Hi.
I really like our open way of reporting using the wiki but we have a small
flaw in the procedure.
The wiki is not the place to report a private/private section, so I
will send it to private@i.a.o and hope it will be included.
rgds
jan i.
On 29 August 2015 at 01:00, Marvin Humphrey
On 8/28/15 8:53 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Dennis this is now triple posted including one private list. I
request you no longer contact me directly as I thought I was replying
privately to our prior conversation and would have moderated some of
my language. BTW what I wrote has NOTHING to do with
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exits
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have headers
- Can compile from source
Minor thing to consider changing is signing the release with an Apache email
address.
Thanks,
Justin
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
I would much prefer a smaller list of initial committers who have been
identified as having experience or a solid potential to be ASF
committers, and let others be elected based on merit as the project
progresses.
Txs for clarifying Marvin, we gonna report next month, ok?
LieGrue,
strub
Am 29.08.2015 um 00:28 schrieb Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
Hi Justin,
I've filed CALCITE-860 and CALCITE-861 to address the issues you
identified. We'll be sure to get them addressed for the next release.
Thanks for reviewing the release and voting.
Jacques
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
Hi,
+0
Hi,
+0 (binding) and please fix up the licensing issues for the next release.
Checked:
- Release file name includes incubating
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE has some issues (see below), but all licenses involved are permissive
and Apache compatable.
- NOTICE ok
- No unexpected binary files
-
