Re: Single person developed project

2016-02-16 Thread Henri Yandell
Note that http://labs.apache.org/ may be what you're looking for if this is your own project. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu < amareshw...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > Wanted to know if a single person developed project can get incubated in > Apache. Any doc links

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry from the Incubator

2016-02-16 Thread Sravya Tirukkovalur
Justin, Yes, for the release 1.5.0 - voting was restarted on the general list[1]. We later on did releases 1.5.1 (to fix some issues in 1.5.0) and 1.6.0. [1]:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry from the Incubator

2016-02-16 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, There was I recall some issue withApache Sentry incubating releases [1]. Was this resolved? Thanks, Justin 1. http://markmail.org/message/75bxp6txgzwpxt77 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Fwd: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry from the Incubator

2016-02-16 Thread Sravya Tirukkovalur
Hi all, Based on recommendation in the graduation guide[1], this email is to notify the incubator general list that voting is going on in the Sentry dev list to graduate the project. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-community-vote -- Forwarded message

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

2016-02-16 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Normally we should only have dual licensed GPL/CDDL unless I have missed > something. Note that most of the GPL/CDDL dual licensed files have this: If you wish your version of this file to be governed by only the CDDL or only the GPL Version 2, indicate your decision by adding

Re: Single person developed project

2016-02-16 Thread William A Rowe Jr
The technical reason for "no solo projects" that already answer your question lies in the ASF governance model, which is based on meritocracy where all who participate in the project are expected to be part of its oversite (there is no allowance for a "BDFL" (Benevolent Dictator For Life)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

2016-02-16 Thread Serge Huber
> On 16 févr. 2016, at 07:10, Justin Mclean wrote: > > I got this error when compiling - looks like a path may be wrong: > [INFO] Apache Unomi :: Distribution Package ... FAILURE [ 0.568 > s] > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

2016-02-16 Thread Serge Huber
Hi Justin, Thank you so much for this detailed testing and report. Normally we should only have dual licensed GPL/CDDL unless I have missed something. We are working on a plugin legal-maven-plugin that actually does recursively go down into embedded JARs to make sure we collect everything but