaching across government, academia and industry. OODT will be, to the best of our knowledge, the first grid community project to bear the Apache brand. By grid technology, we mean a technology that provides the ability to create virtual organizations, as originally described by Kesselman and Foster in their seminal paper on grid computing. OODT provides both computational and data grid support, and is built with a component-philosophy. OODT includes components that allow for virtual information integration across organizations (provided by the Profile, Product and Query server components), and that allow for distributed data management and processing across heterogeneous virtual organizations (provided by the Catalog and Archive Service set of components, including File Manager, Workflow Manager and Resource Manager). Each set of components exist as independently organized Maven2 projects, that reference each other (where appropriate), forming a layered set of components and a framework for grid computing. Background OODT is an established project within JPL and in use at several NASA centers, as well as univerities, and other government organizations and industrial collaborations. Chris Mattmann, a JPL employee, and ASF PMC (Lucene) and Committer (Nutch, Tika), has been working for the past 2 years on obtaining the necessary permission from JPL to release OODT into Apache. After initially being stalled, JPL has granted permission to allow OODT into Apache. Through his academic relationship with Justin Erekrantz, Apache President, and through their collective Ph.D. studies, OODT has been discussed between Chris and Justin on several occasions, and Justin offered to help champion OODT into the Apache Incubator when JPL was ready to release OODT. In December 2009, that permission was granted. This proposal is the result of the above efforts and related discussions. Some alternatives to incubation, like Apache Labs came up during the discussions but we believe that taking the project to the Incubator is the best way to start growing a viable Apache-based community to sustain OODT. Furthermore, given its larger code base and existing sub-projects, the goal would be for OODT to leverage the incubator to graduate into Apache's first top-level grid project, rather than graduate into a sub-project of an existing TLP. Rationale Grid computing has been around for the past 10 years and
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: ...I suggest you review the thread that was provided and then see if you want to reconsider your veto As this vote is not about a technical issue, I don't think there are vetos - we should have explicitely specified that this is a majority vote. Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just express your disagreement with the majority? -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
