+1
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi IPMC'ers and the rest of the Incubator community,
>
> The OODT community has been discussing graduation to TLP [1]. There is
> overwhelming consensus in the community (all +1 VOTEs including those from
> our mentors) that w
Thanks Joe!
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Done.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Patrick Hunt
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Sat, November 13, 2010 1:17:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: Please add me to the Incubator UNIX group
>>
>> Sorry, that is I'm tr
Done.
- Original Message
> From: Patrick Hunt
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, November 13, 2010 1:17:45 AM
> Subject: Re: Please add me to the Incubator UNIX group
>
> Sorry, that is I'm trying to finalize the Whirr release. Thanks.
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:16
Sorry, that is I'm trying to finalize the Whirr release. Thanks.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hello, a hand please?
>
> Can someone with the necessary karma please add me to the Incubator
> UNIX group so that I can finalize the release/site? I'm the release
> manager an
Hello, a hand please?
Can someone with the necessary karma please add me to the Incubator
UNIX group so that I can finalize the release/site? I'm the release
manager and commiter on the project.
Thanks,
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe
With 3 +1's (Tom White's binding vote was cast on the whirr-dev list)
and no -1's the vote
passes. I'm working to publish the release and will send announcements
as soon as that's
done.
Thanks everyone.
Patrick
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> +1 Checksums & sigs are corre
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
I think this comes down to saxon as the issue
is this helpful?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx4/bundles/tags/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.saxon-9.1.0.1_1/pom.xml?view=markup
It seems to me that the servicemix project, which I do not know, has its own
Maven r
I think this comes down to saxon as the issue
is this helpful?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx4/bundles/tags/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.saxon-9.1.0.1_1/pom.xml?view=markup
the other items (CyberNeko, XML Commons) may be work to find the right
links ...
Jeremy
Jeremy Carroll
Yes yes yes! :) +1 non-binding.
Paul
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 19:42 -0800, Cameron Goodale wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Cameron
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) <
> paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding) for making OODT a TLP.
> >
>
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
"The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html";
Also, this relates to the release process and publishing of artifacts
in the Maven Cent
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
The question about whether Apache would like to rethink our earlier
legal advice to require click through license agreement before executing
untrusted code in a sandbox should probably go to legal-discuss@ mailing
list, - at what point in the process should I initiate that
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
"The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html";
BrowserLauncher2 could be removed in favor of a much simpler approach
(i.e. write it in
+1 non-binding
Best Regards,
Cameron
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) <
paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> +1 (non binding) for making OODT a TLP.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:18 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
> > Hi IPMC'ers and the rest of the
On 11/12/2010 6:05 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
CyberNeko and TagSoup both have acceptable licenses. Some people
prefer TagSoup because it does not require Xerces.
Have you read http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
No I hadn't. That is very useful.
A first reaction, concerning the GRDDL
CyberNeko and TagSoup both have acceptable licenses. Some people
prefer TagSoup because it does not require Xerces.
Have you read http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 5:47 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> CyberNeko is
On 11/12/2010 5:47 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
CyberNeko is at least class B, since Tika uses it.
The actual requirement is for a parser that makes a reasonable job of
HTML in the wild, and implements SAX2
No particular reason for CyberNeko but it met those requirements, works,
and met our p
CyberNeko is at least class B, since Tika uses it.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>>
>> Also (from the JenaProposal):
>>
>> "The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
>> http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
"The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html";
BrowserLauncher2 could be removed in favor of a much simpler approach
(i.e. write it in a file!).
That is ac
+1 Checksums & sigs are correct. Licensing looks good.
Doug
On 11/10/2010 08:59 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Whirr, version
0.2.0-incubating.
PPMC release vote thread:
http://markmail.org/message/kdfnohhod6wdrqaz
The issues fixed for 0.2.0-incubatin
+1
On 12.11.2010 Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> +1...binding.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> On 11/12/10 9:01 AM, "Sander W G van der Waal"
> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Sander
>
> > From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
> > Sent: 10 November 2010 15:11
> > To: Incuba
Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 12/11/10 08:40, Nick Kew wrote:
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal
to accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text
of the proposal is copied here for your convenien
+1
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Sander W G van der Waal
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Sander
>
>> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@apache.org]
>> Sent: 08 November 2010 23:37
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator
>>
>> I am pleased to of
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache SIS 0.1-incubating.
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
+1.
Thanks,
Greg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-u
+1 (non binding) for making OODT a TLP.
Thanks,
Paul
On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:18 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi IPMC'ers and the rest of the Incubator community,
>
> The OODT community has been discussing graduation to TLP [1]. There is
> overwhelming consensus in the community (all +1 V
And also great work Chris !
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:16 AM, patrick o'leary wrote:
> Still looks good to me, but thanks for spotting the licensing stuff
>
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) <
> paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>> +1,
>>
>> --Paul Ramirez
>
Still looks good to me, but thanks for spotting the licensing stuff
+1
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) <
paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> +1,
>
> --Paul Ramirez
>
> On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I have posted a
+1,
--Paul Ramirez
On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have posted a 3rd candidate for the Apache SIS 0.1-incubating release. The
> source code is at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-sis-0.1-incubating/rc3/
>
> This release addresses th
+1...binding.
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/12/10 9:01 AM, "Sander W G van der Waal"
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Sander
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
> Sent: 10 November 2010 15:11
> To: Incubator General
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept Stanbol for incubation
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we
+1 (non-binding)
Sander
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
> Sent: 10 November 2010 15:11
> To: Incubator General
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept Stanbol for incubation
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we're ready to vote on the
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StanbolProposal now, copy
+1 (non-binding)
Sander
> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@apache.org]
> Sent: 08 November 2010 23:37
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator
>
> I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
> accept Jena, a semantic
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:20 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
> someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
> votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
> for votes from Incubator PMC memb
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Glen Daniels wrote:
> ...I also agree with Bertrand's point about notifying private@, and would be
> OK
> with requiring a (single) mentor/IPMC vote to ensure that someone is paying
> attention... but it would be nice if we didn't need two
Ok, one mentor is e
+1 from me.
I also agree with Bertrand's point about notifying private@, and would be OK
with requiring a (single) mentor/IPMC vote to ensure that someone is paying
attention... but it would be nice if we didn't need two.
--Glen
On 11/12/2010 3:20 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I'd like to propose that
+1 from me...
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/12/10 12:20 AM, "ant elder" wrote:
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from Incu
+1. Source, sigs/checksums, build -- all look good.
Thanks Chris!
--kevan
On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have posted a 3rd candidate for the Apache SIS 0.1-incubating release. The
> source code is at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apach
On 11/12/2010 3:28 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
One niggle: have you clarified somewhere that all the dependencies
licenses are Apache-compatible?
We have discussed this and the team believe they are licence
compatible. They have undertaken to remove any licence
incompatibilities during incubatio
On 12/11/2010 09:40, Nick Kew wrote:
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to accept
Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the proposal is
copied here for your convenience and can be found a
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:20 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
> someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
> votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
> for votes from Incubator PMC
On 12/11/10 08:40, Nick Kew wrote:
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to accept
Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the proposal is
copied here for your convenience and can be found a
On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
> accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
> proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found at
> http://wiki.apache.org/incuba
I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
for votes from Incubator PMC members or a separate Incubator PMC vote.
As justification, thi
41 matches
Mail list logo
