Re: CCLA's and SGA's

2015-02-12 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
> On 09 Feb 2015, at 15:08, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > These are all different vehicles for different things. > > The SGA is basically a formal code-donation to the ASF. It > provides deep IP provenance. > > A CCLA is a document that sez that a company is aware that its > employee(s) is/are work

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-12 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
Hi Marvin, On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:17 PM, wrote: > > > Awesome! > > These days, the Sponsoring Entity is rarely anything other than the > Incubator. > It means that a TLP other than the Incubator has voted to take charge of > incubating the project, supervising mentoring and monitoring progre

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-12 Thread Enrico Daga
On 12 February 2015 at 14:50, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Enrico Daga wrote: > >> Marvin, if you can enable EnricoDaga, I might need it for the future ;) > > Done. Great, thank you! Enrico > > Cheers, > > Marvin Humphrey > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-12 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Enrico Daga wrote: > Marvin, if you can enable EnricoDaga, I might need it for the future ;) Done. Cheers, Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org Fo

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-12 Thread Enrico Daga
Sergio, thank you! Marvin, if you can enable EnricoDaga, I might need it for the future ;) Thanks! Enrico -- Enrico Daga http://about.me/enridaga On 12 February 2015 at 14:08, Sergio Fernández wrote: > Enrico, the wiki requires karma to edit. > No problem. it's easier I directly add you. > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-12 Thread Sergio Fernández
On 11/02/15 19:53, Marvin Humphrey wrote: This is going to be a fun and easy job. Sergio is deeply committed, Andy is one of the IPMC's best, Benedikt has signed on to represent Commons, and the sophistication of the emails in this thread speaks for itself. Who's in? I do agree with Marvin, s

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-12 Thread Sergio Fernández
Enrico, the wiki requires karma to edit. No problem. it's easier I directly add you. On 12/02/15 14:54, Enrico Daga wrote: Thank you Sergio, as soon as I figure out how to modify the page, as it says "Immutable page" even if I am logged. However, happy to be on board! Best, Enrico -- Enrico Da

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-12 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Enrico Daga wrote: > Thank you Sergio, > as soon as I figure out how to modify the page, as it says "Immutable > page" even if I am logged. > > However, happy to be on board! Welcome! Apologies for the inconvenience -- you've run into an anti-spam measure. We nee

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-12 Thread Enrico Daga
Thank you Sergio, as soon as I figure out how to modify the page, as it says "Immutable page" even if I am logged. However, happy to be on board! Best, Enrico -- Enrico Daga http://about.me/enridaga On 12 February 2015 at 13:03, Sergio Fernández wrote: > Hi Enrico, > > On 12/02/15 11:42, Enric

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-12 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi Enrico, On 12/02/15 11:42, Enrico Daga wrote: I am very exited to see the Java/RDF communities together in this proposal! I work with RDF related software very day since 5 years ago, and I'm already member of the Stanbol and Clerezza podlings. As part of the "growing the comunity" objective,

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-12 Thread Enrico Daga
Hi everybody, I am very exited to see the Java/RDF communities together in this proposal! I work with RDF related software very day since 5 years ago, and I'm already member of the Stanbol and Clerezza podlings. As part of the "growing the comunity" objective, I would be happy to contribute to this

Re: "-incubator" in versions of podling maven artifacts

2015-02-12 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
Agreed. Both podlings and graduated projects might release components that are at different maturity levels. So formally incubation status should "really" be indicated with a different groupId, not as a version qualifier. This would however cause unnecessary confusion if/when the project graduate