Hi Subhasis,
You might want to checkout https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html
Regards
Srikanth Sundarrajan
-
From: subhasis.go...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:42:44 +0530
Subject: help needed
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
We're now looking for
At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that
podlings.xml has been updated.
Some podlings may include a note on their status page (Alois), others
(Awf) don't.
Neither Alois nor Awf have any indication on their web-pages that the
podling has been retired.
As well as
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Subhasis Gorai
subhasis.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, I felt, before coming up with the
proposal I need to get a champion who will guide me.
Now I didn't know how to find a champion and that's the reason I had shared
the idea, anticipating if someone is
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings
past and present in a single rather long page.
It might be better to have individual pages for the
current/graduated/retired podlings, with a much simpler one-line
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that
podlings.xml has been updated.
Some podlings may include a note on their status page (Alois), others
(Awf) don't.
Neither Alois nor Awf have any indication on
On 24 March 2014 21:09, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that
podlings.xml has been updated.
Some podlings may include a note on their status page
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
That's much easier to do than updating the website.
I'll add the missing redirects.
Excellent, thank you sebb!
And once that has been done, the contents won't be accessible
externally so such websites can presumably then be
On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings
past and present in a single rather long page.
It might be better to have individual pages for
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 12:06 PM, sebb wrote:
On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings
past and present in a single rather long page.
On 25 March 2014 01:18, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 12:06 PM, sebb wrote:
On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project List [1] currently shows full
sebb:
Not always, for example
OpenOffice.org = ooo
The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps resourceAlias) is to access SVN
Repositories are linked from the podling status page, though it is admittedly
not as convenient to get there in two hops.
Many recent podlings use Git -- often
On 25 March 2014 01:46, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
sebb:
Not always, for example
OpenOffice.org = ooo
The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps resourceAlias) is to access SVN
Repositories are linked from the podling status page, though it is admittedly
not as
13 matches
Mail list logo
