Re: Should Sirona be monthly?
I don't see any comments here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2015 So I wonder what sort of administrative stuff is missing?... Thanks Olivier On 22 February 2015 at 04:01, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: All, In the last incubator report, Sirona was marked as having an incomplete report. I didn't see anything marked in the board report summary, so are we thinking the report should be expected again or accepted as is? Does the incubator have the concept of not accepting a podling's report? John -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: Should Sirona be monthly?
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: I don't see any comments here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2015 I'm the one who categorized Sirona under Report incomplete in the Summary of podling reports section: * Report incomplete Sirona I honestly thought Sirona's report was a work in progress when I did that because several sections had been left blank. So I wonder what sort of administrative stuff is missing?... It's not administrative stuff that's missing. The problem is that until Matt filed his Shepherd review, there was literally nothing in the report describing the state of the Sirona community. The following sections were left empty: * `Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:` * `How has the community developed since the last report?` * `When were the last committers or PMC members elected?` (The full report is pasted below my sig for reference.) The Board consistently follows up after TLPs who neglect to answer that last question. If the Incubator teaches that such reports are acceptable, I don't think it's doing a very good job because such reports are unlikely to be acceptable to the Board. However, when I flagged Sirona in the draft report review thread, nobody responded. In the absence of IPMC consensus that Sirona's report was unacceptable, I opted to defer to the Sirona Mentors who signed off and did not pursue the matter further. And that's where I think we leave things regarding the subject of this thread, Should Sirona be monthly?: Sirona should not be required to report next month, in deference to its Mentors. Marvin Humphrey Sirona Monitoring Solution. Sirona has been incubating since 2013-10-15. Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: 1. 2. 3. Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware of? None How has the community developed since the last report? How has the project developed since the last report? Some refactoring of the UI. A contributor made some development to have some features still working with java 1.5 Date of last release: 2014-06-26 When were the last committers or PMC members elected? Signed-off-by: [x](sirona) Olivier Lamy [ ](sirona) Henri Gomez [x](sirona) Jean-Baptiste Onofre [ ](sirona) Tammo van Lessen [ ](sirona) Mark Struberg Shepherd/Mentor notes: Matthew B. Franklin (mfranklin): Lot's of code is being committed to the project, but mostly by a couple of developers. There also does not appear to be much discussion on the list in last period, likely due to the low number of developers. I recommend the podling focus on increasing the size and participation of the community as one of the issues to address prior to graduation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Should Sirona be monthly?
On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 10:38:23 AM Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: I don't see any comments here: http://wiki.apache.org/ incubator/February2015 I'm the one who categorized Sirona under Report incomplete in the Summary of podling reports section: * Report incomplete Sirona I honestly thought Sirona's report was a work in progress when I did that because several sections had been left blank. So I wonder what sort of administrative stuff is missing?... It's not administrative stuff that's missing. The problem is that until Matt filed his Shepherd review, there was literally nothing in the report describing the state of the Sirona community. The following sections were left empty: * `Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:` * `How has the community developed since the last report?` * `When were the last committers or PMC members elected?` (The full report is pasted below my sig for reference.) The Board consistently follows up after TLPs who neglect to answer that last question. If the Incubator teaches that such reports are acceptable, I don't think it's doing a very good job because such reports are unlikely to be acceptable to the Board. That's actually why I raised my question. I had assumed the board would have flagged Sirona as not having a complete report and expected it again next month, yet I saw nothing mentioned in the board report (probably because there was a high volume of missing reports, this one skirted by?) about Sirona's not being accepted. However, when I flagged Sirona in the draft report review thread, nobody responded. In the absence of IPMC consensus that Sirona's report was unacceptable, I opted to defer to the Sirona Mentors who signed off and did not pursue the matter further. And that's where I think we leave things regarding the subject of this thread, Should Sirona be monthly?: Sirona should not be required to report next month, in deference to its Mentors. And that's where I'm struggling a bit with Sirona. Olivier's the active guy on the project, PPMC and Mentor. OpenHub and GitHub agree https://github.com/apache/sirona/graphs/contributors https://www.openhub.net/p/sirona/contributors You can even see in Olivier's email to the dev alias that he considered the report to be incomplete (only started). http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/sirona-dev/201502.mbox/%3CCAPoyBqSRbOv6Y3pkQMqkCjzz3wOhqrV0yHrEyX4aNaP_FsvfEw%40mail.gmail.com%3E Thoughts? John Marvin Humphrey Sirona Monitoring Solution. Sirona has been incubating since 2013-10-15. Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: 1. 2. 3. Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware of? None How has the community developed since the last report? How has the project developed since the last report? Some refactoring of the UI. A contributor made some development to have some features still working with java 1.5 Date of last release: 2014-06-26 When were the last committers or PMC members elected? Signed-off-by: [x](sirona) Olivier Lamy [ ](sirona) Henri Gomez [x](sirona) Jean-Baptiste Onofre [ ](sirona) Tammo van Lessen [ ](sirona) Mark Struberg Shepherd/Mentor notes: Matthew B. Franklin (mfranklin): Lot's of code is being committed to the project, but mostly by a couple of developers. There also does not appear to be much discussion on the list in last period, likely due to the low number of developers. I recommend the podling focus on increasing the size and participation of the community as one of the issues to address prior to graduation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.4 incubating (RC2)
Ping :) Regards, Alan On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote: Hello, This release still needs one more IPMC vote. (We got +1 IPMC votes from Alan Cabrera and Justin Mclean). It would be greatly appreciated If someone could take a look at our release and vote. Thank you Leonidas Fegaras On 02/15/2015 05:19 PM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote: Hello, This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.4 incubating. Apache MRQL is a query processing and optimization system for large-scale, distributed data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop, Hama, Spark, and Flink. This is our third release. A vote was held on the MRQL developer mailing list and it passed with four +1 PPMC votes, no -1 votes, and no 0 votes (see the vote thread [1] and result thread [2]), and now requires a vote on this list. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 IPMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache MRQL 0.9.4-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... The release tarballs, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mrql/0.9.4-incubating-RC2/ The release candidate consists of the following source distribution archives: - apache-mrql-0.9.4-incubating-src.[tar.gz|zip] SHA1 of TGZ: 9B21 81B9 7CAB D1D4 B58F 49B3 C013 5841 B439 D590 SHA1 of ZIP: B08F C4DE A84F F203 8EEA C124 727A 1A53 76FA 34F3 You can compile the sources using 'mvn clean install'. In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are provided for user convenience at the same location: - apache-mrql-0.9.4-incubating-bin.[tar.gz|zip] SHA1 of TGZ: F25B A476 D095 8C01 AEA3 4F94 4800 01AB 9FA4 BCBF SHA1 of ZIP: AF61 F9E3 F84A 11CA CE39 B769 B490 D963 C495 C5DD A staged Maven repository is available for review at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemrql-1003 The release candidate has been signed through the key 798764F1 in: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/mrql/KEYS The release candidate is based on the sources tagged with MRQL-0.9.4-incubating-RC2 in: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mrql.git;a=commit;h=6bf94302fb5aa8a5bd7f60362fe0fe8505da6ebb The list of fixed issues: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mrql.git;a=blob_plain;f=RELEASE_NOTES;hb=6bf94302fb5aa8a5bd7f60362fe0fe8505da6ebb To learn more about Apache MRQL, please visit: http://wiki.apache.org/mrql/ Thanks, Leonidas Fegaras [1] http://markmail.org/message/dm2n2ljgdlztsdsf [2] http://markmail.org/message/4hajddzyqlcwijyj - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache AsterixDB in to the Incubator
+1 binding Regards, Alan On Feb 19, 2015, at 9:38 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: That said, I would like to propose Apache AsterixDB as an Incubator project. I am now calling a VOTE to accept AsterixDB into the Apache Incubator. This VOTE will run for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Accept Apache AsterixDB into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Apache AsterixDB into the Incubator because..
Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator
+1 binding Regards, Alan On Feb 21, 2015, at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyriadProposal?action=recallrev=7 [ ] +1 Accept Myriad into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Myriad into the Incubator because.. I am clearly a +1. Thanks, -Adam- me@apache - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone On Feb 22, 2015, at 8:24, Aditya adityakish...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non-binding). On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:08 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On Sunday, February 22, 2015, Mohit Soni mohitsoni1...@gmail.com wrote: Definitely a +1 +1 (binding) rgds jan i Thanks Mohit — Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io javascript:; wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyriadProposal?action=recallrev=7 [ ] +1 Accept Myriad into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Myriad into the Incubator because.. I am clearly a +1. Thanks, -Adam- me@apache -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator
+1 Santosh On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: +1 binding Regards, Alan On Feb 21, 2015, at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyriadProposal?action=recallrev=7 [ ] +1 Accept Myriad into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Myriad into the Incubator because.. I am clearly a +1. Thanks, -Adam- me@apache - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator
+1 On Feb 22, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.iomailto:a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyriadProposal?action=recallrev=7 [ ] +1 Accept Myriad into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Myriad into the Incubator because.. I am clearly a +1. Thanks, -Adam- me@apache
Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator
Lewis, It looks like there were a few things called out. - Identify a champion (looks like you did already) - Solicit support from mentors. It looks like those are the only two open issues. Benedikt cannot be listed as a mentor, as mentioned previously (unless I'm missing an email), but feel free to include him as a PPMC member/commons representative (would be more accurate than listing under mentor from my POV.. unless he's interested in helping out the incubator and shows off his skills quick enough [PS - looking for shepherds for next month's report]). If you need a hand, I'd be happy to throw my hat in with you and Rob (I'm jumping at Marvin's note about low maintenance). John On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 2:53:26 PM Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Folks, I've read through the commentary on the recent [DISCUSS] thread for Commons RDF [0]. It is not clear to me what the outcome was really... can anyone else provide a fresh insight as to where this proposal is going and what is required to progress it from status draft to status proposal? Thanks in advance Lewis [0] *http://s.apache.org/Vtk http://s.apache.org/Vtk* -- *Lewis*
Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) ~ Joe Stein On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Just curious - why 7 days instead of the standard 72 hour window. Either way, +1, good luck with incubation. John On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 12:35:57 AM Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyriadProposal?action=recallrev=7 [ ] +1 Accept Myriad into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Myriad into the Incubator because.. I am clearly a +1. Thanks, -Adam- me@apache
Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator
7 days was chosen to be conservative. I advised Adam not to hurry the vote. On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:04 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Just curious - why 7 days instead of the standard 72 hour window. Either way, +1, good luck with incubation. John On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 12:35:57 AM Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyriadProposal?action=recallrev=7 [ ] +1 Accept Myriad into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Myriad into the Incubator because.. I am clearly a +1. Thanks, -Adam- me@apache
[STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator
Hi Folks, I've read through the commentary on the recent [DISCUSS] thread for Commons RDF [0]. It is not clear to me what the outcome was really... can anyone else provide a fresh insight as to where this proposal is going and what is required to progress it from status draft to status proposal? Thanks in advance Lewis [0] *http://s.apache.org/Vtk http://s.apache.org/Vtk* -- *Lewis*
Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator
+1 On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Santosh Marella smare...@maprtech.com wrote: +1 Santosh On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: +1 binding Regards, Alan On Feb 21, 2015, at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyriadProposal?action=recallrev=7 [ ] +1 Accept Myriad into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Myriad into the Incubator because.. I am clearly a +1. Thanks, -Adam- me@apache - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 512 961 6719
Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator
Just curious - why 7 days instead of the standard 72 hour window. Either way, +1, good luck with incubation. John On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 12:35:57 AM Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyriadProposal?action=recallrev=7 [ ] +1 Accept Myriad into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Myriad into the Incubator because.. I am clearly a +1. Thanks, -Adam- me@apache
Re: Should Sirona be monthly?
On 23 February 2015 at 03:07, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 10:38:23 AM Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: I don't see any comments here: http://wiki.apache.org/ incubator/February2015 I'm the one who categorized Sirona under Report incomplete in the Summary of podling reports section: * Report incomplete Sirona I honestly thought Sirona's report was a work in progress when I did that because several sections had been left blank. So I wonder what sort of administrative stuff is missing?... It's not administrative stuff that's missing. The problem is that until Matt filed his Shepherd review, there was literally nothing in the report describing the state of the Sirona community. The following sections were left empty: * `Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:` * `How has the community developed since the last report?` * `When were the last committers or PMC members elected?` (The full report is pasted below my sig for reference.) The Board consistently follows up after TLPs who neglect to answer that last question. If the Incubator teaches that such reports are acceptable, I don't think it's doing a very good job because such reports are unlikely to be acceptable to the Board. That's actually why I raised my question. I had assumed the board would have flagged Sirona as not having a complete report and expected it again next month, yet I saw nothing mentioned in the board report (probably because there was a high volume of missing reports, this one skirted by?) about Sirona's not being accepted. However, when I flagged Sirona in the draft report review thread, nobody responded. In the absence of IPMC consensus that Sirona's report was unacceptable, I opted to defer to the Sirona Mentors who signed off and did not pursue the matter further. And that's where I think we leave things regarding the subject of this thread, Should Sirona be monthly?: Sirona should not be required to report next month, in deference to its Mentors. And that's where I'm struggling a bit with Sirona. Olivier's the active guy on the project, PPMC and Mentor. OpenHub and GitHub agree https://github.com/apache/sirona/graphs/contributors https://www.openhub.net/p/sirona/contributors You can even see in Olivier's email to the dev alias that he considered the report to be incomplete (only started). http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/sirona-dev/201502.mbox/%3CCAPoyBqSRbOv6Y3pkQMqkCjzz3wOhqrV0yHrEyX4aNaP_FsvfEw%40mail.gmail.com%3E Thoughts? I missed to answer to my own email saying that's finished. Sorry I reckon I'm really bad on administrative papers things Olivier John Marvin Humphrey Sirona Monitoring Solution. Sirona has been incubating since 2013-10-15. Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: 1. 2. 3. Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware of? None How has the community developed since the last report? How has the project developed since the last report? Some refactoring of the UI. A contributor made some development to have some features still working with java 1.5 Date of last release: 2014-06-26 When were the last committers or PMC members elected? Signed-off-by: [x](sirona) Olivier Lamy [ ](sirona) Henri Gomez [x](sirona) Jean-Baptiste Onofre [ ](sirona) Tammo van Lessen [ ](sirona) Mark Struberg Shepherd/Mentor notes: Matthew B. Franklin (mfranklin): Lot's of code is being committed to the project, but mostly by a couple of developers. There also does not appear to be much discussion on the list in last period, likely due to the low number of developers. I recommend the podling focus on increasing the size and participation of the community as one of the issues to address prior to graduation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator
On 22/02/15 19:52, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: Hi Folks, I've read through the commentary on the recent [DISCUSS] thread for Commons RDF [0]. It is not clear to me what the outcome was really... can anyone else provide a fresh insight as to where this proposal is going and what is required to progress it from status draft to status proposal? Thanks in advance Lewis [0] *http://s.apache.org/Vtk http://s.apache.org/Vtk* Sergio is out for a bit, back soon. Since there is no rush (?), no one has rushed ... Andy On 12/02/15 14:12, Sergio Fernández wrote: I'll be out for a couple of weeks. But my colleagues in the proposal will keep involved in the discussion. Then let's hope in that time someone will have jumped in and we can move forward with the formal process. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache AsterixDB in to the Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Tim On Feb 22, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: +1 binding Regards, Alan On Feb 19, 2015, at 9:38 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: That said, I would like to propose Apache AsterixDB as an Incubator project. I am now calling a VOTE to accept AsterixDB into the Apache Incubator. This VOTE will run for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Accept Apache AsterixDB into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Apache AsterixDB into the Incubator because.. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) -C On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hello friends, After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyriadProposal?action=recallrev=7 [ ] +1 Accept Myriad into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t accept Myriad into the Incubator because.. I am clearly a +1. Thanks, -Adam- me@apache - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
