Re: [VOTE] Apache Tamaya for Incubation

+1 (binding) LieGrue, strub On Tuesday, 11 November 2014, 12:20, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Anatole, Actually the name suitability is a long, drawn out process. i started it here just now for the project: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-60

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.2 (incubating)

This vote passes with 3 +1s and no 0 or -1 votes: +1 Steven Noels (mentor) +1 John D. Ament +1 Alan Gates (mentor) Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors. Julian - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.4.0 (incubating) - (formally known as Apache Argus)

The Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Ranger 0.4.0 (incubating). This will be our first release since the project entered incubation in July 2014 as Apache Argus and then, got it renamed as Apache Ranger. The ranger-0.4.0-rc3 release candidate is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tamaya for Incubation

+1 regards, gerhard 2014-11-13 9:16 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: +1 (binding) LieGrue, strub On Tuesday, 11 November 2014, 12:20, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Anatole, Actually the name suitability is a long, drawn out process. i started it

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] Sling Sightly and XSS modules

Hi, On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:36 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: ...I am a bit concerned about the notation Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright: will be done once the donation is incorporated in the Sling codebase,

IP clearance clarification: copyright notices

Hi, In the vote thread about [1] a question came up about the following clause, from our IP clearance form: Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright. I think this actually covers two distinct things: 1) Moving any existing

Re: IP clearance clarification: copyright notices

On 13 November 2014 11:18, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi, In the vote thread about [1] a question came up about the following clause, from our IP clearance form: Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been updated to reflect the new ASF

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tamaya for Incubation

+1 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: +1 regards, gerhard 2014-11-13 9:16 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: +1 (binding) LieGrue, strub On Tuesday, 11 November 2014, 12:20, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tamaya for Incubation

[ X ] +1 accept Tamaya in the Incubator [ ] ±0 [ ] -1 because... Cheers Daniel S. Haischt On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: +1 regards, gerhard

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format (incubating) 2.2.0 RC2

On 11/12/2014 07:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: The use of tags has come up several times on the incubator list in the past. They're not immutable, linking to a tag can be over-written. Please link to the appropriate commit, which in your case is likely

Re: IP clearance clarification: copyright notices

On 11/13/14, 2:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi, In the vote thread about [1] a question came up about the following clause, from our IP clearance form: Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright.

[PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

Abstract OpenAz is a project to create tools and libraries to enable the development of Attribute-based Access Control (ABAC) Systems in a variety of languages. In general the work is at least consistent with or actually conformant to the OASIS XACML Standard. Proposal Generally the work

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

Could you add more description on what is PEP and PDP and other acronyms used in the proposal? If it is not directly relevant maybe you can rephrase it to more generic analogy. Thanks, Henry On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Hal Lockhart hal.lockh...@oracle.com wrote: Abstract OpenAz is a

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

It'e really unlikely I will be able to contribute in any way to this any time soon, but I think it would be awesome if this was at apache. When I tried to investigate xacml a few years ago the major stumbling block I found was not being able to look at any reasonable implementation. (I

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

Hal, Per customs, would you mind if we cancel this and start with a [DISCUSS] thread about OpenAZ? It's unclear if you meant this to be a vote or something. John On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Hal Lockhart hal.lockh...@oracle.com wrote: Abstract OpenAz is a project to create tools and

Re: IP clearance clarification: copyright notices

I think it's good to be flexible here depending on the project's needs. A fresh project might need more help that is easiest to achieve after transitioning the code to Apache. Some of the terminology of the incubator assumes the incubator project is showing up on the Apache doorstep with a USB

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format (incubating) 2.2.0 RC2

+1 We need votes from the incubator PMC, right? Julien On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Ryan Blue b...@cloudera.com wrote: On 11/12/2014 07:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: The use of tags has come up several times on the incubator list in the past. They're not immutable, linking to a tag can be

RE: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

No, I am sorry this process is all new to me. I also created a page in the wiki with same content. (OpenAZProposal) Do I need to do something or can you cancel it? Hal -Original Message- From: John D. Ament [mailto:john.d.am...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 5:03 PM

RE: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

Did you see the background section? I meant that to provide that information. I was unclear on how much to assume the audience already knows about the subject. Hal -Original Message- From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.sapu...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 4:31 PM To:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format (incubating) 2.2.0 RC2

On 11/13/2014 02:21 PM, Julien Le Dem wrote: +1 We need votes from the incubator PMC, right? Julien That's right, this vote requires at least 3 +1s from IPMC members to pass. I know that some of our mentors are out of town, so it would be helpful if anyone has time to take a look at the RC.

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

Ah my bad, I usually use abstract section to get main idea of the proposal. And as per John request, lets start with DISCUSS thread instead. - Henry On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Hal Lockhart hal.lockh...@oracle.com wrote: Did you see the background section? I meant that to provide that

Re: [VOTE] Retire HDT

CC¹ing folks from general@incubator.a.o as they can likely explain (am currently getting ready for a flight back from Italy to Los Angeles and won¹t have time for a bit, Bob). ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format (incubating) 2.2.0 RC2

+1 (binding) Checked signature, md5 and that files were properly licensed. LGTM. St.Ack On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Ryan Blue b...@apache.org wrote: Hi everyone, I'd like to propose a vote to release parquet-format-2.2.0-rc2 as the official Parquet Format 2.2.0 release. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format (incubating) 2.2.0 RC2

+1 sig/xsum are valid. RAT ran clean and the checklist looks fine to me (license/notice/disclaimer/etc... are all good, etc...) Patrick On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Ryan Blue b...@apache.org wrote: Hi everyone, I'd like to propose a vote to release parquet-format-2.2.0-rc2 as the

RE: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

So you want me to repost the proposal with the Subject changed to start with [DISCUSS]? Or should I simply reference the wiki page? Hal -Original Message- From: John D. Ament [mailto:john.d.am...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 5:03 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

I think so. There's a few things that you want to iron out first, before people start voting on this. - 3 is generally the minimum number of mentors. - I can't find a Paul Freemantle on the apache committers list. There's a Paul Fremantle, minor spelling difference. - You may want to review

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache MetaModel from the Incubator

My vote: +1 (binding) On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, The Apache MetaModel community has wrapped up the VOTE to propose for graduation from Apache incubator. The VOTE passed with result: 9 binding +1s zero 0s zero -1s

[VOTE] Graduation of Apache MetaModel from the Incubator

Hi All, The Apache MetaModel community has wrapped up the VOTE to propose for graduation from Apache incubator. The VOTE passed with result: 9 binding +1s zero 0s zero -1s (http://bit.ly/1u8n8eo) Apache MetaModel came into ASF incubator on 2013 and since then have grown into small but active

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache MetaModel from the Incubator

+1 (binding). Henry great job helping to lead the way of a great project through the Incubator as a mentor. Good luck MetaModel! Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache MetaModel from the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, The Apache MetaModel community has wrapped up the VOTE to propose for graduation from Apache incubator. The VOTE passed with result: 9 binding +1s zero 0s zero -1s (http://bit.ly/1u8n8eo)