+1
-Anoop-
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Ashish wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Stack wrote:
>
> > Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> > posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
> >
> > Let us now move to a vote
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> > I just added the report for Twill. This was a day late because the
> > reporting schedule was initially set up quarterly instead of monthly, and
> > we were under the impression th
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:47 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>> I just added the report for Twill. This was a day late because the
>> reporting schedule was initially set up quarterly instead of monthly, and
>> we were under the impression that our
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> I just added the report for Twill. This was a day late because the
> reporting schedule was initially set up quarterly instead of monthly, and
> we were under the impression that our first report is due in January. The
> schedule was fixed e
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> I am only comfortable allowing singular IPMC votes from members of the ASF.
> I think the IPMC owes this much to the other members of the Foundation.
I've now contemplated this condition for a few days and while I'm prepared to
accept it for t
Congrats Andy!! Best wishes for the new role.
-Anoop-
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Avik Dey wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:39 PM, James Taylor
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats, Andrew!
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Incuba
Great! Congrats Lars.. All the best for the new role...
-Anoop-
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:14 AM, James Taylor wrote:
> Great news! Congrats, Lars!
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Incubator PMC has voted to offer membership to Lars Hofhansl, who
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Can I have edit access for the incubator wiki to add my shepherds report to
> the December report. My user name is "Justin Mclean".
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe,
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Stack wrote:
> Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>
> Let us now move to a vote.
>
> Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
>
> [] +1 Accept Ph
Hi,
Can I have edit access for the incubator wiki to add my shepherds report to
the December report. My user name is "Justin Mclean".
Thanks,
Justin
PS This may come though twice as I think my first email got stuck awaiting
moderation?
I just added the report for Twill. This was a day late because the
reporting schedule was initially set up quarterly instead of monthly, and
we were under the impression that our first report is due in January. The
schedule was fixed earlier today, and our report is now available.
One thing that I
+1 (binding)
On Friday, December 6, 2013, Stack wrote:
> Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>
> Let us now move to a vote.
>
> Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
>
> [] +1 Accept Phoenix int
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:38 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 December 2013 10:37, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey
>> wrote:
>>> ... Second, I'm amused that the "commits list" item was quietly dropped,
>>> but new checklist items have been inserted regarding
Great news! Congrats, Lars!
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Incubator PMC has voted to offer membership to Lars Hofhansl, who has
> accepted to joined the ranks.
>
> Lars is a seasoned member of HBase PMC with deep technical skills and he is
> also a proposed
Hi all,
Incubator PMC has voted to offer membership to Lars Hofhansl, who has
accepted to joined the ranks.
Lars is a seasoned member of HBase PMC with deep technical skills and he is
also a proposed mentor for the recently proposed Phoenix project.
Welcome Lars and thanks for your contributions
+1
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:39 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Congrats, Andrew!
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Incubator PMC has voted to offer membership to Andrew Purtell, who has
> > accepted to joined the ranks.
> >
> > Andrew is a true multi-pr
Congrats, Andrew!
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Incubator PMC has voted to offer membership to Andrew Purtell, who has
> accepted to joined the ranks.
>
> Andrew is a true multi-project person. He is HBase and Whirr PMC member and
> a Bigtop committer. He is
Hi all,
Incubator PMC has voted to offer membership to Andrew Purtell, who has
accepted to joined the ranks.
Andrew is a true multi-project person. He is HBase and Whirr PMC member and
a Bigtop committer. He is also a proposed mentor for the recently proposed
Phoenix project.
Welcome Andrew and
+1 (non binding)
— Patrick
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Anil Gupta wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Hope to see Phoenix in Apache family.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Stack wrote:
>> >
>> > Discus
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Anil Gupta wrote:
> +1
>
> Hope to see Phoenix in Apache family.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Stack wrote:
> >
> > Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> > posting on November 7th. Feedback
+1
Hope to see Phoenix in Apache family.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>
> Let us now move to a vote.
>
> Should Phoenix become a
On Dec 5, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Stack wrote:
> Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>
> Let us now move to a vote.
>
> Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
>
> [] +1 Accept Phoenix into the Incu
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Stack wrote:
> Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>
> Let us now move to a vote.
>
> Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
>
> [] +1
+1 (binding)
From: Stack
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 1:43 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Phoenix for incubator project
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
posting on November 7th. Feedback has been i
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Stack wrote:
> Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>
> Let us now move to a vote.
>
> Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
>
> [] +1 Accept Phoenix into the Incu
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Stack wrote:
> Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>
> Let us now move to a vote.
>
> Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
>
> [] +1 Accept Phoenix into the Incub
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
Let us now move to a vote.
Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
[] +1 Accept Phoenix into the Incubator
[] +0 Don't care whether or which
[] -1 Do not accept
On 5 December 2013 10:37, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>> ...3.6 Release consists of source code only, no binaries
>>
>> Technically we allow some "binary" form
On 5 Dec 2013, at 6:41, David Crossley wrote:
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
i just added the ripple report for december (its the same as
november).
We were to late in november. however the report template generator
didn't
include us in genera
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> ...3.6 Release consists of source code only, no binaries
>
> Technically we allow some "binary" formats like .jpg, .png, etc. in releases
> without the corresponding c
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/votes/$PODLING/$RC
> ...
Added to a new "usage proposal" section at
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReleaseChecklist - does that
proposal work for you guys?
(and thinking about
Taylor,
your mentors should read the mailing lists. Why I would not expect to
get answers when a question is hidden in a technical detail question, a
subject line with [MENTOR] in it should draw attention. I expect mentors
to read all subject lines.
Other tags mentors should watch is [VOTE]
32 matches
Mail list logo
