Forwarding my +1 from dev@calcite:
+1. I checked the signatures, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE files,
built the code and ran the tests, and checked to make sure there were no
jars or class files in the distribution.
Alan.
Julian Hyde mailto:jh...@apache.org
March 16, 2015 at 23:30
Hi
Hi all,
The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Calcite 1.1.0-incubating.
Proposal:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/calcite-dev/201503.mbox/%3ccamctmekcqb3bezn0q-1ug6tzxm1p6jzjvbun9jupsfnjc3r...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Vote result:
3 binding +1 votes
1
This should also be done for the logo as well... I don't
know the provenance of it, but I am sure that the Groovy
team does not want to abandon its logo.
On Mar 17, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 3/17/15 12:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015
Hi,
+1 binding
- signatures and hashes correct
- artefact has incubating in it's name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- All source files have Apache header
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source
- Tests pass
Minor issue is that the RC was not placed in the
On 3/17/15 12:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 3/11/15 4:20 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Great initiative!
Just one question: I don't see anything related to the groovy name and
possible trademark in the proposal.
Hi everybody,
when will the voting start? Or if it did start already when will there
be decision?
Thanks and kind regards,
Pascal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi Hervé,
It would be very nice, if it fits the general schedule (Groovy is not
yet voted).
Best regards,
On 16/03/2015 23:00, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
Hi,
We're scheduling the Jira migration for Maven projects on the week-end of
4/5/6 april.
If this schedule is fine for Groovy, I suppose it
Hi Russel!
thanks for following up here. I've seen that others have commented
on the points you raised, but I also wanted to chime in before this
thread goes into a VOTE phase.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 08:55 +0100, Bertrand
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...You may think that the discussion has died down, but perhaps recall
the lesson of NiFi. Or not, it might not strike you as applicable...
I wasn't involved (or maybe I think I wasn't ;-) so I don't - archive
URLs
After a week-long voting period, the VOTE for accepting Singa into the
Apache Incubator has passed with 7 binding +1s and 1 binding +0 .
+1 (binding)
Konstantin I Boudnik
Ted Dunning
Alan Gates
Thejas Nair
Konstantin I Boudnik
Alan Cabrera
Daniel Dai
+0 (binding)
Jan I
Thanks for voting!
I
Roman is saying he will start the vote tomorrow. You will see a thread
on this list with [VOTE] in the subject.
As to what the vote is about - this is the Apache Incubator PMC (Project
Management Committee) voting as to whether to accept Groovy into the
Incubator. Votes from others, who aren’t on
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:09 PM Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing
a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
... Starting the vote on the proposal is Roman's job anyway, as the Groovy
champion, so let's wait for him...
Is there any reason to wait more?
IMO the discussion on the proposal has died down so we can move
Hello
The Apache NiFi team is excited to announce the release of Apache NiFi
0.0.2-incubating.
Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to
process and distribute data. Apache NiFi was made for dataflow. It
supports highly configurable directed graphs of data routing,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
...We already have demonstrated our ability to raises various points on
various subjects, time to demonstrate The ASF in action !..
+1 - as I said elsethread it's in theory Roman's job to start the
vote, as the Groovy
Hi guys,
we can discuss for 3 more months, but at some point, isn't it time to
start a vote ?
We already have demonstrated our ability to raises various points on
various subjects, time to demonstrate The ASF in action !
-
To
On 17/03/2015 15:34, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
...We already have demonstrated our ability to raises various points on
various subjects, time to demonstrate The ASF in action !..
+1 - as I said elsethread it's in
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Cédric Champeau
cedric.champ...@gmail.com wrote:
...I wouldn't mind starting a vote early, given the time constraints that we
have :)...
Ok, I'll start the vote Wednesday morning CET unless we hear from
Roman until then.
-Bertrand
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
You may think that the discussion has died down, but perhaps recall
the lesson of NiFi. Or not, it might not strike you as applicable.
exactly!
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 3/11/15 4:20 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Great initiative!
Just one question: I don't see anything related to the groovy name and
possible trademark in the proposal. Does Pivotal have any claims to
the name
You may think that the discussion has died down, but perhaps recall
the lesson of NiFi. Or not, it might not strike you as applicable.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
we can discuss for 3 more months, but at some point, isn't it time to
start a vote ?
Sure. But at least a week for something like Groovy should be expected.
Besides, I still owe IPMC an answer about status
Hi!
having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing
a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week.
I am going to start a vote tomorrow once a full week of [DISCUSS]
elapses.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...I still owe IPMC an answer about status of the Groovy trademark.
I'm trying to research this on my end with Pivotal team...
Sure, it's good to find out but I don't think that's a blocker for
entering incubation.
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing
a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week
I don't think letting the vote drag on purpose is useful - after
25 matches
Mail list logo
