Re: Must name and copyright of bundled (other) ASF artifacts be attributed in NOTICE file?

Hi, >> It is not necessary to duplicate the line "This product includes software >> developed at the Apache Software Foundation...", though the ASF copyright >> line and any other portions of NOTICE must be considered for propagation. I’m also not sure that that agrees with this [1] + [2],

Re: Must name and copyright of bundled (other) ASF artifacts be attributed in NOTICE file?

Hi, >It is not necessary to duplicate the line "This product includes software >developed at the Apache Software Foundation...", though the ASF copyright >line and any other portions of NOTICE must be considered for propagation. Which seem a a little unclear, consider to me mean it

Re: Must name and copyright of bundled (other) ASF artifacts be attributed in NOTICE file?

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Ate Douma wrote: > I'm helping out the AsterixDB podling assembling a first release with > bundled binaries, and one of the advises I've given is that: > > For bundled ASF artifacts you need to merge (at least) their name and > copyright year

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Ah, I see the third +1 from Roman now. On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:52 AM John D. Ament wrote: > Its customary for the result to include the names of who voted, for > example I only see 2 +1's on the incubator list (but maybe I'm not seeing > the email properly). In

Re: Retirement guide updates

(sorry, I'm a little late in the discussion...) no, DOAP was not retired I tried to makes things simpler in the documentation: https://projects.apache.org/about.html Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 31 janvier 2016 22:00:18 John D. Ament a écrit : > I believe doap was retired in the projects-new

Re: Retirement guide updates

dropping the DOAP file of a retired incubator project means removing the project from projects list [1]: it seems reasonable there is one task to do: remove the entry from projects DOAP files list [2] notice that this step has to be done only when a project has previously made the effort to

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Congratulations on the first official release! This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice recognition, and autocorrect on my iPhone. > On Feb 6, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Nitin Lamba wrote: > > Hello, > > > Here are the results of the vote for releasing Apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.9.0-incubating (RC3)

Let me reiterate my +1 (binding) vote here... Anyone else willing to review the release ? On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache > SystemML version 0.9.0! > > The PPMC vote thread: >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Hello, Here are the results of the vote for releasing Apache Geode (incubating) release 1.0.0-incubating.M1 (RC2): +1 votes: 3 (3 binding) +0 votes: 1 (0 binding) -1 votes: 0 (0 binding) The vote has succeeded - the release will now be completed. Nitin (on behalf of the Geode team)

Re: Making license adjustment tools publicly available

Christopher wrote on 2/4/16 7:25 PM: > It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed > under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside > the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source > license on software which is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Non-authoritative answer: Name: badHostName.badCompany.com Address: 92.242.140.21 On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:34 AM Dan Smith wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > Thanks for testing it out and

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Its customary for the result to include the names of who voted, for example I only see 2 +1's on the incubator list (but maybe I'm not seeing the email properly). In addition, since I'm an IPMC member my +0 is binding (not sure why you listed as 0 binding). John On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:31 AM

Re: New ASF visual identity

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > The main Incubator website needs to be updated with the new visual > identity, as do podling websites. > > I volunteer to create a drop-in replacement for the egg logo: The updated logo is now available:

Re: Retirement guide updates

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > dropping the DOAP file of a retired incubator project means removing the > project from projects list [1]: it seems reasonable > there is one task to do: remove the entry from projects DOAP files list [2] Thanks,

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

Hi, Here what I worked out needs to be added to LICENSE and NOTICE for each type of bundled license. Bundled Code licenseLICENSE NOTICE Apache 1.1 Y Y Not sure what need to be added to NOTICE here ASF Apache 2.0 N

Re: Must name and copyright of bundled (other) ASF artifacts be attributed in NOTICE file?

On 2/6/16, 8:29 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: > >So the question is, what parts of NOTICE pertaining to Apache projects >must we >propagate, and what portions can we omit? I'd say that the name of the >Apache >project and the copyright statement ought to be bubbled up.

Must name and copyright of bundled (other) ASF artifacts be attributed in NOTICE file?

I'm helping out the AsterixDB podling assembling a first release with bundled binaries, and one of the advises I've given is that: For bundled ASF artifacts you need to merge (at least) their name and copyright year statement, to be compliant with ASL 2.0, section 4.d [1] However Justin

Re: New mentors for Taverna?

Hi all, I'm one of the "semi-active mentors" of Taverna. In my case, I have a new $job, which is related to some Apache communities but not Taverna. A new job is a busy time so I'm really not able to properly support the podling at the moment. I wish I could but I also have to be realistic.