+1
On 14 June 2014 04:36, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and
> called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@ mailing list [3] about retiring the
> podling. That VOTE has passed with no -1s and 4 (binding) +1s from the
> podling PMC/comm
On 06/13/2014 05:17 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Personally, I don't feel this is a big deal. The PMC size is appropriate
> given the overall project size. That said, I'd like to make two points:
>* in general, for a smaller project like Celix I'd like to encourage folks
> to consider PMC
Hey Marvin
That is correct, gradle.jar is the only binary and that is able to be a
fixed repeatable build via a wrapper task in the build.gradle file. After
re-reading the policies I'm in agreement with them and dont think that we
need to make an exception for this. Each project can create a second
+1 (binding)
LIeGrue,
strub
On Saturday, 14 June 2014, 16:10, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>+1, binding.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Per recent discussions on
