-- Forwarded message --
From: Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
Date: Feb 10, 2014 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: Tool to generate disclaimer, NOTICE, etc. files
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Alan Cabrera
My apologies if this has been asked before or is well documented somewhere. If
it is I couldn't find it.
What is the process for handling contrib module code donations from an IP
clearance perspective?
Example #1 (https://github.com/ptgoetz/storm-jms)
An individual (me in this case) wishes to
My apologies if this has been asked before or is well documented somewhere. If
it is I couldn't find it.
What is the process for handling contrib module code donations from an IP
clearance perspective?
Example #1 (https://github.com/ptgoetz/storm-jms)
An individual (me in this case) wishes to
The basic idea is that you have to have the right to incorporate the code
and be able to demonstrate that right.
For example #1, you can switch your contributions to ASL2 and be good, but
you may have problems with the contributions of the others unless the
contributions are trivial.
For example
On 2/16/14 6:28 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
-1. files check out, but Allura doesn't work :(
checksums match, installation works, though not very well on ubuntu
minimal 13.10, dependencies cannot be met, I had to rewrite
requiements-common.txt to use Ming 0.4.3 instead of 0.4.2 which doesn't
Thanks Ted.
Regarding contributions, if someone contributes (e.g. A pull request) to a
project with an established license, couldn't that be considered an implicit
grant of rights unless otherwise specified (e.g. License headers)?
-Taylor
On Feb 17, 2014, at 6:19 PM, Ted Dunning
Judgement call depending on what you might
consider a reasonable size for a minor fix
versus an independent work (e.g. new module).
The larger the patch the more likely you should
consider having the author file some paperwork with
Apache to cover the contribution.
HTH
On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:20
yeah.
What Joe said.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.comwrote:
Judgement call depending on what you might
consider a reasonable size for a minor fix
versus an independent work (e.g. new module).
The larger the patch the more likely you should
consider
Hi Everyone,
This VOTE has passed with the following tallies:
+1
Chris Mattmann*
Alan Gates*
Larry McCay
Dilli Arumugam
Kevin Minder
Henry Saputra*
* - indicates IPMC
Thanks for VOTE'ing. I'll paste the resolution into the agenda.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Chris
Thanks Ted and Joe for the clarification. It helps a lot.
-Taylor
On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:18 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah.
What Joe said.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Joseph Schaefer
joe_schae...@yahoo.comwrote:
Judgement call depending on what you might
10 matches
Mail list logo
