I'm not in favor of an Ombudsman. Seems like an extra
layer of overhead beyond what the Chair already provides. Seriously
does someone need a title in order to be the clearinghouse for folks'
honest assessments of the Incubator, its personnel, or other sensitive
issues?
My 2c.
Cheers,
Chris
+++
Hi Folks,
OK, this VOTE has passed with the following tallies:
+1
Chris Mattmann*
Vinod Kone
Benjamin Hindman
Benjamin Mahler
Yan Xiu
Deepal Jayasinghe
Brenden Matthews
Matei Zaharia
Ant Elder*
Konstantin Boudnik
Christian Grobmeier*
Henry Saputra*
Alex Karasulu*
Roman Shaposhnik*
Alan Cabrera*
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> C'mon Marvin. The project has enough ASF committers on the initial
> commiter list (ignoring mentors) to be able to conduct a committer
> vote.
>
> Lets not add unnecessary bureaucracy during the initial set-up phase.
Voting in a new committ
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Just curious, is the ombudsman not allowed to be a mentor for a podling?
> Otherwise, that podling doesn't have a safe third-party?
Good point. Podlings are heavily dependent on their Mentors, especially for
providing IPMC votes on releases.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
> So just chill out for a moment or two and try to take in the more
> substantive issue around having someone who is proactively tasked with
> gathering data about our overall performance as seen through the eyes of our
> consumers. This isn
I think one concern here is appropriation of a generic, specified-tied name to
an implementation, even a reference implementation.
"Apache OData" seems over-reaching in that respect, especially since there are
other projects, at ASF and elsewhere, that may employ OData bindings and
services of
Hey Ben,
Looks like we got a 3rd +1 from Tom W -- woot -- so we can proceed :)
Way to put a cherry on top since we're pushing on graduating now too!
Great work guys.
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
On Jun 17, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> I love having the (reference) implementation for OData specs, should help
> the adoption of the specifications.
>
> The immediate red flag is the homogeneous participation for initial
> committers. Any plan to add more diverse members as the i
Hi all,
thank you all for finally getting our long anticipated release out.
These are the results of the vote:
From IPMC members:
+1 Dave Fisher
+1 Nick Burch
+1 Joe Brockmeier
From PPMC members:
+1 Rob Weir
+1 Oliver Rau
+1 Florian Hopf
Other:
+1 Ian C
Regards
Florian
On 06.06.2013 07:43
+1 (verified checksum and signature, checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER).
Tom
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Benjamin Mahler
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
> (incubating) version 0.12.0. This will be the fourth incubator release for
> Mesos in Apache
On Jun 17, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> A paradox:
>
> The VP is not supposed to exercise authority in normal circumstances.
> Projects are supposed to have mentors that advocate for them. If a
> project comes 'to the ombudsman', whether that's the VP or not, what
> can this per
>
> From: Roman Shaposhnik
>To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer
>Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 3:26 PM
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] PodlingBillOfRights
>
>
>On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>> So isn't learning this bit of information a
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> ...I have tendered my resignation as VP, Incubator. The PMC has recommend
> Marvin Humphrey as my successor in a motion submitted to the
> Foundation board for consideration at the meeting next week
Many thanks Benson for your servic
I love having the (reference) implementation for OData specs, should help
the adoption of the specifications.
The immediate red flag is the homogeneous participation for initial
committers. Any plan to add more diverse members as the initial goals?
Does the project have contributions from external
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> So isn't learning this bit of information a crucial part of graduation?
>> After
>> all, once the project leaves the incubator its commiters and PMC won't have
>> an access to the Ombudsman, isn't it in all of our best interest to teach
>> t
+chris
Hey Chris, looks like we're stalled on releasing again. What are the rules
for a lack of IPMC participation in the 72 hour window? Can we proceed?
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> Unfortunately 0.12.0 was at a point where we had flaky tests, we're in
> much bett
Thanks a lot Sanjiva, Ross, Afkham!
debo
From: Afkham Azeez mailto:afk...@gmail.com>>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:05:14 +0530
To: mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>>
Cc: Debo~ Dutta mailto:dedu...@cisco.com>>
Subject: Re: Stratos proposal: is it possible to add another initial committer?
Added D
- Original Message -
> From: Roman Shaposhnik
> To: Joseph Schaefer
> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 2:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] PodlingBillOfRights
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Joseph Schaefer
> wrote:
>> The typical escalation path is ei
I'm also not worried about figuring out how to do stuff .. :-).
Sanjiva.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> C'mon Marvin. The project has enough ASF committers on the initial
> commiter list (ignoring mentors) to be able to conduct a committer
> vote.
>
> Lets not add unnec
Added Debo to the initial committer list.
Azeez
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> I have not closed the vote yet because it ran over the weekend. I did
> state I would leave it running into this week.
>
> As champion I have no objection to you adding Debo. Ultimately it
> r
C'mon Marvin. The project has enough ASF committers on the initial
commiter list (ignoring mentors) to be able to conduct a committer
vote.
Lets not add unnecessary bureaucracy during the initial set-up phase.
Ross
On 17 June 2013 19:01, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:37 AM
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> Debo Dutta, cc'ed, from Cisco, will be joining the project and it took a
> bit of time to get it sorted.
>
> I realize this is a late request as the VOTE is already running .. is it ok
> to add him now? ;-)
>
> If not we will bring him
I have not closed the vote yet because it ran over the weekend. I did
state I would leave it running into this week.
As champion I have no objection to you adding Debo. Ultimately it
reduces unnecessary traffic on this list since we won't have to
formally vote him in.
Ross
On 17 June 2013 18:37,
A paradox:
The VP is not supposed to exercise authority in normal circumstances.
Projects are supposed to have mentors that advocate for them. If a
project comes 'to the ombudsman', whether that's the VP or not, what
can this person do? All they can do is bring the matter to the
community. If it's
Debo Dutta, cc'ed, from Cisco, will be joining the project and it took a
bit of time to get it sorted.
I realize this is a late request as the VOTE is already running .. is it ok
to add him now? ;-)
If not we will bring him after the project starts.
Cheers,
Sanjiva.
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.
On 6/17/13, Klevenz, Stephan wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose the OData project to the Incubator.
>
> The OData Proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODataProposal
>
> We welcome your feedback and suggestions.
>
JFTR , at present there is an ongoing
Stephan
What overlap (if any) do you see with the existing Marmotta podling?
They are building out an implementation of the Linked Data Platform which
is a ongoing W3C standardization effort
(http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Main_Page) and can be thought of as a
more RDF/Semantic Web centric alter
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 08:52:38AM -0700, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> Problem: podlings are confused on where to go when there's a problem.
>
> Cause: we seem to collect/handle/organize problems in an ad hoc manner and
> sometimes mentors are the problem.
>
> Solution: we create an elected Incuba
+1
Dan
On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The accepta
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose the OData project to the Incubator.
The OData Proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODataProposal
We welcome your feedback and suggestions.
Thanks!
Stephan Klevenz
= Apache OData =
=== Abstract ===
Apache OData is a generic
Yes - we'll have a detailed one up for the next release. For now, building from
the tarballs (with a standard mvn clean install, in the order the repos are
listed below) should suffice - that'll cover compilation, unit tests, and RAT
check. Going forward, we'll have a guide for running the live
Hi,
I would love to vote on this, it would be nice to have a test procedure like
this one:
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/release-test-procedure.html
Cheers,
-sebastien
On Jun 16, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the third release candidate for Apache jcloud
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 12:12 AM, Florian Hopf wrote:
> the voting period has passed but we had another IPMC +1 from our mentor
> Nick Burch on odf-dev. Our other mentor Yegor seems to be pretty busy
> currently so it would be great if somebody else could have a look at the
> release candidate.
Done.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Klevenz, Stephan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> May I have permission to add and edit OData proposal on the Incubator
> wiki? My username is StephanKlevenz.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stephan
-
To unsubscri
Hello,
May I have permission to add and edit OData proposal on the Incubator wiki? My
username is StephanKlevenz.
Thanks!
Stephan
+1
...ant
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The
On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:19 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> ...
>> It's inconceivable to me that this will have an ounce of impact on either
>> someone of Sanjiva's accomplishments or a future podling with the momentum of
>> Stratos, but to ensu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
Marlon
On 6/16/13 12:15 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks Milinda
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski
>>
+1
Ruwan
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Milinda Pathirage <
milinda.pathir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks
> Milinda
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
>...
> It's inconceivable to me that this will have an ounce of impact on either
> someone of Sanjiva's accomplishments or a future podling with the momentum of
> Stratos, but to ensure that my positive assessment is communicated
> unequivoc
Good on you. Keep it up.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
41 matches
Mail list logo
