Re: [graduation] Maturity model-based assessment of Groovy for its graduation

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > ...that might just be me... I agree that each of our projects regularly evaluating their state against the maturity model would be useful. We can either make that a requirement (like once a year as part of the board

Re: [graduation] Maturity model-based assessment of Groovy for its graduation

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > ...In particular, this document isn't a "metric", is is more of a > checklist... Yeah that was part of the maturity model's design [1]: avoid the levels of compliance that many such models have, but rather make it modular

Re: 回复： [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

Hi, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Luke Han wrote: > ...Could you please help to double check again?... http://incubator.apache.org/projects/kylin.html looks good to me now, so +1. -Bertrand - To

Re: 回复： [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

Hi Bertrand, Could you please help to double check again? Would love to have your vote changed if there's no other issue;-) Thanks. Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

+1 mvn test passed hongbin ma 于2015年10月19日周一 上午11:28写道： > +1 > > unit test passed on my CI > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Li Yang wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Checksum is correct. > > > > Unit test passed on java version "1.7.0_71", OpenJDK Runtime

Re: Starting from the other end

Hi, On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > ...The first step (What Apache Incubator Does) can be edited at > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dxUVHGWcj83wIVnskYL7iM7PiiScLLNS4HjGHa6LsgA/edit?usp=sharing > ... I like that. Combined with a set of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

+1 > On Oct 19, 2015, at 7:40 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Forwarding my vote from the dev list: > > +1 (binding) > >> On Oct 19, 2015, at 1:18 AM, 周千昊 wrote: >> >> +1 >> mvn test passed >> >> hongbin ma 于2015年10月19日周一 上午11:28写道： >>

[DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

Hello Everyone, My name is Arun Manoharan. Currently a product manager in the Analytics platform team at eBay Inc. I would like to start a discussion on Eagle and its joining the ASF as an incubation project. Eagle is a Monitoring solution for Hadoop to instantly identify access to sensitive

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Forwarding my vote from the dev list: +1 (binding) > On Oct 19, 2015, at 1:18 AM, 周千昊 wrote: > > +1 > mvn test passed > > hongbin ma 于2015年10月19日周一 上午11:28写道： > >> +1 >> >> unit test passed on my CI >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Li Yang

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

Hi Arun, very interesting proposal. I may see some possible interaction with Falcon. In Falcon, we have HDFS files (and Hive/HBase) monitoring (with a kind of Change Data Capture), etc. So, I see a different perspective in Eagle, but Eagle could also leverage Falcon somehow. Regards JB

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

I would suggest that Owen O'Malley has not had enough time to be a viable mentor recently and should not be on the list of mentors. Henry and Julian are good if their schedules permit. Henry, I know has been mentoring a number of projects lately. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste

Re: Starting from the other end

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I did some wordsmithing but not certain how that works properly in Google > Docs in terms of how changes are made evident for review, etc. > > - Dennis > > PS: When I go back and review, I see that I needed to leave

Re: When podlings don't file a report

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Mentors, in my opinion, are not responsible for their podlings. They are > responsible for guiding the podlings but not for filing. > > Mentors do have a responsibility to the IPMC to make a recommendation (e.g. >

RE: When podlings don't file a report

This is one aspect that I feel needs fixing. Currently there are too many people who "might" be responsible. What we need is someone who *is* responsible. It's initially the mentors, but if (as per your original question) a podling has failed to file for 4 months then the mentors are clearly

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

Hi JB, That is a good Point. Good to know that Falcon feeds HDFS/Hive/HBase data changes, so this feature would complement Eagle which today mainly focuses on HDFS/Hive/HBase data access including view, change, delete etc. Eagle would benefit if Eagle can instantly capture data change from

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.13.0-incubating (rc1)

Hi, Voting for Apache REEF 0.13.0-incubating (rc1) is now closed. The release has passed with three binding +1's, five non-binding +1's and no other votes. Thank you everyone who participated! 3 binding +1's: - Daniel Gruno - Ross Gardler - Chris Douglas 5 non-binding +1's: - Dongjoon Hyun -

Re: Starting from the other end

Bertrand, Thanks. My content vision here is that the landing page at incubator should highlight whatever task that most people landing there want to do. My suspicion is that this task is to answer either "what is incubator?" or "how can I bring my project to Apache?". Regardless, we will need

Re: Starting from the other end

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > I think I'm with Sam. I think these are related. Or to be more explicit: > the way a project joins a foundation (regardless of what path it takes) > is via a board passing a resolution. > > Perhaps defining exact

Re: Starting from the other end

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > We have just had a few interminable threads regarding what is wrong with > incubator and jumping directly to implementation attempts for changes. > > That isn't the way I would code something complex so it seems to me

Re: Starting from the other end

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >... > Perhaps defining exact criteria that the board uses to evaluate such > resolutions would be useful. > The Board evaluates them differently based on the path. I explained Direct else-thread. Historically, the

Re: Starting from the other end

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > And that is precisely why I have held back on your invitation that I > edit the document. > > From a board evaluation perspective, I can tell you that proposals, > mentors, and the like are not required. Suggesting that

Re: 回复： [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good luck, guys! -- Alex On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Luke Han wrote: > > ...Could you please help to double check again?... > >

Re: Starting from the other end

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> We already have what amounts to three paths: there is the full >> Incubation process; there is is IP clearance, and there is straight to >> TLP. We can view these as three points on a spectrum. Having a well >>

Re: Starting from the other end

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: >>... > >> Huge +1 to the above. Very well said and is exactly how I now start >> thing about the problem myself: Incubator is what's needed

Re: Starting from the other end

Inline On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > We have just had a few interminable threads regarding what is wrong with > > incubator and jumping directly to implementation

Re: Starting from the other end

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >... > Huge +1 to the above. Very well said and is exactly how I now start > thing about the problem myself: Incubator is what's needed when > there are gaps in straight to TLP. Lets identify what those gaps > There

Re: Starting from the other end

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> Ted, was it your intent to first get an agreement on *what* we all > expect > >> from the Incubator and then follow up on *how* are these expectations > >> going to be met by our current policies? > >> > > > > I

Re: Starting from the other end

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> >> Ted, was it your intent to first get an agreement on *what* we all >> expect >> >> from the Incubator and then follow up on *how*

Re: Starting from the other end

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > I'm growing increasingly enamored of the approach Bertrand (and > others) are advocating: focusing on what the incubator ideally > produces, namely a regular stream of Establish resolutions each > accompanied by

Re: Starting from the other end

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >... > The Maturity Model defines evaluation criteria. It is probably the most > useful for the task we're focused on now, which is how to decide when a > proposed TLP is ready, regardless of the path it took

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

It makes sense. I will try to contribute on this ;) Regards JB On 10/19/2015 09:46 PM, Zhang, Edward (GDI Hadoop) wrote: Hi JB, That is a good Point. Good to know that Falcon feeds HDFS/Hive/HBase data changes, so this feature would complement Eagle which today mainly focuses on

Re: 回复： [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

Hi John, The status page is updated during these days for some new information, dates and others. Could you please check and and let's know if there's still any issue. Thanks. Best Regards! - Luke Han On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:08 AM, John D. Ament

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Mynewt into the Apache Incubator

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Sterling Hughes wrote: > Hi All, > > As mentioned in the DISCUSS thread, all feedback has been positive on > the Mynewt proposal, so I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Mynewt as a > new ASF incubator project. > > The full text of the proposal

Re: 回复： [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

It looks weird to me that the date for the SGA is ambiguous. No one has a more exact date than 2015? On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:47 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Luke Han wrote: > > ...Could you please help to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Signature file look good Hash files look good LICENSE and DISCLAIMER exist No 3rd party exes found in source artifacts +1 (binding) - Henry On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:42 PM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal

RE: Starting from the other end

+1 from me too. I did some wordsmithing but not certain how that works properly in Google Docs in terms of how changes are made evident for review, etc. - Dennis PS: When I go back and review, I see that I needed to leave more highlights or comments to indicate places where I made