+1
2011/11/8 enterdv ente...@gmail.com:
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:55 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that using kill search is probably
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
+1
Great software and very useful for me in Brazil.
Best,
Jomar
-Original Message-
From: Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:53:41
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
cross-posting to incubator in case someone there also had to go through the
git to svn migration and can share their experience.
Is there a process we can follow to put s4 in the beta git program? I know
this can create additional work for the infra folks but seems we may
already have a beta
Leo,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Leo Neumeyer leoneume...@gmail.com wrote:
cross-posting to incubator in case someone there also had to go through the
git to svn migration and can share their experience.
I already mentioned you should take a look at this tool from Jukka Zitting;
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@thomersonfamily.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
In addition you can ask on wave-dev. They have finally decided to
loose history and do an initial checkin because it was not
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
In addition you can ask on wave-dev. They have finally decided to
loose history and do an initial checkin because it was not easily
possible to convert.
Why are we doing this on any project when we potentially have
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:01 PM, solomax solomax...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The
group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the
The Apache Rave (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of the Rave 0.5-INCUBATING Alpha release.
Apache Rave is a new web and social mashup engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box, as well as extendible, lightweight Java platform to
host, serve and manage
I'm curious if you also discussed using a hosted service like GitHub for
the projects. Seems to me that it would save us so much in resources and
time to take advantage of their free accounts for open source projects and
they seem to be doing a pretty good job. Perhaps there are concerns about
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Leo Neumeyer wrote:
Perhaps there are concerns about relying on a third party but for an
organization powered by volunteers, using a free service like this could
be a great benefit. Perhaps there are good reasons why this cannot be
done but was wondering if it was discussed
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
Since the official vote cut-off date has passed, I'd like to gently
remind that, with 6 +1 votes from the community members we
would be very grateful if somebody from the IPMC can take a look
at the bits and give us
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
Since the official vote cut-off date has passed, I'd like to gently
remind that, with 6 +1 votes from the community members we
would be very
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
incubation. They even went an extra mile and
18 matches
Mail list logo
