On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial
> Information Systems (SIS). I think we have all the
> necessary bits in place for the proposal to go forward. note. Both Patrick&
> Chris are comitters in the lucene/hado
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:
> I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial
> Information Systems (SIS).
> Proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SpatialProposal
[x] +1. Accept SIS into the Incubator.
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
h
Thanks Ian !
completely biased ;-)
[x] +1. Accept SIS into the Incubator.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
> Given the lack of response on the proposal, I'll assume lazy consensus and
> call a vote.
>
> I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial
>
Hi Ian,
Thanks!
> I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial
> Information Systems (SIS). I think we have all the
> necessary bits in place for the proposal to go forward. note. Both Patrick&
> Chris are comitters in the lucene/hadoop projects.
To clarify:
Patrick is a
Given the lack of response on the proposal, I'll assume lazy consensus and call
a vote.
I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial
Information Systems (SIS). I think we have all the
necessary bits in place for the proposal to go forward. note. Both Patrick&
Chris are
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> The svn devs also had a quick discussion for the VP recommendation to
> the Board, starting with my self-nomination. There were a couple other
> people that may be interested in future years, but there was general
> support for my initial role.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Bertrand Delacretaz
>> ...Unfortunately I'm -1 on the release, I have a few issues including a
>> GPL dependency.
>>
>> 1) jwebunit dependency is GPL
>> The server module depends on
>>
>> net.sourceforge
Like I said - I'm seeing this first release as a learning experience (grin,
grin)
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Richard Hirsch
> wrote:
> > ...The candidate can be found at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme
Thanks for voting, everybody! There was a slew of +1 votes, and no -1 votes.
The svn devs also had a quick discussion for the VP recommendation to
the Board, starting with my self-nomination. There were a couple other
people that may be interested in future years, but there was general
support for
Lee Fisher wrote:
> What would be the focus (if any)?
Two areas of emphasis that I'd think useful:
1) NDK-based: or APR, httpd, and other appropriate *-c projects, for
unblocked devices and other Android-based platforms.
Ensure BIONC C comapatility, address Binder/AIDL/JNI lib issues, so
ea
Scott Wilson wrote:
[snip]
I completely agree - what I think would be useful would be a W3C
Widgets[1] & W3C DAP[2] implementation for Android to enable
cross-platform standards-based mobile app development (as suggested by
Peter-Paul Koch [3]). Apache Wookie(Incubating)[4] already implements
- Original Message
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz
> To: esme-...@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 11:28:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Richard
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> ...The candidate can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/
Unfortunately I'm -1 on the release, I have a few issues including a
GPL dependency.
1) jwebunit dependency is GPL
The server module depends on
net.sourcefo
Hi guys,
On 2/16/10 8:22 AM, "Daniel Kulp" wrote:
>> What would be better in the pom.xml:
>> apache-esme-1.0?
>
> No, just 1.0-incubator or similar. If this is the 1.0 release, the version
> number should be 1.0. The 1.1 release would have a version of 1.1.
According to:
http://incubator.
On Tue February 16 2010 10:18:10 am Richard Hirsch wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > 2) The tar unpacks into a "trunk" directory. That really should unpack
> > into
> > a "apache-esme-1.0" directory or similar.
>
> I'll change this for the next release.
>
> > 3)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Hirsch
Date: Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0
To: Daniel Kulp
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> +1 (mentor and IPMC binding)
>
> Some thoughts, but n
Thanks for volunteering in the first place...
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I seem to clearly recall that I sent a message a while ago stating
> that I didn't have quite enough time to follow River with the
> attention it deserves. It seems that one fell
Howdy,
I seem to clearly recall that I sent a message a while ago stating
that I didn't have quite enough time to follow River with the
attention it deserves. It seems that one fell through some cracks
(most likely sitting in one of my draft folders) and I was reminded
that indeed I am still liste
+1 (mentor and IPMC binding)
Some thoughts, but nothing that I would consider a "show stopper" since this
is a source only release (aka: not providing a prebuilt war type thing or
deploying it to Maven central):
1) The README mentions a "Collective work: Copyright 2007", but the NOTICE
start
On 15/Feb/2010 20:56, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Would there be interest in a project to develop Android-based apps?
>
> know that it sounds like an umbrella, and perhaps it would be until we
> developed some critical mass, but it would provide us with a place to
> collaborate.
For those people who
On 16 Feb 2010, at 10:05, Nick Kew wrote:
On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Christopher Brind wrote:
I dare say I would probably be interested in most anything you can
come up
with :) but I suspect the project would need to be something more
specific
as a starter for the incubator?
+1 to that.
On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Christopher Brind wrote:
> I dare say I would probably be interested in most anything you can come up
> with :) but I suspect the project would need to be something more specific
> as a starter for the incubator?
+1 to that.
What sets android apart from its peers to ma
I dare say I would probably be interested in most anything you can come up
with :) but I suspect the project would need to be something more specific
as a starter for the incubator?
Could throw out a few ideas maybe, see what people can come up with? Is
this mailing list the right place for that
23 matches
Mail list logo
