On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>> To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for
>> the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not
[Resending by appending [RESULT] in the subject]
The vote for Apache Sentry to become a top-level project has passed
with 6 +1 votes (and 6 non binding) and no 0 or -1 votes.
Thank you everyone for taking the time to review and cast your vote!
We will submit the resolution to the board for
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for
> the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not
> just some engineers.
Great! I just wanted to capture a bit of serendipitous
The vote for Apache Sentry to become a top-level project has passed
with 6 +1 votes (and 6 non binding) and no 0 or -1 votes.
Thank you everyone for taking the time to review and cast your vote!
We will submit the resolution to the board for the next Board meeting.
Here is the tally:
+1
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Has the podling gone through the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process yet?
Not yet. Thanks for the reminder.
>
> Seems like that would come up in the shakedown, then -- just mentioning it
> because you came across it now, Roman?
>
+1 binding
As Justin mentions this is a bit rough, but it is a v0.8-b1 release, and
it's been very good for the podling to go through the process of a full
release.
Sterling
On 2/26/16 7:01 PM, Christopher Collins wrote:
Hello,
The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to
Has the podling gone through the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process yet?
Seems like that would come up in the shakedown, then -- just mentioning it
because you came across it now, Roman?
On Feb 26, 2016 5:33 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote:
> To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with