Dear Nicholas Goodman,
This message acknowledges receipt of the following document, which has been
filed in the Apache Software Foundation records:
SGA From DynamoBI Corporation for OPTIQ in Incubation
-- Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
Chris
Regardless of whether it is an explicit requirement to have some specific level
of diversity, there is a requirement that the group demonstrate community
building.
The page in question may be incorrect, but as it stands it does not appear that
a diverse community has been built.
I
Hi Ted,
-Original Message-
From: Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Sunday, June 22, 2014 6:36 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tez graduation [Was: Request for mentor
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:37 AM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote:
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
0.9.2. This will be the 2nd release of Apache Storm.
Release vote result:
I'm looking at the release vote result and I'm seeing only one binding vote
from a IPMC member. Am I comparing the vote results against the wrong IPMC
roster?
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
Regards,
Alan
P.S. Apologies if this is a duplicate email.
On Jun
Alan,
That was the result of the PPMC vote on the dev@ list. Arvind is a mentor.
-Taylor
On Jun 22, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
I'm looking at the release vote result and I'm seeing only one binding vote
from a IPMC member. Am I comparing the vote results
+1
Thanks for the work,
Gerrit Binnenmars
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Julian,
There are a few more messages from this sender in the moderator queue
that I'm looking at, and while I agree they don't add a great deal of
value, I'm struggling to see the goal if they are (malicious) spam.
I'm guessing we don't want to ban people for being misguided, or lack of
insight
It's laudable that you should give this individual the benefit of the doubt. I
agree, the motivation is not as simple as malicious spam. But their behavior
has been disruptive.
Maybe contact them and ask them why they want to be on the list? We don't want
to ban people, but the entity behind
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 05:54AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
To this end, I'd like to prose a very simplistic criteria
for a potential retirement from the incubator: unless both
of of the following applies project get
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:54 PM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.2 incubating.
Apache MRQL is a query processing and optimization system for
large-scale, distributed data analysis, built on top of
There are some Thrift generated files that don't seem to have the AL prepended.
I'm not sure if that's important since the files were automatically generated;
imo, it's not.
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:37 AM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote:
This is a call for
Only IPMC members' votes are binding until the podling is out of the incubator.
This release will need at least 3 of those votes. However, any IPMC +1 votes
will carry over to this current vote.
If I counted correctly, this release has one from the earlier vote plus mine.
I think it needs
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Since entering Incubation in November 2010, the Celix podling been working
towards graduation. The community has grown, releases have been made and
new committers have been
On Jun 22, 2014, at 10:30 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
If I counted correctly, this release has one from the earlier vote plus mine.
I think it needs one more IPMC member's vote.
NM, I just read Marvin's email about the new release process that I was unaware
of. :)
My position on this sort of thing has shifted a whole lot over the last few
years. I used to be very careful about offending bots but after dealing
hundreds of these accounts on MapR user facing sites, I am way less sympathetic.
Kudos for humanity but I recommend not losing much sleep here.
16 matches
Mail list logo
