On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Luke Han luke...@gmail.com wrote:
...I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Kylin as a new incubator
project...
+1, binding
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Arvind
Thank you for offering to be a mentor. The proposal has been updated.
Arvind Prabhakar (StreamSets) arvind at apache dot org
One of the comments we have received thus far is a potential concern of
whether multiple communities/projects can exist in similar problem areas.
Your background
Hi,
one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing
dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their approach [1],
and I think could be useful. See for instance the dashboard they
provided for Apache CloudStack [2].
I already discussed it with Roman, and I
+1 binding
On 18 November 2014 19:43, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Slider project has voted to release 0.60.0-incubating. The team
voted to release these artifacts with 6 +1's and nothing else. 2 of the 6
votes were from IPMC members.
Vote thread:
Very interesting project!
I'm happy to help mentoring it.
On 20/11/14 03:02, Joe Witt wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project.
In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version of the
proposal can be found here:
+1 (binding)
On 20/11/14 23:31, Luke Han wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201411.mbox/%3ccakmqrob22+n+r++date33f3pcpyujhfoeaqrms3t-udjwk6...@mail.gmail.com%3e
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Kylin as a
+1 (binding)
Looks good to me.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Slider project has voted to release 0.60.0-incubating. The team
voted to release these artifacts with 6 +1's and nothing else. 2 of the 6
votes were from IPMC members.
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal
Note that AFAICS some of the nominated mentors are not members of the
Incubator PMC [1] - they cannot be formal incubation mentors then.
ASF members can join that PMC just
Bertrand,
Understood. I had noticed other proposals listing these folks as mentors
but also providing their IPMC status along side. I'll do the same for now
and if they join the ipmc i'll update it and if they end up not doing so
will remove them. If that is not reasonable then just let me
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
...I had noticed other proposals listing these folks as mentors
but also providing their IPMC status along side. I'll do the same for now
and if they join the ipmc i'll update it and if they end up not doing so
will
I've advised Joe to 'asterix' the would-be mentors who are not iPMC yet, so
that he can proceed to a vote on the base of the ones who are sooner rather
than later, and the stragglers can be formally added to the metadata once
they are on the iPMC.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Sergio Fernández
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at wrote:
Hi,
one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing
dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their approach [1], and
I think could be useful. See for instance the
I agree with David.
For example, many projects are now mirrored to github, and github has
very good analytics:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pulse
https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/graphs/contributors
And, I don't have to log an INFRA JIRA to get them. Which makes both
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
Here is my [+1]
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
Here is my [+1]
--
Sean
Great stuff, +1
On Thursday, November 20, 2014, Luke Han luke...@gmail.com wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201411.mbox/%3ccakmqrob22+n+r++date33f3pcpyujhfoeaqrms3t-udjwk6...@mail.gmail.com%3e
I would like to
Hey Benson
Can you please include the proposal with the vote, the wiki page can change
or be removed and the mailing list acts as the archive for the initial
proposal.
-Jake
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1, best wishes... based on revision #25[1]
--tim
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal?action=recallrev=25
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive
One down side to the github provided analytics is that projects may be
restricted in how they can make use of those analytics in e.g.
presentations. Github has previously asserted that those analytic outputs
are subject to a license grant from github and requested sign off in the
form of a user
+1 (binding). Good luck!
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email:
Hi All,
The Apache Aurora project has voted to release 0.6.0-incubating, our second
release. The team voted in favor of this release with 7 binding +1s, 1
non-binding +1. 3 of the binding +1 votes were from IPMC members.
Vote thread:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
...I am generally against us standing up our own service that does this.
We've had a couple of these systems over the years. (pulse.a,o for
instance). It takes a non-trivial amount of work to setup and maintain
such a
This vote passes with 3 +1's. Billie's vote was cast on dev@slider.
Spoke with her directly and she said that she did forward the vote to
general@incubator but I haven't seen it (not sure if it's just me..)
Summary:
+1 Steve Loughran
+1 Billie Rinaldi
+1 John Ament
Thank you to those who took
On 21 November 2014 20:44, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
...I am generally against us standing up our own service that does this.
We've had a couple of these systems over the years. (pulse.a,o for
We already evaluated the Bitergia offering - it is expensive and does not
provide sufficient benefit for the money (don't get me started on how metrics
are not a good evaluator of open source code...)
I fully agree with the comments below.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: jan i
+1
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
Here is my [+1]
--
Note - I should say my comment below is in the context of a not-for-profit
software foundation using their services. People in different use cases should
look at their specific circumstances - obviously :-D
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
+1 -C
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
Here is my [+1]
+1 (binding)
On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 1:58:34 PM Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
Here is my [+1]
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:35 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Sergio Fernández
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at wrote:
Hi,
one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing
dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their
Sergio, I think there's no need to ask for permission
in this particular case, unless you'd need to have
INFRA help you obtaining information that is not
publicly available.
But then again, knowing what this information is
would be useful anyway ;-)
So yeah... go ahead! I'd like to help as much
What, the whole text? OK.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
Hey Benson
Can you please include the proposal with the vote, the wiki page can change
or be removed and the mailing list acts as the archive for the initial
proposal.
-Jake
On Fri, Nov 21,
= NiFi Proposal =
== Abstract ==
Ni``Fi is a dataflow system based on the concepts of flow-based programming.
== Proposal ==
Ni``Fi supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing,
transformation, and system mediation logic. Some of the high-level
capabilities and objectives of
+1
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:00 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 1:58:34 PM Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful
and
positive conversation, so I offer this
+1 (binding)
-Jake
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
Here is my [+1]
From what I understand, that Accumulo may or may not suffer from
bifurcation is debatable despite this blanket claim otherwise.
Regardless, Sean's point is valid, even if only a theoretical concern for
NiFi at this point. If the podling is interested in growing outside
community I'd be happy to
I would tend to disagree with your assertion about Accumulo, but this is
neither the time nor the place to discuss Accumulo's strengths and
weaknesses.
I'll make the assumption that request to enter incubation is a strong
intent to grow outside of the project's current home.
+1
I didn't make an assertion *about* Accumulo, what I said exactly was:
that Accumulo may or may not suffer from bifurcation is
debatable
I assert there are two sides to that argument (I've heard them both),
merely to suggest that Sean's concerns should not be dismissed as they
were.
Thanks for the clarification -- that wasn't how it came across to me.
Andrew Purtell wrote:
I didn't make an assertion *about* Accumulo, what I said exactly was:
that Accumulo may or may not suffer from bifurcation is
debatable
I assert there are two sides to that argument (I've
+1 (non-binding)
rb
On 11/21/2014 01:54 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
+1 (binding)
-Jake
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote
Andrew - appreciate your comments and offer to assist as a mentor. Now
that the vote for incubation has kicked off i'm not sure what i'm allowed
to do or not. Will check will Benson.
For what it is worth I agree Sean raised a great point. I think it will be
an important part of our community
+1 ( binding)
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
Here is my [+1]
--
Best
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
+1
-Bertrand
-
To
+1 - binding
On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
Here is my [+1]
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 20, 2014, at 2:31 PM, Luke Han luke...@gmail.com wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201411.mbox/%3ccakmqrob22+n+r++date33f3pcpyujhfoeaqrms3t-udjwk6...@mail.gmail.com%3e
I would
+1 (non-binding)
Great proposal!
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 16:22 Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
+1 - binding
On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful
and
positive
Andrew - I've updated the proposal to reflect you as a mentor.
* Andrew Purtell (Salesforce) apurtell at apache dot org, IPMC Member
Thanks again
Joe
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew - appreciate your comments and offer to assist as a mentor. Now
47 matches
Mail list logo
