On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
Greets,
I read in the Tajo report and I see on the dev list that the Tajo
developers
are now diligently tackling IP clearance:
http://s.apache.org/00w
In my view, IP clearance is only the remain work
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@gmail.com wrote:
That was also my understanding, that IP clearance is important, and
neccessary for successful incubation, but incubator releases are orthogonal
and therefore carry a disclaimer being not fully vetted Apache
My understanding is that incubating releases can have small IP loose
ends, but not that they can proceed before the main clearance of an
initial code donation.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Bernd Fondermann
On Dec 6, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/votes/$PODLING/$RC
On Dec 5, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I am only comfortable allowing singular IPMC votes from members of the ASF.
I think the IPMC owes this much to the other members of the Foundation.
I've now
On 6 December 2013 20:55, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:38 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 December 2013 10:37, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Tue, Dec
So please instead of discussing again about procedures.
Just discuss about the release :-)
/me trying to rock the boat
On 7 December 2013 12:05, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:23 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wanted to clarify
Enthusiastic +1 for Phoenix.
Thanks,
Eli
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me; Phoenix is good for HBase and Apache is good for Phoenix, a
virtuous cycle!
On Thursday, December 5, 2013, Stack wrote:
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:55 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
All the stuff required to be checked when voting on a release should be
documented in the ASF doc about releases. That its not in that doc suggests
its not required. If someone thinks something is required then they should
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
We have a lot of pending votes and I see you guys discussing about
rules why not spend your times on having a look at those votes...
If we succeed in changing the system so that my participation doesn't let AWOL
Mentors off
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
So please instead of discussing again about procedures.
Just discuss about the release :-)
/me trying to rock the boat
Sirona has FIVE Mentors, plus another committer who is on the IPMC. Only two
of you have voted: you and
Hi,
Been following the thread and noticed one of the items on the list is:
Issue tracker clean for release version.
Is that really expected? I would expect progress and issue closed since
last release but not everything in the issue tracker addressed. Is it clear
what clean means in this
12 matches
Mail list logo
