On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> If the name is going to change (which sounds like a good idea) I'd
> suggest going for something more abstract, to which you can give
> meaning: Apache Connecto, or some such.
+1. -- justin
-
IMO the main thing to be careful about is to not look at committership from
the traditional organizational structure approach. Committership is a means
to an end (modifying code) but we are also interested in getting that person
become actually be committed to the project and care about it and have
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 06:41 +1000, Gav... wrote:
> I think the title of the name change is a little misleading.
>
> We are not Replacing 'Lucene' with 'Apache' .
>
> Apache is a given.
>
> IOW - The proposal is either:
>
> Change "Apache Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Frame
I think the title of the name change is a little misleading.
We are not Replacing 'Lucene' with 'Apache' .
Apache is a given.
IOW - The proposal is either:
Change "Apache Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework"
or:
Change "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Connectors Fram
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Glen Daniels wrote:
> Gotta agree with David here. I'd prefer a less ambiguous name.
>
Something in the line of "Apache Content Connectors Framework" maybe?
Just my 0.02€
Regards
Paul
-
To uns
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> There are a few Incubator projects that have small communities. I see
> no problem with trying it. You could certainly get some better
> visibility here, in order to grow your community.
>
Being one participating in some of these projects with
There are a few Incubator projects that have small communities. I see
no problem with trying it. You could certainly get some better
visibility here, in order to grow your community.
Cheers,
-g
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:05, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> together with a friend I am ru
Gotta agree with David here. I'd prefer a less ambiguous name.
--Glen
"David Jencks" wrote:
>As I attempted to politely make clear earlier I find this name extremely
>confusing. Web connectors are just one subject area I assume this project
>covers.
>
>I think its generally a good idea if
As I attempted to politely make clear earlier I find this name extremely
confusing. Web connectors are just one subject area I assume this project
covers.
I think its generally a good idea if projects don't use their names to imply
they are the only apache implementation of a certain kind of
I'd like to formally propose a new project for the incubator, Apache
Isis. If accepted, Isis will combine the existing open source Naked
Objects framework with a collection of sister projects, providing an
extensible Java-based framework for rapidly developing domain-driven
applications.
I f
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:24:48 +0800:
>> I think that the committer list could very well remain without
>> trimming as it will be a decent record of past contributors, and that
>> the effort is put into "Who is going t
Oy. I started by posting a process question about where to go with the
results of the PPMC vote. I think that can't have been wrong on
@general. Then people started adding votes. That was wrong at
@general. So I opened a new thread for voting on @private
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Daniel Sha
Hi all,
together with a friend I am running a small project with a small community.
Its already dependent to Apache log4php. Since Zeta Components entered the
incubator we have the strong feeling that Zeta will help us one many
corners. In other terms, we want to make our project dependent to Zeta
Should have been s/general@/private@/?
Benson Margulies wrote on Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 17:16:24 -0400:
> We are short one IPMC vote for a new River committer. She's been an
> enthusiastic contributor.
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jukka Zitting
> Date: Mon, Aug 23, 2010 a
Niclas Hedhman wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:24:48 +0800:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> > Luciano,
> >
> > A River committer has indicated a lack of interest in remaining
> > involved. Emeritus status seems overkill in a podling, but that's just
> > my opinion.
Imo this also depends if someone has already contributed heavily to the project
or had almost no impact at all.
If he contributed lots of things and did a good work in the past, then I'd say
we should keep him on the list.
But if he haven't really contributed to the project I'd be +1 for removi
16 matches
Mail list logo
