Hi,
The vote passes with 7 +1 votes (including 3 IPMC votes) and no -1's.
Binding Votes:
Chris Mattmann
Justin Mclean
Suresh Maru
Non-Binding Votes:
Mirko Kaempf
Evert Lammerts
John D. Ament
Rahul Sharma
Thanks everyone for voting and for pointing out issues with our RC's.
HI Suresh,
Thanks for the vote, I think we can make a few JIRAs and then target them
in the next release.
For now, I am not sure of removing the .settings, .classpath, .project. We
have kept this configuration in our repo. FWIW, this is an eclipse plugin
and a few configurations have been packed
Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top Level
Project. The board resolution is included below.
[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP because…
Cheers,
Suresh
=== Board Resolution =
Hi Suresh,
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Stratos PPMC,
>
> Can you verify if all the names listed are indeed PMC? I would assume so
> since stratos has been following PPMC=Committer.
>
>
Yes, we followed PPMC=Committer. And there is a request from Mohammad
Noureldin and
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:44 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the
> incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three
> releases, increased our contributor and committer list [2], and have
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> One could imagine as part of the case for incubation and graduation both an
> articulation of the project's place in the larger ecosystem, similar to how
> academic papers customarily place their work and novel findings within the
> larger fi
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Kasper Sørensen <
kasper.soren...@humaninference.com> wrote:
> - Can you explain or link to more information about the type inference you
> mention?
>
The type inferencing is used by Drill.
The problem is that strong typing is normally required to parse SQL
state
One could imagine as part of the case for incubation and graduation both an
articulation of the project's place in the larger ecosystem, similar to how
academic papers customarily place their work and novel findings within the
larger field in 'Related Work'. If not part of the initial proposal, the
Unfortunately, similar projects entering Apache incubator are common things =(
Even though each original project proposers can argue about
differences in one way or another, it will eventually decided by
adoption and community growth, and at the end the quality of the
project itself.
Some other i
+1
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:44 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the
> incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three
> releases, increased our contributor and committer list [2], and
+1
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:44 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the
> incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three
> releases, increased our contributor and committer list [2], and
I am certainly not questioning the power of Optiq. Just noting that I think it
has a lot of similarities, and obviously there are differences. But even in
your list I find a lot of the points to be close or similar. I would hate to
start a war over words in this thread, since I actually only wan
Hey Robert
You are all set
-Jake
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need write access to the incubator wiki to add the monthly report for the
> Stratosphere project here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2014
> My username is "rmetzger".
>
>
>
> Robert
>
Hi,
I need write access to the incubator wiki to add the monthly report for the
Stratosphere project here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2014
My username is "rmetzger".
Robert
+1 We are delighted to join the Apache Incubator
On 1 May 2014 19:35, Martin Harris wrote:
> Great news! Thanks everyone :-)
> On 1 May 2014 19:34, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:49:02AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> > > Based on the previous discussion of accepting Br
Great news! Thanks everyone :-)
On 1 May 2014 19:34, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:49:02AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> > Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> > Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
> >
> > [ ] +1
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:49:02AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
Apache Hive has recently started work to integrate with Optiq as well. Having
it as an Apache project will be good for both Optiq and Apache.
Alan.
On Apr 30, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> I would like to propose Optiq as an Apache Incubator project. I have
> posted the proposa
On May 1, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Marlon Pierce wrote:
> I also do not wish to be on the PMC after graduation [1]
ACK. Will remove from the vote email.
Suresh
>
> Marlon
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stratos-dev/201404.mbox/%3C533C0454.3000304%40iu.edu%3E
>
> On 5/
I also do not wish to be on the PMC after graduation [1]
Marlon
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stratos-dev/201404.mbox/%3C533C0454.3000304%40iu.edu%3E
On 5/1/14 10:21 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Stratos PPMC,
>
> Can you verify if all the names listed are indeed PMC? I woul
On May 1, 2014, at 10:26 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 1 May 2014 15:16, Suresh Marru wrote:
>> Since there were no issues raised on the DISCUSS thread, I will start the
>> graduation vote now.
>
> There was 1 issue:
>
> Mohammad Noureldin does not want to be part of the initial PMC
>
> Also I asked
On 1 May 2014 15:16, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Since there were no issues raised on the DISCUSS thread, I will start the
> graduation vote now.
There was 1 issue:
Mohammad Noureldin does not want to be part of the initial PMC
Also I asked if the podling is aware that the initial PMC is as per
the
Stratos PPMC,
Can you verify if all the names listed are indeed PMC? I would assume so since
stratos has been following PPMC=Committer.
Suresh
On May 1, 2014, at 10:15 AM, sebb wrote:
> This reminds me:
>
> I assume the podling is aware that the names listed in the proposed
> board resoluti
Since there were no issues raised on the DISCUSS thread, I will start the
graduation vote now.
Suresh
On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> +1 to graduate.
>
> I'd like to echo Paul's sentiments .. thanks for the support and nudging!
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29,
This reminds me:
I assume the podling is aware that the names listed in the proposed
board resolution will become the initial PMC?
i.e. everyone listed in the resolution will become a PMC member (and committer).
There was at least one recent graduation where this was not understood.
They expected
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014, at 10:44 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from
> the
> incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made
> three
> releases, increased our contributor and committer list [2], and
Hi Rahul,
+ 1 for the release.
I found few non-blocking improvements you want to make for next release. I
debated if they need to be fixed now, but creating JIRA’s and assuring to be
fixed for next release should do.
* The NOTICE file has Eclipse icon and SLF4J license url’s, both of them are
Hi all,
Just wondering if any other IPMCs have had a chance to look at this vote.
I know that they'd love to be able to show the release on their report
this quarter.
For what it's worth, here's my non binding +1.
John
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> So
+1
On Apr 30, 2014, at 10:44 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the
> incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three
> releases, increased our contributor and committer list [2], and hav
I agree with Ted. Optiq is a full fledged cost-based query optimization
framework for relational workloads.
I also want to highlight Optiq's JDBC infrastructure (and ODBC at a later
point as well). Rather than implementing the JDBC specification, Optiq
users only have to implement a few interfaces
I think that there is a huge difference between Metamodel and Optiq.
In particular:
- Optiq provides real SQL including nested queries, correlated sub-queries
and so on
- Metamodel uses a fluent Java API ... SQL parsing and transformation
doesn't appear to be a goal
- Optiq provides highly adva
31 matches
Mail list logo