Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
This sounds good to me. On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Jacques Nadeau wrote: > This vote thread looks like a hanging chad. The current vote count is: > > +1 Ted > +1 Lars > +1 Justin > +1 or -1: Grant > -0 Jan > > I would love to have a clarification vote from Grant. I read his concern > and the subsequent messages to mean +1 but I'm a bit biased as I'd like to > see this release go out. Whatever the case, I suggest we give 24 hours for > additional feedback and then finish the vote. If Grant does not clarify > his stance, I propose that we ignore his ambiguous vote. Steven, how does > that sound? > > thanks, > Jacques > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:24 AM, sebb wrote: > > > > > > If it contains sources, it's not a binary release. > > > > > > Not strictly true. Binary artifacts often contain source code examples. > > > > > > Also, for Drill specifically, the code generation strategy that Drill > uses > > requires that snippets of source for different operators and system > > packaged UDF's will be in the binary release. The user has no clue about > > this source, much of which is machine generated from templates. > > > > From the user's point of view, however, it is a binary distro because > they > > can download it and run Drill with no further build steps. > > > -- Steven Phillips Software Engineer mapr.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
This vote thread looks like a hanging chad. The current vote count is: +1 Ted +1 Lars +1 Justin +1 or -1: Grant -0 Jan I would love to have a clarification vote from Grant. I read his concern and the subsequent messages to mean +1 but I'm a bit biased as I'd like to see this release go out. Whatever the case, I suggest we give 24 hours for additional feedback and then finish the vote. If Grant does not clarify his stance, I propose that we ignore his ambiguous vote. Steven, how does that sound? thanks, Jacques On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:24 AM, sebb wrote: > > > > If it contains sources, it's not a binary release. > > > > Not strictly true. Binary artifacts often contain source code examples. > > > Also, for Drill specifically, the code generation strategy that Drill uses > requires that snippets of source for different operators and system > packaged UDF's will be in the binary release. The user has no clue about > this source, much of which is machine generated from templates. > > From the user's point of view, however, it is a binary distro because they > can download it and run Drill with no further build steps. >
Re: [VOTE] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Following the discussion earlier in the thread: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45241.html > > I would like to call a Vote for accepting Taverna as a new incubator > project. > > The proposal is available at: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TavernaProposal > > Vote is open until at least Sunday, 19th October 2014, 23:59:00 UTC > > [ ] +1 accept Lens in the Incubator > [ ] ±0 > [ ] -1 because... +1 (binding) Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Perhaps this can be a good addition to wimsy
OpenSource Project Name Checker: https://github.com/LogIN-/ospnc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
