IP clearance template - tweak sanity check

2015-08-22 Thread Nick Burch
Hi All I hit a snag when trying to fill out the IP clearance template, in the Identify name recorded for software grant section, as it used to only refer to grants.txt. Based on advice from Craig wearing his secretary hat, I've updated that to handle grants given as part of a CCLA, as well as

IP clearance template - tweak sanity check

2015-08-22 Thread Nick Burch
Hi All I hit a snag when trying to fill out the IP clearance template, in the Identify name recorded for software grant section, as it used to only refer to grants.txt. Based on advice from Craig wearing his secretary hat, I've updated that to handle grants given as part of a CCLA, as well as

Re: apache binary distributions

2015-08-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 22/08/2015 04:37, Niclas Hedhman wrote: Cool. I can't find info on how much it costs ASF, any pointers before embarking on 100+ artifact signing spree... ;-) With my infra hat on... The short answer is 'Don't worry about it and get signing.' The longer answer is that if a project wants to

[ANNOUNCE] First Release 0.1-incubating of Tamaya Configuration published

2015-08-22 Thread Anatole Tresch
Dear all We are happy to announce that Apache Tamaya successfully published its first release. Apache Tamaya provides a flexible yet extensible configuration API/SPI, which allows to configure any kind of applications or modules. The current release hereby ships with a Java 7 and and a Java 8

Re: IP clearance template - tweak sanity check

2015-08-22 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Nick, Nice work. Just one comment, typo “form” should be “for”. Original: If recorded in the cclas.txt document, use the company name (field 2 without submitter name) and the form name (field 4, without any people's names). Proposed: If recorded in the cclas.txt document, use the company

RE: IP clearance template - tweak sanity check

2015-08-22 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
The template is very handy and good to know about. Simple observations: A. Process section 3, first bullet, should also have and/or *an* ASF officer as in the second bullet. B. Process section 5, concerning checksum and detached signature. This has come up recently, so is fresh in my mind.